Home » The Posts Watcher

Category Archives: The Posts Watcher

About Us

We are a help website with links to some very useful Landlord & Tenant Board, Privacy Commissioner, Upper Law Society links and some interesting posts in the news that you can view and follow.

logo_twitter follow us on facebook logo_googleemail us

Categories

Is retired OPP officer, Paul T Smith doing illegal searches for Landlord Legal?

Ex OPP and illegal searches

Paul Smith is an alleged 30 year retired Ontario Provincial Police officer from the Meaford area. For a person serving 30 years for the OPP, you would think he would know ALL the laws concerning the Medical Marihuana Access Program from 2013, as well as a person’s Constitutional Rights, Privacy Rights,the criminal code and what constitutes an illegal search by someone such as Paul Smith.
oppPaul Smith worked for 30 years as an OPP cop and nothing on the internet about any of his OPP life before working for his licensed paralegal girlfriend Catherine April Stewart, the owner of Landlord Legal property management in Barrie,Ontario.

Paul Smith is an alleged 30 year retired Ontario Provincial Police officer from the Meaford area. For a person serving 30 years for the OPP, you would think he would know ALL the laws concerning the Medical Marihuana Access Program from 2013, as well as a person’s Constitutional Rights, Privacy Rights,the criminal code and what constitutes an illegal search by someone such as Paul Smith.

Retired OPP officer Smith allegedly misuses his past OPP status,and Private Investigator status when he worked as a process server for over 10 years for his paralegal girlfriend Catherine April Stewart, also of the Meaford area.Stewart who had recently closed her Meaford office, June 2014 after one year and now works out of a small cubicle office in Barrie, Ontario and her Walter’s Falls home.

Paul Smith has done pretty much whatever Catherine Stewart needed done, such as moving her office, process server, 24 Hour Intent to enters with complete unit photos, signing for legal documents, given any statements or affidavits needed and then signed by her with her commissioner stamp, under her legal status as a paralegal, any construction and fixing, has been known to attend and assist in seminars taught by his girlfriend, attend and testify in court for her firm or her clients purposes.

Catherine April Stewart is also known to be a licensed paralegal who is a LANDLORD ONLY ! rights advocate.

April Stewart is also known to own and operacropped-cbk.jpgte a Landlord only small property management company from 117 Bayfield Street, Barrie,Ontario,cubicle located in the section connecting the two buildings.

A lot of questions has come up as to how the Law Society of Upper Canada can let a paralegal own and operate as both a paralegal and a property manager. The Law Society is suppose to protect the public from paralegals and lawyers who break the law or rules and knowingly abuse the system.

Landlord Legal owner Catherine April StewartWorking as a  paralegal, her clients rights come first and the tenant or opposing party has no rights whatsoever! No privacy policy for tenant information she receives from her management company. Can find out a lot about the tenant and use it against them. Can initiate unit searches conducted by her boyfriend, and alleged ex OPP officer and use RTA s20 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE as the reason, as she teaches in her seminars that are discussed in upcoming posts. There is NO part of the RTA act that gives one party an advantage over another but Stewart has been known several times over the past to use the RTA s20 rule to do her dirty search work disguised as a property manager, and have Paul Smith attend court with his unrelated maintenance photos he had taken for her or her clients benefit. Again NO RIGHTS for the tenant for the illegal searches they perform for their Landlord clients benefit.

A publicly known LANDLORD RIGHTS advocate WHO VIOLATES other PEOPLES RIGHTS and breaks any law or rules to do whatever it takes for her clients to win.She gets away with this because of her switching from property manager to paralegal whenever dealing with the Law Society, Landlord and Tenant Board and or any court she attends.

Working as a property management company, the owner must follow the rules of the Business Act, Residential and Tenancies Act, 2006 as well as the Human Rights Code, PIPEDA and the Criminal Code.

Paul Smith as a retired OPP officer should know all of the regulations you would think. Read the Human Rights allegations against Paul smith and his girlfriend Catherine Stewart Here.

Cody Robertson-central lock and keyLandlord Legal as a property manager ordered Central Lock and Key to enter the Dykstra Bros Electric owned unit illegally as the Barrie Police told her she was not legal and then watched and did nothing when she has the locksmiths cut security chain and pick the door lock and enter  Read the illegal break in details here and the Barrie Police harassment concerns here.

How does a paralegal and ex OPP cop get away with these actions for so long?

How does the Law Society of Upper Canada let paralegals get away with abusing the system when they operate under the radar and switch roles and rules that govern each business?

The Law Society refused to investigate the legitimate complaint filed against Landlord legal in September 2013 when Catherine Stewart filed a vexatious lawsuit against the tenant that filed the Human Rights allegations against Catherine Stewart and her boyfriend, Paul T Smith.

Catherine Stewart also filed a vexatious lawsuit against Privacy Violators owner on October 2013 to delay the LSUC complaints filed from Catherine April Stewart not showing in the LTB allegations and the break and enter she committed in front of the Barrie police on August 15th 2013 for her Dykstra Bros Electric clients, Ralph Dykstra, William Dykstra and Donald Dykstra who also have Human Rights allegations filed against them.Read the Dykstra Bros Electric Human Rights allegations filed in 2013 from their ex tenant HERE.

There will be many follow up posts with Freedom of Information documents released as well as ALL the transcripts from the vexatious lawsuits Stewart filed on October 22nd 2013. Stewart’s personal claim has been delayed, and ignored and is still pending in Small Claims Court after the tenant asked for his right to a speedy trial be exercised in March of 2014.

Our court system is a joke and future posts will point out methods used to delay, interfere and blog down our already messed up legal system.

This paralegal and the complaints filed in 2013 will be heard when the Human rights allegations are dealt with. the public needs to be aware of the actions this paralegal is capable of.

The many Paul Smith and Catherine Stewart owner of Landlord Legal, harassment allegations, and the public threat to have the ex tenant arrested for criminal charges is discussed at length in upcoming posts.

Landlord Legal owner, threatens Human Rights Applicant with “Criminal Charges” on paralegals website !

Catherine-StewartA licensed member of the Law Society of Canada, Catherine April Stewart LSUC #P00985, owner of Landlord legal inc has openly threatened to have criminal charges brought against a party that has filed Human Rights allegations against her paralegal firm, LANDLORD LEGAL inc and her Dykstra Bros Electric, Ralph, Donald and William Dykstra clients.

