Home » Upper Law Society of Canada Posts

Category Archives: Upper Law Society of Canada Posts

About Us

We are a help website with links to some very useful Landlord & Tenant Board, Privacy Commissioner, Upper Law Society links and some interesting posts in the news that you can view and follow.

logo_twitter follow us on facebook logo_googleemail us

Categories

The Stewart Solution – A Tenants guide to harassment

The Stewart Solution ~ A Tenants Guide to harassment and what you can do to retaliate

 

Catherine-Stewart-pic1When Catherine Stewart or April Stewart or whatever name she is using now arrives in your life for the first time to start eviction proceedings, you have some options that you can consider to retaliate against her Sharp Practice tactics and her landlord clients.
These are true facts Stewart does not want you to know before she attempts to evict you.

We only list some retaliation possibilities that you can consider doing and leave the decisions and actions up to you. We take no responsibility for any actions that may have been taken per our suggestions listed below. We will be adding more suggestions listed below as members voice their opinions and emails continue to come in. Tenants have rights to !

The goal here is to cost the landlord as much money as possible with damages and legal fees if they try to come after you for any costs involved with the eviction, you are protected by the Landlord & Tenant Act and ODSP Act section 18 and section 51(1) of the ODSP Regulations.

Intent of Policy :To ensure that a recipient’s income support is protected from seizure and garnishment by creditors or transfer to another party to satisfy a debt.

As with Stewart being protected for her illegal methods, you are also protected if you are on ODSP or Public Assistance and can not be garnished for any reason.The landlord will have to come up with the money to fix the place and all legal fees required to attempt to pursue any LTB or Civil Court actions to get the damages recovered, and you simply don’t show up as Civil Courts in Ontario are Mickey Mouse and a Kangaroo court anyways.They will not be able to recover any money even if the court awards damage and cost against you. Their tough luck !

Let the landlord waste their time with the paperwork and the extreme costs involved to try and recover any of the alleged damages to their property. Have no mercy when you are being harassed and feel threatened by this invasion of a paralegal hiding behind her illegal property management company, she will have no mercy on you.

Read the many posts concerning Stewart’s Sharp practice and the intentional privacy violations she has been known to do to tenants she evicts.

When Stewart attempts to photograph your entire unit before your eviction, it is against the LTB Act 2006.Stewart is well known to try and get photos and serial numbers of appliances before she attempts to evict a tenant. Privacy Violators has received several emails complaining that Paul Smith is still entering their unit for Stewart with intentions of photographing every square inch. Make sure your witnesses show and the photos are disclosed in LTB court that she takes.

Landlords can take photos if they pertain to scheduled maintenance and should be noted in the Intent to Enter she will send to you. It is against the LTB Act to photograph a tenants unit or personal belongings in preparation for an eviction. Make sure she produces the photos at the LTB and bring this violation up to the LTB judge.

Remember this : If Stewart is knocking on your door then she is there to evict you for her landlord client. Do not trust anything Catherine Stewart says or signs, it is well known she breaches agreements to make you fight for the funds owed as many tenants have had to do in the past against her.

Landlord and tenant Board

CATHERINE STEWART DOES NOT HONOR ANY AGREEMENT SHE MAKES OR SIGNS !!

Read the many posts about not trusting Stewart and failing to honor her signed agreement.

  1. Take and post photos of Paul Smith when he attempts to photograph your unit against the LTB rules.
  2. Post the photos of any sent inspector photographing your complete unit on all your social networks.
  3. Record everything Paul Smith (or any inspector Catherine Stewart sends) does and says in your unit.
  4. Have witnesses present when she does enter and photograph your entire unit before evicting you.
  5. Keep detailed notes and all communication received from Catherine Stewart for court purposes.
  6. Hang sheets over walls or cover personal photos, documents before inspector comes. Its your place and can do what you want. you do not have to remove anything and the inspector is not allowed to remove them or open closets, cupboards, fridges or stoves to get serial numbers. bring this up at LTB if she does this.
  7. I would paint the sheets with FUCK YOU before I hung them personally but its your call what you do.
  8. Do not open closet doors for inspector or allow him to do so. Against the LTB Act 2006 for them to do so
  9. Film and record the inspector’s movements with a camera or your phone while he is in your home.
  10. Do not open the fridge, stove or any appliance for the inspector. Against the LTB Act 2006 for them to do so.
  11. The time and date for the inspection has to be noted on the Intent to enter ahe will place on your door.
  12. Stewart is well known for disclosing private tenant information so protect your photos & documents beforehand
  13. Stewart is known for ignoring requests to change date, even interrupted a birthday party to photograph a unit.
  14. Stewart is well known for having her boyfriend, ex OPP Paul Smith sign false statements for landlord clients.
  15. Stewart is well known for protecting Paul Smith from any summons served to them. Read many past posts.
  16. Stewart is well known to break into tenants units without proper legal paperwork to do so.Read POST HERE
  17. Stewart is well known to block all contact from any tenants she encounters, so much for property management

When you go to Landlord & Tenant Board hearing

  1. Ask for disclosure of ALL documents and the Photos taken when you go to the LTB hearing.
  2. Bring your witnesses into the LTB hearing for the judge to hear testimony of this illegal photographing
  3. Mention to LTB judge that Stewart signs illegal name of April Stewart on legal court documents
  4. Mention to the LTB judge Catherine Stewart is legal name and she is a paid paralegal for the landlord
  5. DEMAND DISCLOSURE !! Stewart is known for not giving disclosure or any evidence for any court hearings.
  6. Check LTB main office for any documents she claims to have had signed by Paul Smith or any witness used
    (Catherine Stewart has been alleged and known to have filed false statements and evidence into hearings)
  7. Bring to the attention of the LTB judge she does not fit the definition of landlord under the LTB Act 2006.
  8. Bring to the attention of the duty counsel Stewart is a paralegal and not allowed to represent landlords in LTB.
  9. Serve a summons to the inspector or the (in our opinion) coward ex OPP boyfriend, Paul Smith who knowingly violates tenants rights for his paralegal girlfriend or wife. (undetermined yet). Best place to serve Paul Smith is 117 Bayfield Street, Barrie or their residence in Walters Falls, Ontario.

File complaints with the Law Society of Upper Canada (LSUC)

* There are pending complaints filed with the Law Society concerning Stewart’s false statement and false evidence allegations with about 9 other complaints against this pathetic paralegal.Law_Society_of_Upper_Canada_(logo)

  1. Report Catherine Stewart to the Law Society of Upper Canada for investigation again.
  2. Send detailed complaint with all the infractions she is bound to breach and use against you.
  3. Publish the complaints online so the public can see the neglect going on at the Law Society intake process.
  4. Send complaints to the local newspaper or local news station to warn the public of this paralegals tactics.
  5. Send us your info, file numbers and photos to publish here for the public to see on Privacy violators website.

If Stewart manages to evict you from your unit, here are some things you can do to retaliate against her and her landlords for infringing on your tenant’s rights. As long as you are the legal tenant on the agreement, all issues concerning the rental unit would go before the Landlord and Tenant Board again, if you decide to show up for them after the fact.

Any damage done to the rental unit while you are in legal control of the unit would have to be addressed in LTB court or a Civil Court to recover any damages if the landlord goes to the expense of hiring a paralegal or lawyer to pursue costs.

If you are on ODSP or on Public assistance you can not be garnished for any reason and money cannot be taken from your government checks. This is something Stewart does not want you to know before an eviction.

6tyoja8lcFIGHT FIRE WITH FIRE – ILLEGAL EVICTIONS ARE WRONG !!

The final goodbye to your landlord and Catherine Stewart after she finally evicts you. Do any of these suggestions at your own risk before the last day of your lease or the agreed move out date if any are set at LTB court.

Barrie police informs us that this will continue to be a Landlord and tenant matter until the lease or agreement is up and you move out.make sure to cost the landlord a lot of money for attacking your tenant privacy and evicting you using the illegal methods of Catherine Stewart and Paul Smith. Do not be nice and make your message heard loudly to retaliate against her sharp practice.