The person referred to has been in, or is still pending with legal matters in Landlord & Tenant Board, Superior Court Canada for civil, Human Rights, and pending Supreme Court of Canada proceedings with parties mentioned throughout the posts on Privacy-Violators.com blog. Bookmark us and share our articles.

Law Society Upper Canada
Rule 2
Professionalism
2.01 INTEGRITY AND CIVILITY
Integrity
2.01 (1) A paralegal has a duty to provide legal services and discharge all responsibilities to clients, tribunals, the public and other members of the legal professions honourably and with integrity.
(2) A paralegal has a duty to uphold the standards and reputation of the
paralegal profession and to assist in the advancement of its goals, organizations and institutions.
Civility
(3) A paralegal shall be courteous and civil, and shall act in good faith with all persons with whom he or she has dealings in the course of his or her practice.
2.02 UNDERTAKINGS & TRUST CONDITIONS
2.02 (1)A paralegal shall fulfill every undertaking given and shall not give an undertaking that cannot be fulfilled.

(2) Except in exceptional circumstances, a paralegal shall give his or her undertaking in writing or confirm it in writing as soon as practicable after giving it.

(3) Unless clearly stated in the undertaking, a paralegal’s undertaking is a personal promise and it is his or her personal responsibility.

(4) A paralegal shall honor every trust condition once accepted.

RULE 4: Advocacy
duty to clients, tribunals and others, disclosure of documents, interviewing witnesses, communication with witnesses giving testimony, the paralegal as witness and dealing with unrepresented persons

Outside Interests and Public Office
(4) A paralegal who engages in another profession, business, occupation or other outside interest or who holds public office concurrently with the provision of legal services, shall not allow the outside interest or public office to jeopardize the paralegal’s integrity, independence, or competence.
(5) A paralegal shall not allow involvement in an outside interest or public office to impair the exercise of his or her independent judgment on behalf of a client.

TRUST CONDITIONS
2.02
(1) A paralegal shall fulfill every undertaking given and shall not give an undertaking that cannot be fulfilled.
(2) Except in exceptional circumstances, a paralegal shall give his or her undertaking in writing or confirm it in writing as soon as practicable after giving it.
(3) Unless clearly stated in the undertaking, a paralegal’s undertaking is a personal promise and it is his or her personal responsibility.
(4) A paralegal shall honor every trust condition once accepted.

RULE 7: Duty to Licensees and Others – duty to act with courtesy and good faith

RULE 8: Practice Management – general obligations, marketing, advertising and insurance

RULE 9: Responsibility to the Law Society – communications from the Law Society, duties to report, professional misconduct and conduct unbecoming a paralegal

The Law Society has never been notified by paralegal Catherine Stewart, owner of Landlord legal inc, that allegations of illegal entry and illegal lock change had been brought against this paralegal Aug 2013 in Barrie LTB court, by the HR applicant and NONE of the accused showed for the hearing in Sept 2013.

The Law Society has not been notified by Landlord Legal inc that there has been pending Human Rights allegations against her legal firm since May 2014, and is now including a pending amendment for allegations of personal Human Rights breaches.


The Human Rights (HR) Applicant has a pending claim and allegedly added Catherine April Stewart as a pending personal Respondent to the alleged HR discrimination allegations brought up by an ex tenant of Dykstra Bros Electric of Barrie, Ontario.

cropped-cbk.jpgLegal documents were delivered Aug 11 2015 to the Respondents address on file for pending Human Rights proceedings against her clients and her legal firm, located at 117 Bayfield Street Barrie, Ontario when Catherine April Stewart tried AGAIN, to have the Applicant charged, for trespassing, or whatever the police would be willing to charge him with from her allegations !!

The Barrie Police officer in question, harassed the ex tenant further, when he called the Human Rights applicants, personal cell number.

The officer demanded that the Human Rights Applicant come into the police station, again for questioning, the Applicant told him “NO FUCKING WAY” and told him to stop calling the cell number, stop harassing him and talk to Mr Graves, the person who delivered the legal documents if he had a problem.The phone number was changed because of the constant harassment and demands of the Barrie police from these harassing and vexatious complaints.

Another false allegation to the Barrie police involved Detective Cst Steele, in which he called the Human Rights Applicants cell phone as well and THREATENED to have a WARRANT ISSUED if he did not turn himself into Barrie Police.

The allegations of Howard Tavroges and Catherine Stewart stemming from the HR applicant ATTENDING a public and open forum Landlord and tenant Board courtroom, to obtain FURTHER PROOF of Howards Tavroges conflict of interest allegations, releasing private and privileged information allegations, to Landlord Legal inc, while he had signed working as a representative for Orillia Legal Clinic,in a paralegal capacity for the ex tenant.
Tavroges signed the joint agreement with Ms Stewart on July 18th 2013 for an LTB Order, which she made the tenant fight her firm in Superior Court to retrieve monies owed, while Mr Tavroges had been or was representing Landlord Legal inc, in LTB matters at the same time legal proceedings connected were pending in 2013 and 2014, and still pending in 2016.

” It was a hiccup of the law ” ~ Quote by Barrie police detective Steele, after calling his cell number given to him from Stewarts files, and threatening a warrant for the arrest of the Human rights Applicants, after receiving complaints and further vexatious and harassing allegations from C A Stewart & Howard Tavroges.

Detective Steeles as a police officer, C A Stewart and H Tavroges as licensed paralegals, should have known or aught to known, Human rights Codes, the Criminal Code of Canada as well as, RTA 2006,LSUC Rules of Conduct, Rules of Procedures for proceedings and all other RIGHTS of the HR Applicant.

Other alleged police contact, threats and harassment will be posted on PRIVACY VIOLATORS website, when ALL the requested freedom of Information documents, video recordings and incident reports are collected.

Stewart and Tavroges as paralegals should have known or aught to have known the LTB Tribunal was an open and public forum for EVERYBODY, and as such the Applicant can attend whenever he feels the need to watch justice in action or whatever other reason he chooses to do so.

C A Stewart should have known or aught to have known not to obstruct legal methods of delivering legal documents and would probably not be served as often, in front of her colleges and peers, at the Landlord and Tenant Board Tribunal courtroom, located on the 2nd floor of 34 Simcoe Street, Barrie Ontario, Canada.

The documents were hand delivered to the legal office of Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal inc, by a Mr B Graves, and not the involved party, though he had the right according to the Rules of Procedures to do so, when Stewart called the Barrie police again, this time, Cst Bareo (not sure of name spelling, but will be checking, when freedom of information and incident report requests are completed for ALL the incidents.)

Ralph Dykstra, William Dykstra and Donald Dykstra of Dykstra Bros Electric ltd / Paul T Smith / Catherine A Stewart / Landlord legal inc are ALL Respondents to the Human rights allegations, and have claimed to have hired Toronto based David Strashin, Sept 2015 to represent ALL parties, after paralegal Catherine A Stewart has represented involved parties since May 15th 2013, and alleged to have seriously delayed legal proceedings deliberately.

David Strashin has NOT FOLLOWED the Rules of Procedures for the HRTO 16250-13 (Dykstra Bros Electric) & HRTO 17699-14 (Landlord Legal inc / C A Stewart / Paul Smith). David Strashin is known to have other past business references, or relationships from 2011, with Landlord Legal as mentioned on the paralegals website on “In the News” category on, Hoarding Tenants.

The owner of Landlord legal inc, paralegal Catherine Stewart, has called the Barrie police on many unsubstantiated and false allegations against the HR Applicant since May 2013 when she was hired by Ralph Dykstra, Donald Dykstra and William Dykstra.

The property manager Catherine Stewart and her Dykstra Bros are alleged to have illegally entered/altered locks on Aug 15 2013.

Catherine Stewart, Ralph Dykstra, Donald Dykstra and William Dykstra DID NOT SHOW for the tenants rights application CET 33911-13 that accused them of the break in and lock change while the Barrie police watched.

Catherine Stewart calls the Barrie police on FALSE PRETENSES to “KEEP THE PEACE” knowing an LTB ORDER was in place, signed personally by Catherine Stewart ( SEE PARALEGAL RULES OF UNDERTAKINGS) and the tenant had legal possession of his rental unit !!. Officers M Beard and Cst Turner incident reports stating they told Stewart she DID NOT HAVE LEGAL DOCUMENTATION or the RIGHT TO ENTER but Catherine Stewart orders it done anyways !!

The paralegals alleged boyfriend Paul T Smith is also accused of Human rights violations against the past tenant caused when Paul Smith attended 40 Ellen Street, Barrie, Ontario in May 2013 to perform duties for Dykstra Bros, and Catherine Stewart.

Paralegals and Lawyers should not or should know NOT TO THREATEN or harass parties they are involved in proceedings against with CRIMINAL ARREST, FURTHER LEGAL THREATS or any kind of threat meant to harm the other party or to delay, coerce or influence the proceedings they are involved in.

Catherine-Stewart-pic1-150x120Landlord Legal inc owner has openly threatened an ex tenant with criminal charges on her Landlord legal website while Human Rights/Civil allegations pending ( http://landlordlegal.ca DEC 2015 to Jan 22nd 2016) of her paralegal firm, alleged boyfriend and Dykstra Bros electric owners allegedly have been defending alleged discrimination against the Human Rights of the tenant.

Images showing the serious threats to the ex tenant, Tenant Rights Applicant and the Human Rights Applicant made from the owner, Catherine April Stewart,for Landlord Legal inc publicly advertised paralegal services website threatening CRIMINAL CHARGES after numerous unsubstantiated and FALSE ALLEGATIONS made to the Barrie Police.
Read the posts surrounding the Barrie police confrontations and the paralegals attempts to have the Human Rights Applicant charged with anything !!:  http://privacy-violators.com/the-posts-watcher/barrie-police-continue-to-harass-ex-tenant-for-barrie-paralegal-catherine-april-stewart/

Barrie police refuse to charge the paralegal numerous times with the numerous unsubstantiated and false allegations she makes, of the ongoing harassment, allegations of false documents submitted for legal proceedings or for Applicant to press criminal harassment charges for the break in and illegal lock change witnessed by attending police officers and instructing paralegal that she had NO RIGHT or LEGAL DOCUMENT required to enter 40 Ellen Street, Barrie Ont on August 15th 2013. when Catherine Stewart and the Dykstras’ were present and proceeded to order the locksmith to cut security chain and enter unit illegally.

.

Catherine Stewart, owner of Landlord Legal filed civil matters Oct 2013 against the ex tenant, knowing of the pending HUMAN RIGHTS matters, amended the SCC 1851-13 application after a year to a personal claim, being told the matter was in the wrong court and needed to go to a higher court to deal with the publication of legal proceedings against her and her Dykstra Bros Electric company of Barrie clients.

The paralegal website also depicts or has publicized a photo of Nima Wilson, a black female tenant, that was evicted several times and the story of the tenants involvement with the process, further harassing and embarrassing the poor tenant for Landlord-Legal-website-page-and-info-1Landlord legal paralegal firms own eviction advertising purposes for LANDLORDS to “EVICT TROUBLED TENANTS”

Catherine Stewart’s personal SCC1851-13 allegations are still pending, and public record, as of Feb 2016 and after she filed original claim in Oct 2013 to delay the Law Society complaints and the Human Rights allegations against her alleged boyfriend, her firm and Dykstra Bros Electric of Barrie owners’.

The SCC1851-13 civil matter filed by C A Stewart is still pending, as Stewart has taken NO ACTION after being told it was IN THE WRONG court.

Catherine Stewart also claimed she had hired David Strashin to represent her for the higher court in July 2014 but again has not taken any action to further her claims.

The Applicant has claimed his Charter Rights, Fundamental Freedoms 2(b) and will continue to defend the public forums, open court and HR publicized findings in all proceedings he is involved in with Catherine Stewart, Paul T Smith,Ralph Dykstra,Donald Dykstra and William Dykstra.

The paralegal should have informed her clients the LTB, Civil and Human Rights are public forums and public documents to the proceedings and freedom of information requested are public documents as stated on the bottom of the LTB forms and additional forms filed for proceedings and can be used as such.

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to know not to create “CONFLICT of INTEREST” and if so, to remove themselves from ALL legal proceedings they are directly involved in.

Howard tavrogesHoward Tavroges is accused of releasing paralegal privileged information to owner Catherine Stewart after working for the Orillia Community Catherine-StewartLegal Clinic and representing the HR applicant during LTB matters for the July 18th 2013 Joint Submission agreement and further working for Landlord legal representing her firm in LTB matters while she fights the LTB ORDER signed by Catherine Stewart and Howard Tavroges.