 

  1. Remove all the doors and throw them in the city dump so landlord has to spend money to replace them.
  2. Remove cupboard doors and dispose or cut them up so have to be replaced.
  3. Remove locks and dispose of them so landlords have to spend money to replace them for next tenant.
  4. Cut doors, break windows and split shelves in half so they have to be replaced.
  5. Remove windows and throw out in the city dump.
  6. Mess with electrical wiring and fuse box (costly for landlords to fix).
  7. Put cement down the kitchen, bathroom sinks (landlord would have to replace).
  8. Break any floor or wall tiles so the landlord has to repair to make place decent again.
  9. Holes in the wall would need to be repaired before the landlord could rent the unit again.
  10. Put cement in the toilets or pack with towels to block them up so plumber has to be called in to fix.
  11. Put rotten food in the air ducts to be discovered by next tenant (would need to spend money cleaning vents).
  12. Cut cord on fridge, stove and any appliances left (unplug first).
  13. Sell the fridge, stove and any appliance the landlord owns (landlord would have to replace for next tenant).
  14. Sell the washer and dryer if the unit came with one, or make unusable before you leave
  15. Make a hole in the hot water heater so water drains out and burns out the heating element
  16. Make the furnace in-operable, this can be a costly repair for the landlord
  17. Damage stairs or railings so they have to be replaced by the landlord.
  18. Pour paint and shit on the carpets and floors for the landlord to clean up after you leave.
  19. Leave tons of garbage in the unit for them to clean up.
  20. Plug the sinks and turn the water on to over fill sinks and bathtubs ruining the floors.
  21. Remove and dispose of all of breakers in the electrical panel (landlord would have to replace them).
Legislative Authority
Section 18 of the ODSP Act

Section 51(1) of the ODSP Regulation

Summary of Directive
Income support is not subject to garnishment, attachment, execution,seizure or receivership.
Income support is not subject to alienation or transfer by the recipient.
The Director may deduct a portion of income support to recover the amount of a SDO or a prescribed government debt owed by a member of the benefit unit.
Unless the recipient agrees to the remittance of a greater amount, the total amount deducted by the Director and remitted to the Family Responsibility Office (FRO) cannot exceed the amount prescribed under the regulation.
The prescribed amount is 10 per cent of budgetary requirements and 100per cent of any arrears of income
support under the Ontario Disability Support Act, 1997 or any arrears of basic financial assistance under the

Ontario Works Act, 1997 payable to the recipient.

Intent of Policy

To ensure that a recipient’s income support is protected from seizure and garnishment by creditors or transfer to another party to satisfy a debt.

Application of Policy
This policy applies even if the income support has been paid into an account at a financial institution (i.e. directly deposited into a recipient’s bank account).
 Income support is not subject to garnishment, attachment, execution, seizure or receivership.
We hope you never have to resort to any suggestion on these lists but know how frustrating it is going against a crooked paralegal who is now well known for manipulating the courts, the police and the rules of conduct under the Law society of Upper Canada. This is just another embarrassment to the Law Society members when a one year college program allows a paralegal to break the laws set out for its members.

Walters Falls paralegal operates fraudulent property management firm. Still Harassing tenants !!

Should a paralegal be running a property management company and representing landlords in LTB ?

According to the Landlord & Tenant Act.. NO she doesn’t fit the definition of Landlord and is known to us April Stewart as a Landlord representative instead of Catherine Stewart the LEGAL representative !   COMPLETE MANIPULATION OF THE LTB COURTS

Landlord Legal owner Catherine April Stewart   Catherine April Stewart of Walters Falls, Ontario has been alleged to have been operating a fraudulent property management firm since 2006 when she became a paralegal and joined the Law Society of Upper Canada and was bound by the rules set out by the LSUC.

Stewart claims on her Landlord Legal website about us page, she sold the property management company in 2006 but obviously lied since she is still known to operate the company from Barrie, Ontario to this day although in conflict with the LSUC rules.Stewart uses an email contact system to screen landlord applicants off of her website.

Catherine Stewart, a licensed paralegal with the Law Society of Upper Canada (LSUC) since 2006, has been known to operate the fraudulent property management company under the name Landlord legal from a small cubicle office located at 117 Bayfield Street, Barrie Ontario.

Landlord Legal small office between the buildings.
Landlord Legal small cubicle office in the alley between the 2 buildings.

The property Stewart uses for her conflict of interest paralegal / property management businesses is shared with an account firm and the building is owned by Wendy Kara of Sophia Development Corporation.

The accountants that share the building have been known to receive legal documents that were suppose to be delivered to a secure Legal office but instead ended up in the hands of the other tenants thus unknowingly releasing private and confidential information meant for her legal firm.Another breach of the Rules of Conduct of paralegals for receiving private and confidential legal court documents.

As a licensed paralegal with the LSUC Stewart is suppose to be bound to follow the Paralegal Rules of Conduct set out by the Law Society. Stewart uses her paralegal status along with her property management firm and her boyfriends ex OPP status, private investigator claims and process server company to harass and evict tenants for her landlord clients.

Stewart has been known to file vexatious Civil Court claims in 2013 against Privacy-Violators but abandoned the claims when she filed in the wrong court to have this website shut down for warning the public against her sharp practice tactics against tenants.Stewart will,have to take the matter to Supreme Court of Canada to stop the warnings and publications of her illegal actions and knowingly misleading the Landlord and Tenant Board.

Catherine Stewart has been known to break many of the Paralegal Rules of Conduct, but when Stewart operates the 2 businesses together, they are a conflict of interest according to the Law Society guidelines set out for registered Lawyers and Paralegals.

Conflict of interest

  1. a) Paralegal – Landlord Legal.inc
    b) Property management – Landlord Legal
  2. Insecure legal files being received by other tenants in building
  3. Uses name not registered with LSUC when property manager – April Stewart
  4. Harasses involved parties to court cases she is accused in
  5. Has been known to break into tenants units illegally Read this post : HERE
  6. Has been known to threaten Human Rights applicant who filed claims against her on her website
  7. Has been known to submit false evidence into Human Rights allegations against her and Paul Smith
  8. Has been known to submit false statements from Paul Smith into Human Rights allegations against them
Search Results
The information in this directory was prepared end of day, Wednesday, November 30, 2016.
Please see this important notice for information about the frequency of updates and the content of this directory.
Click on the name of the lawyer or paralegal to view information including contact information, and discipline history, trusteeship and practice restriction information, if applicable.
Each listing includes the practicing status of the lawyer or paralegal. See status definitions for more information.
New Search Total records returned for this search: 1
Full Name Licence Type City Postal Code Status
Definitions
Main Area(s) of Law/Legal Services
Descriptions
Catherine April Stewart Paralegal Barrie L4M 3B3 In Private Practice LAND-TEN

Catherine Stewart’s Law Society profile can be found listed at the LSUC public portal HERE

Stewart has been known to sign April Stewart (not legal name) to legal court documents and then refuses to honor agreements she makes under her fraudulent property management company making tenants she goes after, waste court time, waste tenants money and knowingly breaches the LSUC Rules of Conduct again in doing so. As a paralegal she can not make and sign agreements and then deliberately not honor them costing the other parties monies to collect. This is another complaint put forth in the new LSUC complaints filed against her.

Stewart is known to refer to herself as a “Landlord representative” in LTB hearings not  a legal representative !!
Stewart is known to manipulate the LTB courts constantly and breaches the rules of conduct for her landlord clients.

Diane Smith has been known to work for Catherine Stewart in the past and is a disgraced paralegal who also operated a paralegal firm under different names and failed to show up for the Law Society hearing when complaints were filed against her. Diane Smith sold her house on Masters Drive in Barrie and was alleged to have moved to New Market with her son before the Law Society could catch up with her.
smith
Read the LSUC determination against Diane Smith and the fines set out HERE.

Read the story Diane Lynn Smith of Barrie practiced law illegally under several names !

 

There has been numerous reports of this “SHARP PRACTICE” tactic done by paralegal Catherine Stewart.
If you would like to learn what Sharp Practice is then please read this post HERE.

   The Canada Revenue Agency, after being contacted by us about possible tax fraud, stated it has no listed business or tax records of Stewart’s property management company she runs in conjunction with her paralegal firm.

There was also no business records or tax records for Paul Smith, Stewart’s alleged ex OPP boyfriend or husband operating a Private Investigator company, and acting as Process Server for over 10 years for his paralegal girlfriend.

Catherine Stewart, who works for landlords only, has also been known to break rules under the Business Act, when Stewart uses two separate names for running her fraudulent scheme.

Catherine April Stewart is also known to call herself a Landlord Advocate and the “Terminator” when she attacks tenants rights that are set out in the Landlord and Tenant Act 2006 and the Human Rights Code.

Catherine Stewart does not fit the definition of a “Landlord” under the act and again is in conflict with the LSUC when she knowingly appears for landlords at LTB hearings.

Catherine Stewart defended herself and ex OPP boyfriend Paul Smith, against Human Rights allegations brought up against them by a tenant in 2013.

The Paralegal Rules of Conduct set out by the LSUC can be read here : PARALEGAL RULES OF CONDUCT

New complaints have again been filed with the Law Society to look into the Sharp practice tactics, harassment, conflict of interest, false testimony and false evidence submitted by Catherine Stewart in the Human Rights allegations brought up against her and her ex OPP boyfriend Paul Smith, who operated as a Private Investigator when he was not legal or licensed to do so.

We will of course be following the LSUC complaints to see what if anything the Law Society does to protect the public and court participants against illegal tactics of this paralegal who took a 1 year college course to get her paralegal license and manipulates the law and the rules for her landlord clients.

This paralegal definitely puts the Law Society in disrepute with her Sharp Practice and illegal methods.

   Please continue to email us details when you encounter this paralegal or her ex OPP boyfriend when they try to evict you.The new series, entitled The Stewart Solution might have some interesting tactics you can use against Catherine Stewart or April Stewart and her landlord clients. You can take or leave the advice we give to tenants in the new upcoming articles.

The Stewart Solution series will be published soon to give tenants some ideas of what you can do, or what you can destroy, and get away with it legally when you get harassed by this lowlife paralegal (in our opinion).

FIGHT TO PROTECT YOUR RIGHTS !!  Nobody else is going to do it for you.

How do you defend the rights of landlords when you harass, deceive and infringe on tenants Human Rights.

Catherine Stewart is a self proclaimed Landlord rights advocate and self proclaimed “terminator” and is a fraud !!

Paralegals and what is known as “SHARP PRACTICE”

This post refers to the term “Sharp Practice” in relationship to the Law Society of Upper Canada (LSUC) Rules of Conduct, for paralegals and lawyers, refers to and occurs when the LSUC licensed parties use methods to abuse the process of legal proceedings that are not following the rules of the Law Society, not warranted, not standardized or legal, meant to hide their clients and disrupt or delay ANY legal proceedings or ANY COURT matters they are involved in !!.

Sharp practice is a pejorative phrase to describe sneaky or cunning behavior that is technically within the rules of the law but borders on being unethical

Gaming the system (also referred to as gaming the rules, bending the rules, abusing the system, cheating the system, milking the system, playing the system, or working the system) can be defined as using the rules and procedures meant to protect a system in order, instead, to manipulate the system for a desired outcome

Legal abuse refers to abuses associated with both civil and criminal legal action. Abuse can originate from nearly any part of the legal system, including frivolous and vexatious litigants, abuses by law enforcement, incompetent, careless or corrupt attorneys and misconduct from the judiciary itself.

Legal abuse is responsible not only for injustice, but also harm to physical, psychological and societal health

Vexatious litigation is legal action which is brought, regardless of its merits, solely to harass or subdue an adversary. It may take the form of a primary frivolous lawsuit or may be the repetitive, burdensome, and unwarranted filing of meritless motions in a matter which is otherwise a meritorious cause of action. Filing vexatious litigation is considered an abuse of the judicial process and may result in sanctions against the offender.

A single action, even a frivolous one, is usually not enough to raise a litigant to the level of being declared vexatious. Rather, a pattern of frivolous legal actions is typically required to rise to the level of vexatious. Repeated and severe instances by a single lawyer or firm can result in eventual disbarment.

SHARP PRACTICE is frowned upon by the Law Society of Upper Canada Rules of Conduct.Many Paralegals and Lawyers use Sharp Practice in their legal firms participation in the legal system further causing back logs of legal proceedings needlessly in defense of their firm or their clients.

Examples of Sharp Practice, is not showing, or notifying parties, using acting agents, locksmiths and other parties related to their cause, that have NO PHYSICAL BUSINESS ADDRESS anywhere, to deliver Court Summonses when they are, or clients are involved in legal proceedings.

Remember SHARP Practice = do whatever it takes, does not matter if they present at, or commit a criminal act, the LSUC rules, the Criminal Code, PIPEDA, Chart Rights, Human Rights or the Rules and procedures in any court proceeding you or your client are involved in.

Should you breach other peoples INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS if your a well known LANDLORD ONLY RIGHTS ACTIVIST  ?
Rights are for everybody…not just landlords !

How do you justify defending the rights of anyone… when you are alleged to have constantly violate the rights of others ??

Eviction Specialist, C A Stewart of Landlord legal inc refused to accept her alleged boyfriends Paul t Smith summons issued June 2013, delivered to her legal office at 117 Bayfield Street when Smith acted as an agent on Landlord legal inc behalf and her law firm was directly involved in the LTB Tribunal, and HR matters the tenant had filed.

Eviction Specialist, C A Stewart of Landlord legal inc, uses agents or sub contractors companies like Paul Richardsons’ Central Lock & Key, that has NO BRICK & MORTAR STORE, to enter tenants units, change locks and other duties she needs done. Central Lock & Key were hard to get a summons served to, as they are MOBILE UNIT ONLY and Mr Richardson son, Cody Richardson threatened the tenant. and tried to hit his vehicle with the Central lock & Key company van while attempting to serve them summonses for Superior Court Civil matters.

Paul Richardson saves a phone recording for 2 years from attempts to get him served for LTB matters in 2013, and lies about the date of the recording, and plays it on the witness stand to allegedly deceive the court, and help C A Stewarts Dykstra clients in court.

Using “acting agents” or “sub contractors” that are next to impossible to summons, or that paralegals can block access to, is a very common practice done among paralegals and lawyers who practice SHARP PRACTICE frowned by the LSUC.

Landlord Legal signs and enters testimony and allegations from Rob Scruton that have not been heard in any court, not even once into Dykstra civil matters.

Landlord Legal enters and serves documents, evidence and her signed statement of Scrutons testimony breaking rules of procedures and rules of a fair proceeding.

Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal, and her clients Ralph Dykstra, William Dykstra and Donald Dykstra of Dykstra Bros Electric, DO NOT SHOW AGAIN for the motions to dismiss the evidence and testimony Stewart entered against the rules of procedures for civil hearing SCC#1852-13.

Landlord Legal places Rob Srcuton on her witness list, though she serves against the rules by not giving “proper notice” or the required “will says” to interview the surprise witness from Innisfil, Ontario, Canada. Stewart does this surprise tactic less than 2 weeks before a hearing date. All evidence and will says were court ordered to be delivered to all parties prior to the Landlord Legal inc tactic used.

Catherine Stewart should have known or aught to have known the rules of procedures for small claims court.

Catherine Stewart of landlord legal should have known or aught to have known it was wrong to sign affidavits for her witness, Rob Scruton, when Stewart is directly involved in the Civil proceedings and Human Rights allegations against her firm. False testimony and conflict of interest concerns and allegations just to influence a proceeding Landlord legal and her Dykstra clients are directly involved in.