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to know they are to advise clients and not act illegally for the clients they represent

 

CHARTER OF RIGHTS
Section 2(b)
Freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication

You have the right to think and believe what you want. You have the right to express those thoughts, without being afraid of being punished or silenced. The Supreme Court of Canada has said these freedoms are important for:

self-fulfillment
participation in social and political decision-making
the free exchange of ideas

Freedom of the press is essential in a democracy. Newspapers and other media are an important way for people to learn about what is going on and express their ideas.

Paralegals and what is known as “SHARP PRACTICE”

This post refers to the term “Sharp Practice” in relationship to the Law Society of Upper Canada (LSUC) Rules of Conduct, for paralegals and lawyers, refers to and occurs when the LSUC licensed parties use methods to abuse the process of legal proceedings that are not following the rules of the Law Society, not warranted, not standardized or legal, meant to hide their clients and disrupt or delay ANY legal proceedings or ANY COURT matters they are involved in !!.

Sharp practice is a pejorative phrase to describe sneaky or cunning behavior that is technically within the rules of the law but borders on being unethical

Gaming the system (also referred to as gaming the rules, bending the rules, abusing the system, cheating the system, milking the system, playing the system, or working the system) can be defined as using the rules and procedures meant to protect a system in order, instead, to manipulate the system for a desired outcome

Legal abuse refers to abuses associated with both civil and criminal legal action. Abuse can originate from nearly any part of the legal system, including frivolous and vexatious litigants, abuses by law enforcement, incompetent, careless or corrupt attorneys and misconduct from the judiciary itself.

Legal abuse is responsible not only for injustice, but also harm to physical, psychological and societal health

Vexatious litigation is legal action which is brought, regardless of its merits, solely to harass or subdue an adversary. It may take the form of a primary frivolous lawsuit or may be the repetitive, burdensome, and unwarranted filing of meritless motions in a matter which is otherwise a meritorious cause of action. Filing vexatious litigation is considered an abuse of the judicial process and may result in sanctions against the offender.

A single action, even a frivolous one, is usually not enough to raise a litigant to the level of being declared vexatious. Rather, a pattern of frivolous legal actions is typically required to rise to the level of vexatious. Repeated and severe instances by a single lawyer or firm can result in eventual disbarment.

SHARP PRACTICE is frowned upon by the Law Society of Upper Canada Rules of Conduct.Many Paralegals and Lawyers use Sharp Practice in their legal firms participation in the legal system further causing back logs of legal proceedings needlessly in defense of their firm or their clients.

Examples of Sharp Practice, is not showing, or notifying parties, using acting agents, locksmiths and other parties related to their cause, that have NO PHYSICAL BUSINESS ADDRESS anywhere, to deliver Court Summonses when they are, or clients are involved in legal proceedings.

Remember SHARP Practice = do whatever it takes, does not matter if they present at, or commit a criminal act, the LSUC rules, the Criminal Code, PIPEDA, Chart Rights, Human Rights or the Rules and procedures in any court proceeding you or your client are involved in.

Should you breach other peoples INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS if your a well known LANDLORD ONLY RIGHTS ACTIVIST  ?
Rights are for everybody…not just landlords !

How do you justify defending the rights of anyone… when you are alleged to have constantly violate the rights of others ??

Eviction Specialist, C A Stewart of Landlord legal inc refused to accept her alleged boyfriends Paul t Smith summons issued June 2013, delivered to her legal office at 117 Bayfield Street when Smith acted as an agent on Landlord legal inc behalf and her law firm was directly involved in the LTB Tribunal, and HR matters the tenant had filed.

Eviction Specialist, C A Stewart of Landlord legal inc, uses agents or sub contractors companies like Paul Richardsons’ Central Lock & Key, that has NO BRICK & MORTAR STORE, to enter tenants units, change locks and other duties she needs done. Central Lock & Key were hard to get a summons served to, as they are MOBILE UNIT ONLY and Mr Richardson son, Cody Richardson threatened the tenant. and tried to hit his vehicle with the Central lock & Key company van while attempting to serve them summonses for Superior Court Civil matters.

Paul Richardson saves a phone recording for 2 years from attempts to get him served for LTB matters in 2013, and lies about the date of the recording, and plays it on the witness stand to allegedly deceive the court, and help C A Stewarts Dykstra clients in court.

Using “acting agents” or “sub contractors” that are next to impossible to summons, or that paralegals can block access to, is a very common practice done among paralegals and lawyers who practice SHARP PRACTICE frowned by the LSUC.

Landlord Legal signs and enters testimony and allegations from Rob Scruton that have not been heard in any court, not even once into Dykstra civil matters.

Landlord Legal enters and serves documents, evidence and her signed statement of Scrutons testimony breaking rules of procedures and rules of a fair proceeding.

Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal, and her clients Ralph Dykstra, William Dykstra and Donald Dykstra of Dykstra Bros Electric, DO NOT SHOW AGAIN for the motions to dismiss the evidence and testimony Stewart entered against the rules of procedures for civil hearing SCC#1852-13.

Landlord Legal places Rob Srcuton on her witness list, though she serves against the rules by not giving “proper notice” or the required “will says” to interview the surprise witness from Innisfil, Ontario, Canada. Stewart does this surprise tactic less than 2 weeks before a hearing date. All evidence and will says were court ordered to be delivered to all parties prior to the Landlord Legal inc tactic used.

Catherine Stewart should have known or aught to have known the rules of procedures for small claims court.

Catherine Stewart of landlord legal should have known or aught to have known it was wrong to sign affidavits for her witness, Rob Scruton, when Stewart is directly involved in the Civil proceedings and Human Rights allegations against her firm. False testimony and conflict of interest concerns and allegations just to influence a proceeding Landlord legal and her Dykstra clients are directly involved in.

Catherine Stewart of Landlord legal should have known or aught to have known the testimony she signed for Rob Scruton had never seen one day in court, but enters his testimony she signed anyways to a legal proceeding she was involved in directly.

Paul T Smith, retired OPP officer of 30 years is another witness NOT ON THE WITNESS LIST EITHER, Catherine Stewart of landlord legal inc has not provided proper notice or the will says, for her alleged boyfriend. Paul T Smith ends up on the stand in civil court Dec 2015, for C A Sewarts Dykstra clients, although he is connected to breaching Human Rights while acting as an agent for Landlord legal and Dykstra Bros Electric,  and had absolutely no knowledge of the allegations in her Dykstra clients proceedings.

Landlord Legal should have known it was wrong to keep using alleged boyfriend Paul Smith, to serve the documents against the rules of procedures, when her alleged boyfriend and Stewart have pending Human rights allegations against them since May 2014.

After not showing for the motions to dismiss the evidence, Stewart has the motions heard the same day and in front of the same Judge hearing the Dykstra hearing.

Stewart also files another motion to split ( after motioning to join ) her personal SCC#1851-13 civil matter filed the same day as Dykstras claim, which Stewart was  told by the Judge in March 2014, was filed in the wrong court to deal with her demands to have this website shut down.Filed Oct 2013 and still in the wrong court in February 0f 2016…can you say harassment and vexatious

Landlord Legal motions to bring her personal civil matter to be heard with her clients in 2014, HR applicant demanding rights to a speedy trial hearing

Paralegals and Lawyers have an obligation to Minimize costs during ALL legal proceedings against ANY party.

Paralegals and Lawyers have the obligation to HONOR UNDERTAKINGS they have agreed to and have signed on behalf of their clients.

Paralegals and Lawyers have the obligation to protect confidential and privileged information and documents they have obtained.

Paralegals and lawyers have the obligation to follow ALL THE RULES OF CONDUCT of the Law Society of Upper Canada.

Paralegals and Lawyers have the obligation to follow THE RULES OF PROCEDURES in all legal proceedings.

Licensed Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to have known all the Rules and Regulations of the ;

  1. Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO)
  2. Criminal Code of Canada
  3. Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (CDSA)
  4. Personal Information and Electronic Document Act (PIPEDA)
  5. Residential Tenancies Act 2006 (RTA)
  6. Rules of Procedure in ALL COURTS representing any party
  7. Rules of Conduct (LSUC)
  8. Should be Knowledgeable in the area they practice

Paralegals and Lawyers should not or should know NOT TO THREATEN or harass parties they are involved in proceedings against with CRIMINAL ARREST, FURTHER LEGAL THREATS, NO TRESPASS OR NO CONTACT LETTERS or any kind of threat meant to harm the other party or to delay, coerce or influence the proceedings they are involved in.

Catherine-StewartLandlord Legal inc owner has openly threatened an ex tenant with criminal charges on her Landlord legal website while Human Rights/Civil allegations pending ( http://landlordlegal.ca DEC 2015 to Jan 22nd 2016) of her paralegal firm, alleged boyfriend and Dykstra Bros electric owners allegedly have been defending alleged discrimination against the Human Rights of the tenant.

Images showing the serious threats to the ex tenant, Tenant Rights Applicant and the Human Rights Applicant made from the owner, Catherine April Stewart,for Landlord Legal inc publicly advertised paralegal services website threatening CRIMINAL CHARGES after numerous unsubstantiated and FALSE ALLEGATIONS made to the Barrie Police.
Read the posts surrounding the Barrie police confrontations and the paralegals attempts to have the Human Rights Applicant charged with anything !!:  http://privacy-violators.com/the-posts-watcher/do-barrie-police-continue-to-harass-ex-tenant-for-barrie-paralegal-catherine-april-stewart/Barrie police logo

Barrie police refuse to charge the paralegal numerous times with the numerous unsubstantiated and false allegations she makes, of the ongoing harassment, allegations of false documents submitted for legal proceedings or for Applicant to press criminal harassment charges for the break in and illegal lock change witnessed by attending police officers and instructing paralegal that she had NO RIGHT or LEGAL DOCUMENT required to enter 40 Ellen Street, Barrie Ont on August 15th 2013. when Catherine Stewart and the Dykstras’ were present and proceeded to order the locksmith to cut security chain and enter unit illegally.

 

Landlord Legal website.

Catherine Stewart, owner of Landlord Legal filed civil matters Oct 2013 against the ex tenant, knowing of the pending HUMAN RIGHTS matters, amended the SCC 1851-13 application after a year to a personal claim, being told the matter was in the wrong court and needed to go to a higher court to deal with the publication of legal proceedings against her and her Dykstra Bros Electric company of Barrie clients.

Catherine Stewart has locksmiths attend to remove locks after 2 Barrie police officers tell Landlord Legal, that it is  “not legal” and “no proper documentation” to do so, but DOES ANYWAYS  illegally but states on her website the proper way to get to the SHERIFFS’ office and get the proper paperwork… We figured it is a case of “do as I say and not as I do , or teach”. 

Catherine A Stewart of Landlord legal also gives lectures that instructs and teaches landlords not to put tenants on the defensive as well, and to “GO LOOK IN THE WINDOWS WHEN TENANT NOT HOME. wow, can anyone say Trespassing,not to mention teaching  landlords, real estate persons, agents and other attendees a serious tenant invasion of privacy.

Catherine Stewarts personal SCC1851-13 allegations are still pending, and are public record, as of Feb 2016 and after filing original claim in Oct 2013, to delay the Law Society complaints, and Human Rights allegations against her company, her alleged boyfriend, and Dykstra Bros Electric owners’.

The SCC1851-13 civil matter filed by C A Stewart is still pending, as Stewart has taken NO ACTION after being told it was IN THE WRONG court.

Catherine Stewart also claimed she had hired David Strashin to represent her for the higher court in July 2014 but again has not taken any action to further her claims.

The Applicant has claimed his Charter Rights, Fundamental Freedoms 2(b) and will continue to defend the public forums, open court and HR publicized findings in all proceedings he is involved in with Catherine Stewart, Paul T Smith,Ralph Dykstra,Donald Dykstra and William Dykstra.

The paralegal should have informed her clients the LTB, Civil and Human Rights are public forums and public documents to the proceedings and freedom of information requested are public documents as stated on the bottom of the LTB forms and additional forms filed for proceedings and can be used as such.

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to know not to create “CONFLICT of INTEREST” and if so, to remove themselves from ALL legal proceedings they are directly involved in.

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to know they are to advise clients and not act illegally for the clients they represent.

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to know they are to advise and regulate those clients on how to behave during proceedings with courtesy, civility, integrity and honor and not bring unrelated matters, disrupt proceedings with threats, unsubstantiated claims or any other method used to intimidate or influence a proceeding.