Catherine Stewart of Landlord legal should have known or aught to have known the testimony she signed for Rob Scruton had never seen one day in court, but enters his testimony she signed anyways to a legal proceeding she was involved in directly.

Paul T Smith, retired OPP officer of 30 years is another witness NOT ON THE WITNESS LIST EITHER, Catherine Stewart of landlord legal inc has not provided proper notice or the will says, for her alleged boyfriend. Paul T Smith ends up on the stand in civil court Dec 2015, for C A Sewarts Dykstra clients, although he is connected to breaching Human Rights while acting as an agent for Landlord legal and Dykstra Bros Electric,  and had absolutely no knowledge of the allegations in her Dykstra clients proceedings.

Landlord Legal should have known it was wrong to keep using alleged boyfriend Paul Smith, to serve the documents against the rules of procedures, when her alleged boyfriend and Stewart have pending Human rights allegations against them since May 2014.

After not showing for the motions to dismiss the evidence, Stewart has the motions heard the same day and in front of the same Judge hearing the Dykstra hearing.

Stewart also files another motion to split ( after motioning to join ) her personal SCC#1851-13 civil matter filed the same day as Dykstras claim, which Stewart was  told by the Judge in March 2014, was filed in the wrong court to deal with her demands to have this website shut down.Filed Oct 2013 and still in the wrong court in February 0f 2016…can you say harassment and vexatious

Landlord Legal motions to bring her personal civil matter to be heard with her clients in 2014, HR applicant demanding rights to a speedy trial hearing

Paralegals and Lawyers have an obligation to Minimize costs during ALL legal proceedings against ANY party.

Paralegals and Lawyers have the obligation to HONOR UNDERTAKINGS they have agreed to and have signed on behalf of their clients.

Paralegals and Lawyers have the obligation to protect confidential and privileged information and documents they have obtained.

Paralegals and lawyers have the obligation to follow ALL THE RULES OF CONDUCT of the Law Society of Upper Canada.

Paralegals and Lawyers have the obligation to follow THE RULES OF PROCEDURES in all legal proceedings.

Licensed Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to have known all the Rules and Regulations of the ;

  1. Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO)
  2. Criminal Code of Canada
  3. Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (CDSA)
  4. Personal Information and Electronic Document Act (PIPEDA)
  5. Residential Tenancies Act 2006 (RTA)
  6. Rules of Procedure in ALL COURTS representing any party
  7. Rules of Conduct (LSUC)
  8. Should be Knowledgeable in the area they practice

Paralegals and Lawyers should not or should know NOT TO THREATEN or harass parties they are involved in proceedings against with CRIMINAL ARREST, FURTHER LEGAL THREATS, NO TRESPASS OR NO CONTACT LETTERS or any kind of threat meant to harm the other party or to delay, coerce or influence the proceedings they are involved in.

Catherine-StewartLandlord Legal inc owner has openly threatened an ex tenant with criminal charges on her Landlord legal website while Human Rights/Civil allegations pending ( http://landlordlegal.ca DEC 2015 to Jan 22nd 2016) of her paralegal firm, alleged boyfriend and Dykstra Bros electric owners allegedly have been defending alleged discrimination against the Human Rights of the tenant.

Images showing the serious threats to the ex tenant, Tenant Rights Applicant and the Human Rights Applicant made from the owner, Catherine April Stewart,for Landlord Legal inc publicly advertised paralegal services website threatening CRIMINAL CHARGES after numerous unsubstantiated and FALSE ALLEGATIONS made to the Barrie Police.
Read the posts surrounding the Barrie police confrontations and the paralegals attempts to have the Human Rights Applicant charged with anything !!:  http://privacy-violators.com/the-posts-watcher/do-barrie-police-continue-to-harass-ex-tenant-for-barrie-paralegal-catherine-april-stewart/Barrie police logo

Barrie police refuse to charge the paralegal numerous times with the numerous unsubstantiated and false allegations she makes, of the ongoing harassment, allegations of false documents submitted for legal proceedings or for Applicant to press criminal harassment charges for the break in and illegal lock change witnessed by attending police officers and instructing paralegal that she had NO RIGHT or LEGAL DOCUMENT required to enter 40 Ellen Street, Barrie Ont on August 15th 2013. when Catherine Stewart and the Dykstras’ were present and proceeded to order the locksmith to cut security chain and enter unit illegally.

 

Landlord Legal website.

Catherine Stewart, owner of Landlord Legal filed civil matters Oct 2013 against the ex tenant, knowing of the pending HUMAN RIGHTS matters, amended the SCC 1851-13 application after a year to a personal claim, being told the matter was in the wrong court and needed to go to a higher court to deal with the publication of legal proceedings against her and her Dykstra Bros Electric company of Barrie clients.

Catherine Stewart has locksmiths attend to remove locks after 2 Barrie police officers tell Landlord Legal, that it is  “not legal” and “no proper documentation” to do so, but DOES ANYWAYS  illegally but states on her website the proper way to get to the SHERIFFS’ office and get the proper paperwork… We figured it is a case of “do as I say and not as I do , or teach”. 

Catherine A Stewart of Landlord legal also gives lectures that instructs and teaches landlords not to put tenants on the defensive as well, and to “GO LOOK IN THE WINDOWS WHEN TENANT NOT HOME. wow, can anyone say Trespassing,not to mention teaching  landlords, real estate persons, agents and other attendees a serious tenant invasion of privacy.

Catherine Stewarts personal SCC1851-13 allegations are still pending, and are public record, as of Feb 2016 and after filing original claim in Oct 2013, to delay the Law Society complaints, and Human Rights allegations against her company, her alleged boyfriend, and Dykstra Bros Electric owners’.

The SCC1851-13 civil matter filed by C A Stewart is still pending, as Stewart has taken NO ACTION after being told it was IN THE WRONG court.

Catherine Stewart also claimed she had hired David Strashin to represent her for the higher court in July 2014 but again has not taken any action to further her claims.

The Applicant has claimed his Charter Rights, Fundamental Freedoms 2(b) and will continue to defend the public forums, open court and HR publicized findings in all proceedings he is involved in with Catherine Stewart, Paul T Smith,Ralph Dykstra,Donald Dykstra and William Dykstra.

The paralegal should have informed her clients the LTB, Civil and Human Rights are public forums and public documents to the proceedings and freedom of information requested are public documents as stated on the bottom of the LTB forms and additional forms filed for proceedings and can be used as such.

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to know not to create “CONFLICT of INTEREST” and if so, to remove themselves from ALL legal proceedings they are directly involved in.

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to know they are to advise clients and not act illegally for the clients they represent.

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to know they are to advise and regulate those clients on how to behave during proceedings with courtesy, civility, integrity and honor and not bring unrelated matters, disrupt proceedings with threats, unsubstantiated claims or any other method used to intimidate or influence a proceeding.

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to know they are not allowed to be present at or participate in illegal acts like break ins or illegal lock changes.

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to know it is wrong and against the rules of procedures to block all CONTACT when the legal representative has come on record and has the obligation to receive legal documents required for legal proceedings without justifiable reasons or a properly applied for peace bond, injunction or court order that states the reasons and the remedy.

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to know NOT TO FILE vexatious legal proceedings meant to delay proceedings and harm applicants financial situation causing further intentional harm.

Paralegals and lawyers should know or aught to know the rules and responsibility governing minimizing losses and the rules for UNDERTAKINGS.

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to know to “CONTACT” other parties involved if “NOT ATTENDING” within a reasonable amount of time, to not further costs from “witness fees”, waste the “courts time” and waste  “applicants time”

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to know the rules and, to be civil, courteous and respectful to everyone, and to respect ALL RIGHTS given to the Applicants or Respondents in any legal proceeding.

PIPEDA and your practice

Paralegals and Lawyers should have known or aught to have known to act with Civility,Integrity and Honesty at all times when dealing with another party or their representatives.