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to know they are not allowed to be present at or participate in illegal acts like break ins or illegal lock changes.

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to know it is wrong and against the rules of procedures to block all CONTACT when the legal representative has come on record and has the obligation to receive legal documents required for legal proceedings without justifiable reasons or a properly applied for peace bond, injunction or court order that states the reasons and the remedy.

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to know NOT TO FILE vexatious legal proceedings meant to delay proceedings and harm applicants financial situation causing further intentional harm.

Paralegals and lawyers should know or aught to know the rules and responsibility governing minimizing losses and the rules for UNDERTAKINGS.

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to know to “CONTACT” other parties involved if “NOT ATTENDING” within a reasonable amount of time, to not further costs from “witness fees”, waste the “courts time” and waste  “applicants time”

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to know the rules and, to be civil, courteous and respectful to everyone, and to respect ALL RIGHTS given to the Applicants or Respondents in any legal proceeding.

PIPEDA and your practice

Paralegals and Lawyers should have known or aught to have known to act with Civility,Integrity and Honesty at all times when dealing with another party or their representatives.

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to have known it was wrong and illegal to enter or misrepresent documents or information into legal proceedings when the document does NOT EXIST in any stated court files.

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to have known to keep confidential documents, court evidence and other privileged legal information secured and away from other tenants they rent to in the same building as their LEGAL OFFICES.

Meaford office closed June 2015

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to know to CONTACT legal proceedings and ALL PARTIES, they have come ON RECORD for the proceedings with phone,fax, and contact information and to NOTIFY ALL PROCEEDINGS of ANY CHANGES to office closures and changes to the information they had provided to the courts and the opposing parties.

Landlord Legal cubicle officeCatherine Stewart of Landlord Legal rents 2 buildings to an account company firm, who has received many confidential legal documents unsecured several times on behalf of Catherine Stewart of Landlord legal inc, from hand deliveries and process severs.

Paralegals and Lawyers who switch offices, and block communication from parties involved in legal proceedings are in fact breaking the rules of procedures, hiding their clients and preventing the ease of communication meant to make legal proceedings transparent, easier and straight forward is one form of known  “HARD PRACTICE”.

There are a lot of paralegals that do “SHARP PRACTICE” to make sure their clients have an edge over the Applicants to further financial stress, hinder, delay and frustrate the involved parties and interfere with the legal processes.

Read the stories surrounding Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal and her clients, Ralph Dykstra, Landlord Legal owner Catherine April StewartWilliam Dykstra, Donald Dykstra, owners of Dykstra Bros Electric of Barrie as well as the allegations against Landlord legal and Catherine Stewart, use your judgement and see if you feel that Landlord legal inc uses the frowned upon Hard Practices in her legal firm.

Let Privacy Violators know of ANY paralegal or Lawyer that you have been involved with uses methods listed here on our website to gain advantages over the other party they are involved with in legal proceedings.

The Human Rights allegations against Ralph Dykstra, William Dykstra and Donald Dykstra of Dykstra Bros Electric company of Barrie, Ontario started in 2013 and proceedings continue at the HRTO as of January 20th 2016 when David Strashin, apparently came on record but has not notified the HRTO or involved parties of this fact and according to the HRTO Rules of Procedures during proceedings.

The Human Rights allegations against Paul Smith, Catherine Stewart and Landlord Legal  paralegal firm of Barrie, Ontario started in 2013 and proceedings continue at the HRTO as of January 20th 2016, when David Strashin, apparently came on record to represent the LTB paralegal who has represented, and delayed the Dykstra Bros allegations, for the last 3 years, in HRTO, but has not notified the HRTO or involved parties of this fact according to the HRTO Rules of Procedures.

With the HR Applicant filing many LSUC allegations, complaints, and concerns starting back from May 24th 2013, with many more complaints to file up to February 2016, Landlord legal has not even been investigated once in the last 3 years by the Law Society of Upper Canada, or the Barrie police from the many complaints filed by the applicant while waiting for the pending HR matter to finish.
Stewart had in Oct 2013 blocked the Law Society complaints by filing and stalling vexatious claims to delay the complaints and the human Rights allegations filed against her legal firm, boyfriend and her Dykstra clients.

3 years and STILL working as a paralegal in our legal system, with many pending unanswered allegations, including illegal entry, illegal lock change, abuse of process allegations, Rules of procedures breaches,entering false documents into legal proceedings allegations, harassment allegations, threatening, coercing and the Human Rights allegations against her legal firm, boyfriend and her Dykstra Bros Electric clients, but still in the legal system.

The HR applicant has requested a time extension from the Law Society of Upper Canada, to file the many allegations and concerns regarding Landlord legal inc, Howard Tavroges and new claims against David Strashin of Toronto. Read the posts on the Law Society of Upper Canada refusing to investigate complaints filed June 2013 against Landlord legal inc

The Law Society of Upper Canada complaints filed against Howard Tavroges, and Catherine Stewart of Landlord legal inc of 117 Bayfield Street, Barrie have been delayed when Stewart claims over legal proceedings are ongoing and the LSUC delayed investigating the May 2013 claims brought forth by the ex tenant over privacy invasion and illegal break in and illegal lock change after a mediated settlement July 18 2013 in LTB Tribunal matters.

Additional methods known to be Sharp Practice will be added to the above compilation as time and need to educate warrant it.

Report Sharp practice and additional  methods used here and we can discuss the rise in court proceedings caused by the needless delays of the paralegal or Lawyers involved.

CHARTER OF RIGHTS
Section 2(b)
Freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication

You have the right to think and believe what you want. You have the right to express those thoughts, without being afraid of being punished or silenced. The Supreme Court of Canada has said these freedoms are important for:

self-fulfillment
participation in social and political decision-making
the free exchange of ideas

Freedom of the press is essential in a democracy. Newspapers and other media are an important way for people to learn about what is going on and express their ideas.

Section 15.

Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

Landlord Legal – Catherine Stewart VS Privacy-Violators

Barrie Superior Court of Justice – #1851-13
PENDING COURT ACTIONS – will update when available information is processed

 Catherine Stewart (link to ULSC  website -go to directory) a P1 type paralegal and self proclaimed “The Terminator” on her older website is the owner of Landlord legal, Meaford, Ontario has sent cease and desist letters to Privacy Violators blog to shut down its help site. Landlord legal has gone so far as to harass and interfere with our rights to publish our material that they have also sent cease and desist letters to Pier 1 in Toronto,Ontario in attempts to have us shut down.