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to have known it was wrong and illegal to enter or misrepresent documents or information into legal proceedings when the document does NOT EXIST in any stated court files.

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to have known to keep confidential documents, court evidence and other privileged legal information secured and away from other tenants they rent to in the same building as their LEGAL OFFICES.

Meaford office closed June 2015

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to know to CONTACT legal proceedings and ALL PARTIES, they have come ON RECORD for the proceedings with phone,fax, and contact information and to NOTIFY ALL PROCEEDINGS of ANY CHANGES to office closures and changes to the information they had provided to the courts and the opposing parties.

Landlord Legal cubicle officeCatherine Stewart of Landlord Legal rents 2 buildings to an account company firm, who has received many confidential legal documents unsecured several times on behalf of Catherine Stewart of Landlord legal inc, from hand deliveries and process severs.

Paralegals and Lawyers who switch offices, and block communication from parties involved in legal proceedings are in fact breaking the rules of procedures, hiding their clients and preventing the ease of communication meant to make legal proceedings transparent, easier and straight forward is one form of known  “HARD PRACTICE”.

There are a lot of paralegals that do “SHARP PRACTICE” to make sure their clients have an edge over the Applicants to further financial stress, hinder, delay and frustrate the involved parties and interfere with the legal processes.

Read the stories surrounding Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal and her clients, Ralph Dykstra, Landlord Legal owner Catherine April StewartWilliam Dykstra, Donald Dykstra, owners of Dykstra Bros Electric of Barrie as well as the allegations against Landlord legal and Catherine Stewart, use your judgement and see if you feel that Landlord legal inc uses the frowned upon Hard Practices in her legal firm.

Let Privacy Violators know of ANY paralegal or Lawyer that you have been involved with uses methods listed here on our website to gain advantages over the other party they are involved with in legal proceedings.

The Human Rights allegations against Ralph Dykstra, William Dykstra and Donald Dykstra of Dykstra Bros Electric company of Barrie, Ontario started in 2013 and proceedings continue at the HRTO as of January 20th 2016 when David Strashin, apparently came on record but has not notified the HRTO or involved parties of this fact and according to the HRTO Rules of Procedures during proceedings.

The Human Rights allegations against Paul Smith, Catherine Stewart and Landlord Legal  paralegal firm of Barrie, Ontario started in 2013 and proceedings continue at the HRTO as of January 20th 2016, when David Strashin, apparently came on record to represent the LTB paralegal who has represented, and delayed the Dykstra Bros allegations, for the last 3 years, in HRTO, but has not notified the HRTO or involved parties of this fact according to the HRTO Rules of Procedures.

With the HR Applicant filing many LSUC allegations, complaints, and concerns starting back from May 24th 2013, with many more complaints to file up to February 2016, Landlord legal has not even been investigated once in the last 3 years by the Law Society of Upper Canada, or the Barrie police from the many complaints filed by the applicant while waiting for the pending HR matter to finish.
Stewart had in Oct 2013 blocked the Law Society complaints by filing and stalling vexatious claims to delay the complaints and the human Rights allegations filed against her legal firm, boyfriend and her Dykstra clients.

3 years and STILL working as a paralegal in our legal system, with many pending unanswered allegations, including illegal entry, illegal lock change, abuse of process allegations, Rules of procedures breaches,entering false documents into legal proceedings allegations, harassment allegations, threatening, coercing and the Human Rights allegations against her legal firm, boyfriend and her Dykstra Bros Electric clients, but still in the legal system.

The HR applicant has requested a time extension from the Law Society of Upper Canada, to file the many allegations and concerns regarding Landlord legal inc, Howard Tavroges and new claims against David Strashin of Toronto. Read the posts on the Law Society of Upper Canada refusing to investigate complaints filed June 2013 against Landlord legal inc

The Law Society of Upper Canada complaints filed against Howard Tavroges, and Catherine Stewart of Landlord legal inc of 117 Bayfield Street, Barrie have been delayed when Stewart claims over legal proceedings are ongoing and the LSUC delayed investigating the May 2013 claims brought forth by the ex tenant over privacy invasion and illegal break in and illegal lock change after a mediated settlement July 18 2013 in LTB Tribunal matters.

Additional methods known to be Sharp Practice will be added to the above compilation as time and need to educate warrant it.

Report Sharp practice and additional  methods used here and we can discuss the rise in court proceedings caused by the needless delays of the paralegal or Lawyers involved.

CHARTER OF RIGHTS
Section 2(b)
Freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication

You have the right to think and believe what you want. You have the right to express those thoughts, without being afraid of being punished or silenced. The Supreme Court of Canada has said these freedoms are important for:

self-fulfillment
participation in social and political decision-making
the free exchange of ideas

Freedom of the press is essential in a democracy. Newspapers and other media are an important way for people to learn about what is going on and express their ideas.

Section 15.

Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

Upper Law Society of Canada refused to investigate legitimate tenant complaints

THE DIRECTOR OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF UPPER CANADA REFUSED TO INVESTIGATE LEGITIMATE COMPLAINTS !!

Catherine-StewartPrivacy-Violators blog has learned that complaints that had been previously filed with the Law Society of Upper Canada, against the owner of Landlord Legal inc, Catherine April Stewart, a P1 private paralegal, operating from offices in Meaford & Barrie Ontario, had continued to be ignored and not investigated though strenuously argued, with many documents submitted to support the complaints.

This is not the first time complaints against Catherine Stewart have been filed with the Upper Law Society of Canada by this ex tenant and they have not been investigated or documented at all. Nowhere can you find out information on HOW MANY TIMES they have investigated or have neglected to investigate legitimate complaints that have been filed against ANY lawyer or paralegal on their website.

** Previous complaint against Diane Smith, of Smith paralegal Services were investigated with the ULSC hearing finding Smith guilty.

When complaints were filed by a Barrie ex tenant last year, against Landlord Legal, Catherine Stewart, the owner had contacted the Law Society intake officer handling the complaint, David Cass, several times on the filed complaints, saying the matter is still in Landlord & Tenant tribunal or had been taken up with the Privacy Commissioner of Canada and had already been dealt with.

ULSC intake officer David Cass dismissed the complaints the tenant had filed without investigating the facts. Another complaint was re filed and asked to be further investigated.

Though Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal had contacted David Cass several times, the Law Society’s intake officer NEVER contacted the ex tenant on the matter except to send a letter dismissing the complaints.

Read ALL the letters and emails received from the Law Society of Canada’s intake officer David Cass to the ex tenant and the tenants responses back to the Law Society on the complaints he had filed against this paralegal last year. Several other tenants have contacted the Privacy-Violators.com website to share similar complaints they have filed with the Law Society against this same paralegal but also not investigated.

The NEWEST COMPLAINTS that have been filed come from an August 15th 2013 incident where Landlord Legal or an agent acting on her behalf, allegedly had called the Barrie Police on a false report to “keep the peace” at 40 Ellen Street, Barrie, Ontario. Read the attending Barrie Police Officers notes obtained from a Freedom of Information request from the ex tenant on the incident report.

The tenant claims Landlord Legal,Catherine Stewart had also called Central Key and Lock from Barrie Ontario, a mobile Cody Robertson-central lock and keylocksmith to enter the unit at 40 Ellen Street, Barrie, Ontario and change the locks without any 24 hour intent to enter, eviction notice, sheriffs order or any other legal right to do so.

** Hence the reason complaints were filed with the Law Society of Upper Canada against Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal inc.

The rental property at 40 Ellen Street, is owned by Ralph Dykstra, Bill Dykstra and Don Dykstra, operating as Dykstra Bros Electric, to whom Stewart had been representing since May 13th 2013 and throughout all the Landlord & Tenant Board Tribunal hearings and the recent Small Claims proceedings Stewart SCC#1851-13 and Dykstras SCC#1852-13 have filed.

April Stewart attempted to withdraw her own civil case and Dykstras civil cases during Motions brought forth May 27th 2014 by the Barrie tenant to file a counter suit. A counter suit for $25,000 is being filed against April Stewart and her clients Dykstra Bros Electric.