 

cropped-gavel2-150x150We responded to the complaint with emails to both Pier 1 and Landlord Legal saying the site was never a LIVE website at that time and was always in development and in “Maintenance Mode” while the website was being developed. The lead in stories on the maintenance page resulted in legal action being sought from both Landlord legal and Privacy Violators.com on these matters and we will keep you up to date as usual with all the information,court documents and photos related to these court cases.

 Read the interesting posts on how the Upper Law Society of Canada handles complaints from the public sector against paralegals.


Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia defines Landlord Harassment as :

“Landlord harassment is the willing creation, by a landlord or his agents, of conditions that are uncomfortable for one or more tenants in order to induce willing abandonment of a rental contract. Such a strategy is often sought because it avoids costly legal expenses and potential problems with eviction. This kind of activity is common in regions where rent control laws exist, but which do not allow the direct extension of rent-controlled prices from one tenancy to the subsequent tenancy, thus allowing landlords to set higher prices. Landlord harassment carries specific legal penalties in some jurisdictions, but enforcement can be very difficult or even impossible in many circumstances. However, when a crime is committed in the process and motives similar to those described above are subsequently proven in court, then those motives may be considered an aggravating factor in many jurisdictions, thus subjecting the offender(s) to a stiffer sentence.” ~ Wikipedia

 

THE POST WATCHER
[fpg cat=”9″]

 

Follow us on
 

Catherine Stewart has been representing Dykstra Bros Electric since May 2013 on numerous matters. The Upper Law Society complaints previously filed or are in the process of filing have yet to be dealt with. The results will be posted when received. Read some of the other past issues.

 

Landlords “Intent to Enter” & Your Privacy

What privacy rights do you have when a paralegal or landlord serves you with an “intent to enter” order” ?

The truth is you have NO RIGHTS at all.

This is the first hand story of a paralegal doing what her clients wants – GET THE TENANT OUT !. Read what Catherine Stewart and her acting agent do after posting of this notice on the tenants door.

Read the post and learn what they are capable of doing without any consequences for their actions. This might shock some of the readers.

On May 24th, 2013 Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal  then at a location at 117 Bayfield Street, Barrie, Ontario had an agent acting on their behalf do their “intent to enter”

  • Taped an “intent to enter notice” openly ( no envelope) on prominent door
  • Tenant responded within 1 hr back in writing of birthday party on that day
  • Landlord Legal ignores tenant request for another day
  • Landlord Legal interrupts birthday party – some guests left
  • Landlords Legal agent photographs every inch of every room
  • Agent photographs sensitive office notes,licence &  more off office walls
  • Agent photographs other MMAR Participants licence off desk arealandlord-legal-card
  • Landlord Legal aware tenant is Legal MMAR Participant
  • Landlord Legals agent photographs Legal grow rooms (2 small rooms)
  • Landlord Legal takes photographs to Barrie police with false claims
  • Landlord Legal files “Notice of early termination” to tenant
  • Landlord Legal mediates in BAD faith to get tenant out. Read More

Many complaints and additional court cases were spawned from the bad mediation from the Dykstras and Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal.Follow the posts related to this in the Dykstra/Stewart – All Related Posts category.

intent-to-enteWikipedia, the free encyclopedia defines Landlord Harassment as :“Landlord harassment is the willing creation, by a landlord or his agents, of conditions that are uncomfortable for one or more tenants in order to induce willing abandonment of a rental contract. Such a strategy is often sought because it avoids costly legal expenses and potential problems with eviction. This kind of activity is common in regions where rent control laws exist, but which do not allow the direct extension of rent-controlled prices from one tenancy to the subsequent tenancy, thus allowing landlords to set higher prices. Landlord harassment carries specific legal penalties in some jurisdictions, but enforcement can be very difficult or even impossible in many circumstances. However, when a crime is committed in the process and motives similar to those described above are subsequently proven in court, then those motives may be considered an aggravating factor in many jurisdictions, thus subjecting the offender(s) to a stiffer sentence.” ~ Wikipedia

Landlord Legal fails to notify defendant again !

Superior Court of Justice – #1851-13
LANDLORD LEGAL inc, 44 Sykes Street North, Meaford Ontario VS PRIVACY-VIOLATORS blog 

Catherine-StewartA civil lawsuit #1851-13 that was filed in Superior Court of Justice, Barrie, Ontario by Landlord Legal Inc, Catherine April Stewart against this website Privacy-Violators.com had its first appearance for a “Settlement Conference” today Friday, March 7th 2014 @ 9:30am.

Although Catherine Stewart of Landlord legal Inc. is the “Plaintiff” in this case, she failed to show at the settlement conference this morning in front of Deputy Judge Stabile, to represent her claims against Privacy Violators website, instead sending another paralegal T Benny to represent her, claiming her client is out of the country and she is unable to attend the hearing and had alleged she sent a letter to the defendant February 20th 2014 stating so for this hearing date for the civil suit filed against her clients and scheduled for next Friday, March 14th 2014 at this same courthouse.

Defendant requested “Costs” from Landlord Legal inc,  Catherine Stewart for failing to notify him of her and her clients failure to show and was given costs of $50.00 from Landlord Legal inc and $50.00 from Dykstra Bros Electric  regardless of the outcome of the case.

The letter Landlord Legal refers to was sent to the Orillia Community Clinic paralegal James R for a civil matter #1546-13 against Bill Dykstra who is representing Dykstra Bros Electric on a “Notice of Examination” hearing that was scheduled to be heard next Friday March 14 2014 at the Superior Court of Justice, Barrie, Ontario  from a civil suit filed by the ex tenant for money owing from the BAD MEDIATION and who has also filed a Human Rights case against Ralph Dykstra, Bill Dykstra and Don Dykstra of Dykstra Bros Electric of Barrie, Ontario.

This is not the first time that Catherine Stewart, of Landlord legal inc. has failed to notify the opposite parties of cases she was involved with that she or her clients were not able to attend a scheduled hearing with the means & sufficient time to notify the other party.