The Settlement Conference is to be heard July 11th 2014 on the matter.

Their is no chance for a settlement on these issues and a hearing date will be asked for a judge to hear the matter.

We will continue to keep the updates coming as time prevails. There has been many details to add to our posts to bring everything up to date.

We have asked the complaints with the ULSC to go forward with new documentation being sent to further the investigations requested. Comments from the director about the requests will be published here. we look forward to following the ULSC and the hearings, which we will be present.

Law Society of Upper Canada fails to investigate complaints against Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal inc.

Law Society of Upper Canada

 

 

In this websites opinion

The Upper Law Society of Canada is suppose to be a place where the public goes for protection and takes complaints against lawyers and paralegals to be investigated when rights have been violated or wrong doing has taken place. In our opinion .. What a JOKE !!

The following NEW series of posts will follow ALL the complaints that were filed by a Canadian citizen and tenant in regards to several serious paralegal complaints  filed  in 2013-2014 with the   Upper Law Society of Canada.

The complaints followed in this NEW series of posts were filed in 2013 & 2014 against Landlord Legal inc, Catherine April Stewart, Smith Paralegal Catherine-StewartServices, Diane Smith and the new 2014 complaints being filed with Legal Aid and the Upper Law Society of Canada.

Stewart had claimed there was ongoing court issues and the ULSC delayed the investigation. The two (2) civil claims Catherine Stewart had filed against the ex tenant had no bearing on the reasons for the complaint.

Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal inc had filed her civil court claims on behalf of herself and her clients she represented in the WRONG COURT to have our  PRIVACY-VIOLATORS BLOG SHUT DOWN and ALL the postings removed of the LTB tribunal hearings published and followed here on our Privacy-Violators Blog in addition to $5000 in alleged property damage to her clients, Ralph Dykstra, William Dykstra, Don Dykstra of Dyksytra Bros Electric.

Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal and her clients knew she had called the Barrie police on false pretenses and instructed Central Lock & Key to illegally break into the unit at 40 Ellen Street, Barrie, Ontario after cutting the security chain, gaining entry and removing the locks while the Barrie police stood by and watched the tenants rights being violated and doing nothing to stop the actions or help the harassd tenant from the illegal entry although they also knew Catherine Stewart and her clients had no legal documentation allowing them to enter to support her actions .

“I have 13 years experience and know my job” ~ Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal inc tells Barrie police officers M Beard and Turner

 

Upper Law Society complaint has been re filed against Catherine Stewart for her presence and involvement in the harassment and illegal entry, lock removal incident at 40 Ellen Street, Barrie, Ontario.

* Minimum of $25,000 fine and 1 year suspension if Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal found guilty of the complaint against her

* If found guilty of the Human Rights claim HRTO #17699-I filed by the ex tenant against C A Stewart of Landlord legal inc and her employee Paul Smith, Stewart will lose her paralegal license and no longer able to practice law.

Further legal actions against the Queen, Attorney General, the Barrie police and Central lock & Key of Barrie are still pending and will ALL be followed here on Privacy-Violators Blog as they are filed and heard in court.

New complaints being filed against Catherine April Stewart and Howard Tavroges, for “Conflict of interest” and client confidentiality issues raised when he negotiated an agreement July 15th in LTB tribunal with Dawn Lewis, tenant and Stewart of landlord Legal and the tenant had to sue Catherine Stewart and her clients to retrieve the money owed from the agreement in Landlord & Tenant Board hearing in Barrie.

Catherine Stewart further sent threatening letter to Michael Hefferon, of Upper Law Society of Canada actions against the Community Legal clinic for representing the tenant after C A Stewart of Landlord Legal alleged he was connected to website activities known only to Howard Tavroges mentioned in confidential client interviews.

The tenant had filed a civil case #1546-13 against Dykstra Bros Electric to retrieve the funds owed from mediation that was arranged by Howard Tavroges and Stewart and Tavroges was doing Landlord and Tenant Board work for Catherine Stewart at the same time as the tenant is in civil court with Catherine April Stewart and Dykstra Bros Electric for the July 15th 2013 Sean Henry Order.

 ALL the original complaints that have been filed with the Law Society of Upper Canada, will be posted in this series, along with the actual responses that were received from the Law Society of Upper Canada’s, “INTAKE COUNCIL OFFICERS”, David Cass, Yvonne Skilton and the recent responses received from the Director of the Professional Regulation Division on the “handling” of the complaints that were filed and “investigated” against Catherine April Stewart, from one of its intake officers’, David Cass

David W. Cass
Intake Counsel
The Law Society of Upper Canada
Osgoode Hall
130 Queen Street West
Toronto, Ontario
M5H 2N6
Tel.: (416) 947-3300 x2440
1-800-668-7380 x2440
Fax: (416) 947-3382

Yvonne Skilton
Investigator
The Law Society of Upper Canada
Osgoode Hall 130 Queen Street West
Toronto ON M5H 2N6
Tel (416)-947-3300 Ext 2099
Fax (416)-947-3990
yskilton@lsuc.on.ca

Director of the Professional Regulation Division : PRDDirectorsOffice@lsuc.on.ca

Lawyers and licensed paralegals must comply with the Law Society Act and all related governance legislation, including regulations and by-laws and the Rules of Professional Conduct or Paralegal Rules of Conduct.”

Generally, we are concerned with issues relating to the service, ethics and honesty of lawyers and licensed paralegals”

Complaints and emails to the Director of the Professional Regulation Division – organizing and uploaded soon for the new series of posts
 
Complaints and emails to David Cass – Law Society of Canada – Intake Officer
Complaints and emails to Yvonne Skilton – Law Society of Upper Canada – Intake Officer

Follow these interesting posts and see how the Law Society of Upper Canada failed to handle these complaints !

Paralegals and Lawyers should not or should know NOT TO THREATEN parties they are involved in proceedings against with CRIMINAL ARREST, FURTHER LEGAL THREATS or any kind of threat meant to harm the other party or to delay, coerce or influence the proceedings they are involved in.

Landlord Legal has openly threatened an ex tenant with criminal charges on her Landlord legal website while Human Rights/Civil allegations pending ( http://landlordlegal.ca DEC 2015 to Jan 22nd 2016) of her paralegal firm, alleged boyfriend and Dykstra Bros electric owners allegedly have been defending alleged discrimination against the Human Rights of the tenant.lANDLORD-LEGAL-website-page

Images showing the serious threats to the ex tenant, Tenant Rights Applicant and the Human Rights Applicant made from the owner, Catherine April Stewart,for Landlord Legal inc publicly advertised paralegal services website threatening CRIMINAL CHARGES after numerous unsubstantiated and FALSE ALLEGATIONS made to the Barrie Police..

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to know not to create “CONFLICT of INTEREST” and if so, to remove themselves from ALL legal proceedings they are directly involved in.

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to know they are to advise clients and not act illegally for the clients they represent.

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to know they are not allowed to be present at or participate in illegal acts like break ins or illegal lock changes.

Have a complaint to file against a lawyer or paralegal ?  GOOD LUCK !!

We will update as the new complaints against Catherine Stewart and Howard Tavroges are filed and report on the progress

Diane Lynn Smith of Barrie practiced law illegally under several names !

Law Society of Upper CanadaThe complaints to the Upper Law Society of Canada, against Diane Smith of Smith Paralegal Services, were originally filed on June 8th 2013.

A Barrie tenant alleged that Diane Smith had harassed him by sending a letter representing herself as a legal “lawyer” and representative for Nancy Groves, when she was not legal to do so.

In the complaint to the Upper Law Society of Canada (ULSC)  it had come to light that Diane Smith had been practicing law, but her Paralegal license was not in good standing with the ULSC for her to do so.

It was also determined that Smith Paralegal Services was engaging in professional misconduct when she harassed a tenant who was involved in several pending court cases with his landlords and had sent the letter that made references to her fees as “Attorney fees”.

Upon filing a civismithl claim in Barrie against Smith paralegal Services, an investigation has revealed that Diane Smith had been advertising and practicing law in Ontario under the name Diane Merry Paralegal Services, with the same address and cell number that had used in her other law practice.

There are no records for Diane Merry of Merry Paralegal Services, 58 Masters Drive, Barrie listed in the Upper Law Society of Canada   “Lawyer and Paralegal Directory“.

ALWAYS CHECK THE LEGAL STATUS AND COMPLAINTS FOR ANY LAWYER OR PARALEGAL YOU HIRE, OR HAS CONTACTED YOU FOR ANY MATTER !

Further investigation has revealed that Diane Smith had sold or transferred her home at 58 Masters Drive, Barrie, Ontario, to M Phillips, on November 1 st, 2013, a couple of weeks before Diane Smith was scheduled to appear in front of the  Upper Law Society Hearing Panel December 13th, 2013.

Diane Smith DID NOT APPEAR before the ULSC panel to answer for the allegations against her and now appears to be hiding her assets, knowing the outcome of the ULSC allegations and pending lawsuits filed against her.

Other addresses or associated businesses that Smith Paralegal Services has been connected with;

Justice Served
125 Anne Street South
Barrie, Ontario
L4N 7B6

Smith Paralegal Services
58 Masters Drive
Barrie, Ont
L4M 6 W9

D Merry Paralegal Services
58 Masters Drive
Barrie, Ontario
L4M 6W9

Did Howard Tavroges violate Client Privilege & Privacy Rights working for Landlord Legal inc at same time as her civil lawsuits and allegations ?

NEW UPCOMING NEWS AND POSTS

Howard tavrogesWe will be looking into and releasing new posts on Howard Tavroges, and his new job with Catherine April Stewart of Landlord Legal in Barrie Landlord and Tenant tribunal with Privacy allegations and conflict of interest issues being raised against Tavroges.

Howard Tavroges Upper Law Society of Canada recent profile was changed and now shows as a private practice with a Barrie address, but Tavroges has knowingly kept the Community Legal Clinic phone number and fax number (deceiving people) , listed on the Upper Law Society website, although he knows that he no longer works for the clinic since last year and has additional confidential information concerning the tenants pending court actions against C A Stewart and her clients, Dykstra Bros Electric.

The tenant has noted this and many more details in his inquires to the ULSC over  many concerns about Howard Tavroges and April Stewart of landlord legal that need to be answered.

** Not to mention the huge PRIVACY CONFLICTS & CONFLICT OF INTEREST allegations brought up in the Ntavrogese-image_400x400EW and pending complaints to the Upper Law Society of Canada concerning Landlord legal inc and Howard Tavroges.

We are looking at all the legal options the Barrie tenant has against Howard Tavroges & April Stewart of Landlord legal inc after our private investigation revealed disturbing and serious conflicts of interest issues with April Stewarts, interests and letters, to the legal clinic of his private business affairs, only known to Howard Tavroges when he represented, advised and mediated for the tenant previously in LTB case against Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal inc.

We will be releasing an update to the previous civil case SCC #1546-13.. Dykstras lose motions.. finally paid July 25th 2013 Sean Henry court order.

We will be releasing an update to the August 2013 ULSC complaints previously filed against Catherine April Stewart of Landlord legal inc.

We will be releasing an update on “How The Upper Law Society of Canada Investigates Your Complaints !”

We will be releasing an update to the SCC #1852-13 case that April Stewart of Landlord legal inc had filed on behalf of Dykstra Bros Electric against their tenant. ** Stewart asks to withdraw case..Barrie Tenant files $25,000 counter claim

We will be releasing an update to the SCC #1851-13 case that Stewart filed for herself against a Barrie tenant. ** Stewart asks to withdraw case.. Barrie Tenant files $25,000 counter claim

We will be releasing an update and details to the $25,000 counter claim filed by the tenant against April Stewart & Dykstra Bros Electric

We will be releasing an update and details to the pending Central lock & Key of Barrie civil lawsuit being filed.

We will be releasing an update and details to to Privacy-Violators intent to file a Lawsuit to defend its Constitutional Rights against April Stewart & Dykstra Bros Electric when Stewart sent a Cease and Desist letter and interfered with its operations without obtaining a proper court injunction.

We will be releasing an update and details to the Best Hosting Canada.com intent to file a class action lawsuit for all the accounts that are on its servers, against April Stewart and Dykstra Bros Electric for infringing and interfering with its business operations and the websites Constitutional Rights when April Stewart sent a Cease and Desist letter without obtaining a proper court injunction.

We will be releasing an update and details of the Barrie tenants intentions of filing a lawsuit against the Queen and the Attorney General for the Barrie Police conduct and Tenants Rights violations stemming from an  incident involving Ralph Dykstra, Bill Dykstra, Don Dykstra, Central Lock & key and April Stewart at the Dykstras property at 40 Ellen Street,Barrie Ontario,August 15th 2013.

We will be releasing an update on the Human Rights HRTO #16250-13 case filed December 2013 against Ralph Dykstra, Bill Dykstra and Don Dykstra of Dykstra Bros Electric inc.

We will be releasing an update on the Human Rights case HRTO # 17699-14 filed May 2014 against April Stewart of Landlord Legal and her employee Paul Smith, who disclosed personal, confidential and private Medical Marihuana Access Program information in front of birthday guests during an intent to enter on May 23rd 2013.  * April Stewart had a do not contact or enter her properties against the tenant and also refused the summons from the Barrie Police for her employee, Paul Smith when it was issued for the CET #33911-13 LTB hearing in June 2013.

We will be releasing NEW POSTS on other Privacy violations we have found.

Did Executive Director Micheal Hefferon, lawyer Holly Gnomes and law student James Roundell  from the Community Legal Clinic in Orillia break ULSC rules for not protecting their client by not disclosing Howard Tavroges worked for Catherine April Stewart of Landlord Legal inc.while the Community Legal Clinic represented the tenant against C A Stewart and her clients in a Civil Court matter SCC #1546-13 to retrieve funds originally mediated by Howard Tavroges on July 15th 2013 with Catherine Stewart ?

71 Colborne Street East
P.O Box 275
Orillia, Ontario
L3V 6J6

Orillia: 705-326-6444
Toll Free: 1-800-461-8953
Fax: 705-326-9757

Toll Free Fax: 1-877-326-9757

 

Email: info@communitylegalclinic.ca

– See more at: http://www.communitylegalclinic.ca/content.aspx?pID=283#sthash.JdCFPv4Y.dpuf

We are asking the Upper Law Society of Canada that very question!!

We are asking for the ULSC to explain the rules of  client privileged information, conflict of interest and paralegal privacy violations with the NEW claims brought forward to investigate C A Stewart for her involvement in the August 15th 2013 lock removal incident which she had called the Barrie police on false pretenses and they stood and watched as the tenants rights were violated .

We will press the issue and continue to update these posts as they are completed.

We will be releasing details of Barrie tenants intent at legal actions against Mike Harris of Coin Hoarders Treasury, a commercial tenant of Dykstra Bros Electric with allegations of illegally monitoring the tenant for Dykstra Bros Electric use, throughout the tenants ordeals last year between Ralph Dykstra, Don Dykstra and Bill Dykstra.

We will be releasing an update and additional details to the Civil Court Claim #766 filed against Diane Smith paralegal. AKA Diane Merry Paralegal

 LOTS TO READ… LOTS TO LEARN !!

STAND UP AND PROTECT YOUR RIGHTS !!

Walter’s Falls paralegal and husband file lies and false evidence in HRTO allegations..claims absolute privilege

Catherine Stewart, a Walter’s Falls Ontario paralegal and her husband, Paul Smith, who had Human Rights allegations (HRTO#17699-14) filed against them for violating tenants rights in 2014 used the system to file false testimony and false evidence to circumvent the allegations.

Walter's falls Ontario, home of Catherine stewart and Paul Smith

April Stewart, self proclaimed Landlord rights advocate and Human Rights violator
47-year-old April Stewart is known as the privacy violator

Catherine April Stewart, a licensed paralegal registered with the Law Society of Ontario, claims to be an eviction specialist and a landlord only advocate, but also runs a small property management company from a small cubicle office located at 117 Bayfield Street in Barrie Ontario.

As a property management company, Catherine Stewart refuses to allow any of the tenants she manages for her landlord only clients to enter her offices or to contact her over ANY tenant issues. A very strange rule for a legitimate property manager running a business representing clients to their tenants.

Catherine Stewart was present at a break and enter, ordered and committed by the paralegal, when she ordered a Barrie locksmith to enter a tenant’s residence without the legal right to do so which was witnessed by Barrie police officer’s Melanie Beard and officer Turner, who both refused to press charges against her when the tenant insisted they do so.

Read the police report from the officers and the many articles of violations that this paralegal commits, all in her self proclaimed status of being the “terminator”.

Being present and ordering the break and enter is another violation of the Law Society but the complaint that was filed in 2013 does not even appear anywhere on her profile to warn the public. David Cass headed that complaint off and refused to hear it even though the police reports were submitted to the law society to prove the claims.

Catherine Stewart is also known to use and sign the name April Stewart in the LTB hearings, which is not registered with the Law Society to practice law and then fails to honor any agreement she makes to make the tenant waste time and money going after the order she had agreed to and signed in the Landlord and tenant board.

Paralegals, according to the Law Society rules, are suppose to honor agreements they make in court which shows you what kind of paralegal Stewart really is when she states in LTB hearings, she is “a landlord representative” NOT LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE, as she does not fit the legal definition of a landlord in LTB and then signs a different name not registered with the law society and continuously fails to honor the agreements she makes.
PUBLIC BEWARE !!

The tenant filed complaints in the LTB courts for the break and enter after he vacated the unit but Catherine Stewart lied to the courts on the hearing day when Stewart sent another paralegal friend claiming to “Be out of the country September 21st 2013”. Witnesses can put Stewart in Meaford, Ontario when she was suppose to be in court to answer for the break and enter allegations.

Catherine Stewart’s husband, Paul Smith has been known to work for Stewart for over 10 years as a process server and other jobs his wife needed done for her property management company named landlord legal, including signing false documents for her to win cases for her landlord clients.

Paul Smith, an alleged retired OPP that has never been proven has been known to act, not only in the capacity of a process server for his paralegal wife, but has been known to enter tenants units every time they plan to evict a tenant for her landlord only clients and completely  photograph the tenants units before the eviction process begins in the LTB courts.

This photographing that Paul Smith does not only violates the Landlord and Tenant board rules but also violates the constitutional rights to privacy that is suppose to protect the tenants and their families.

Paralegal Catherine Stewart’s husband, Paul Smith has been known on several occasions to file false testimony and enter false evidence that is often signed by his paralegal wife or one of her friends in order to manipulate the courts.

When Catherine April Stewart of landlord legal enters this false testimony and false evidence, she is committing a crime, but gets away with it every time when she claims she has “ABSOLUTE PRIVILEGE” as a paralegal to do so.

Paul Smith business card from Landlord Legal, Barrie.

 

 

 

Paul Smith has been known to illegally contact the Human Rights applicant during the time Smith and Stewart had been named in the Human Rights allegations and was presently before the Human Rights Tribunal in Toronto.

Although Paul Smith was directly named in the claim, he contacted the applicant directly which is against the law to harass a HRTO applicant and had made the applicant very concerned for his safety during the ongoing HRTO hearings.

Smith has also been known on numerous occasions to use statements, issued and signed as a private investigator when Paul Smith was not legally licensed to perform as such in Ontario. This alleged ex OPP officer has never had to prove he was a OPP officer or his legal private investigator status that he uses for his paralegal wife’s advantage in the Ontario courts.

Paul Smith even appeared on the stand as a witness in a civil case when he was not involved or even on the witness list that was given to the opposing party before the trial, as ordered by the judge hearing the case.

This pair has continued to get away with their manipulative tactics because Stewart is a paralegal and claims absolute privilege when defending a landlord client or in this case, Stewart and Smith when they were directly named in the Human Rights allegations.

There is definitely something wrong with our court system when a one year graduate gets a paralegal license and can lie, submit false evidence and continue to mock and manipulate the LTB boards and the the Ontario courts, all the while claiming to be a landlord rights advocate.

Law Society of Upper Canada

Many complaints have been filed with the Law Society over paralegal Catherine Stewart’s conduct, false testimony and her entering false evidence into courts, which is illegal in our court system, but if you look at her profile in the Law Society it will not even show one complaint. The Law Society uses its employees like David Cass, to head off any complaints that do come before them.

The Human Rights mediator hearing the allegations against Stewart and her husband for HRTO 16799-14, Mary Truemner stated in the courtroom that Stewart had definitely crossed the line and violated the tenants rights but had upset the applicant with some very ignorant comments in mediation and a very ridiculous proposal for a punishment that it made the applicant walk out of the hearing in disgust.

The Human Rights mediator hearing the case, Mary Truemner had stated Catherine Stewart was guilty and was suggesting that Stewart take an online Human Rights course and put up a Human Rights poster in her office as a remedy for her violations.

This very ridiculous remedy and other aspects of the Human Rights process will be discussed in full for the public to see that the registrar Richard Hennessy and the entire HRTO process in Ontario is a joke.

The HRTO mediator, Mary Truemner refused to hear the false evidence and false statement claims brought up by the applicant although the proper paperwork was submitted to the tribunal. The evidence and witnesses were concrete and could without a doubt prove that Catherine Stewart and her husband Paul Smith submitted the false statements and evidence into the hearings to protect their reputations.

The entire HRTO hearing will be discussed and many of the documents put online to show the public what one year graduates for a paralegal license like Catherine Stewart, will do in our Ontario courts and how they get away with it.

Many documents, statements, evidence submitted and emails received from the Human Rights tribunal of Ontario and the Law Society will be also be posted online to show what the Law Society does to protect paralegals and lawyers when legitimate complaints are filed with their office.

New complaints against Stewart have been filed with the Law Society and we will post all communication, documents and emails received concerning the complaints to further educate the public on how they protect dirty paralegals as long as they pay their fees to the society. You have to ask yourself why so many complaints that can be proven to be filed with them never get heard and never appear on their public profile that is accessible to the public. All we can say is PUBLIC BE AWARE OF THE DECEIT and the COVER UP PRACTICES OF THE LAW SOCIETY !!

We hope that by exposing paralegals like Catherine Stewart, on our website that it will help you understand what a joke our legal system is when you have a one year graduate of a technical college that can manipulate the courts, harass tenants endlessly and proclaim to be an eviction specialist who is a landlord rights advocate.

This paralegal has also been known to threaten the Human Rights applicant openly on her public website she uses to solicit business for her fake property management company while working as a paralegal. Check her website out here and notice her application process to screen applicants is by email only, http://landlorlegal.ca

Please follow the upcoming Human Rights articles soon to be released to learn the truth about our court system in Ontario.It really is a friggin joke.

Upcoming Events

There are no upcoming events at this time.

July 2019
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday
July 1, 2019 July 2, 2019 July 3, 2019 July 4, 2019 July 5, 2019 July 6, 2019 July 7, 2019
July 8, 2019 July 9, 2019 July 10, 2019 July 11, 2019 July 12, 2019 July 13, 2019 July 14, 2019
July 15, 2019 July 16, 2019 July 17, 2019 July 18, 2019 July 19, 2019 July 20, 2019 July 21, 2019
July 22, 2019 July 23, 2019 July 24, 2019 July 25, 2019 July 26, 2019 July 27, 2019 July 28, 2019
July 29, 2019 July 30, 2019 July 31, 2019 August 1, 2019 August 2, 2019 August 3, 2019 August 4, 2019
error: Content is protected !!