In this ex tenants Landlord and Tenant Tribunal case # CET-33911-13, the tenant had summoned police Cst M Beard, Central Lock and Key Barrie,Ontario owner and his employee Cody along with Nik S for the LTB September 24th, 2014 hearing date. Stewart had also claimed she was out of the country and was unable to attend the hearing but neglected to contact the ex tenant, the Barrie LTB tribunal, or any of the witness’s that were present that day set for the hearing.Much consideration is being put on re submitting these complaints to be heard.

The judge hearing the case said Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal needed to provide proof of her “out of the country” claim upon returning for the next scheduled court date for the matter.

The ex tenant withdrew the  CET-33911-13 LTB matter, for the alleged illegal entry & illegal lock change complaint that was done by Central Lock and Key of Barrie and was ordered by Landlord Legal,Catherine Stewart & Dykstra Bros Electric, with a year to bring this matter back up in LTB court, to take his case to be heard at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

It has been clear that dealing with Landlord Legal inc., Catherine April Stewart does not follow all the rules and regulations that are set out in the “Rules and Regulations for Paralegals” which will be posted here soon for any interested parties to read.

As a P1 Private Paralegal representing LANDLORDS ONLY, Stewart sent an email to this ex tenant stating she does not have the same privacy,courtesy or rules for him when the tenant repeatedly asked in writing for the “Intent to Enter” inspection report or the photos taken May 24th 2014 by Catherine Stewarts agent “Paul Smith”.

Catherine Stewart had also sent several threatening correspondences to the Orillia Community Clinic with her opinion that the ex tenant should not be represented by them for the civil suit filed against Dykstra Bros Electric for the “BAD FAITH MEDIATION” that arose from the July 18th 2014 CET 31816-13 & CEL 32321-13 LTB Tribunal mediation that Landlord Legal inc., Catherine Stewart had orchestrated to have the tenant leave the rental unit at 40 Ellen Street, Barrie Ontario that was owned by her clients, Ralph Dykstra, Bill Dykstra and Don Dykstra.

Read the related post here “Landlord Legal/Dykstra Bros Electric Mediate in BAD Faith

Read another related post here “Dykstra Bros Electric fails to notify defendant again !

You can read the post – What Private Practice Paralegals can get away with when completed and posted.

Dykstra Bros Electric fails to notify defendant again !

Superior Court of Justice – #1852-13
DYKSTRA BROS ELECTRIC:Ralph Dykstra,Don Dykstra,Bill Dykstra,Barrie, Ontario VS PRIVACY-VIOLATORS blog

Don Dykstra
Don Dykstra
William Dykstra of Dykstra Bros Electric
William Dykstra
Ralph Dykstra of Dykstra Bros Electric
Ralph Dykstra
Dykstras commercial plaza Ellen 38 St Barrie
38 Ellen Street, Barrie-Dykstra’s office

A civil lawsuit #1852-13 that was filed in Superior Court of Justice, Barrie, Ontario by Dykstra Bros Electric, Don Dykstra, Bill Dykstra and Ralph Dykstra and represented by Landlord Legal Inc, Catherine April Stewart against Privacy-Violators blog for its postings on the past court hearings and alleged damage to the rental unit owned by Ralph Dykstra,Bill Dykstra & Don Dykstra, had its first appearance for a “Settlement Conference” today Friday, March 7th 2014 @ 9:30am.

Although Dykstra Bros Electric is the “Plaintiff” in this case, they and their private paralegal representative April C Stewart of Landlord Legal inc. failed to show at the settlement conference this morning in front of Deputy Judge Stabile to represent any of the claims they have brought up against Privacy Violators blog.

Landlord Legal inc. instead chose to send another paralegal T Benny to represent her, claiming her client is out of the country and she is unable to attend the hearing and had alleged she sent a letter to the defendant February 20th 2014 stating so for this hearing date for the civil suit filed against her clients and scheduled for next Friday, March 14th 2014 at this same courthouse.

The March 14th court date is for a “Notice of Examination” for which Bill Dykstra was scheduled to explain why several past court orders to pay the funds they owe from a mediated deal they had made with the tenant in an LTB Tribunal hearing in Barrie,Ontario on July 18th 2013 in which they failed to follow through.

Catherine Stewart had also sent several threatening correspondences to the Orillia Community Clinic with her opinion that the ex tenant should not be represented by them for the civil suit filed against Dykstra Bros Electric for the “BAD FAITH MEDIATION” that arose from the July 18th 2014 CET 31816-13 & CEL 32321-13 LTB Tribunal mediation that Landlord Legal inc., Catherine Stewart had orchestrated to have the tenant leave the rental unit at 40 Ellen Street, Barrie Ontario that was owned by her clients, Ralph Dykstra, Bill Dykstra and Don Dykstra.Simply put, these  people have NO HONOR or COMPASSION whatsoever.

Read related “BAD MEDIATION” post here “Landlord Legal/Dykstra Bros Electric Mediate in BAD Faith

Read another related post here : “Landlord Legal fails to notify defendant again !” 

Defendant requested “Costs” from Dykstra Bros Electric & Landlord Legal inc,  Catherine Stewart for failing to notify him of her and her clients failure to show and was given costs of $50.00 from Landlord Legal inc and $50.00 from Dykstra Bros Electric  regardless of the outcome of the case.

The ex tenant withdrew the  CET-33911-13 LTB matter, for the alleged illegal entry & illegal lock change complaint that was done by Central Lock and Key of Barrie and was ordered by Landlord Legal,Catherine Stewart & Dykstra Bros Electric, with a year to bring this matter back up in LTB court, to take his case to be heard at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

Upper Law Society of Canada refused to investigate legitimate tenant complaints

THE DIRECTOR OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF UPPER CANADA REFUSED TO INVESTIGATE LEGITIMATE COMPLAINTS !!

Catherine-StewartPrivacy-Violators blog has learned that complaints that had been previously filed with the Law Society of Upper Canada, against the owner of Landlord Legal inc, Catherine April Stewart, a P1 private paralegal, operating from offices in Meaford & Barrie Ontario, had continued to be ignored and not investigated though strenuously argued, with many documents submitted to support the complaints.

This is not the first time complaints against Catherine Stewart have been filed with the Upper Law Society of Canada by this ex tenant and they have not been investigated or documented at all. Nowhere can you find out information on HOW MANY TIMES they have investigated or have neglected to investigate legitimate complaints that have been filed against ANY lawyer or paralegal on their website.

** Previous complaint against Diane Smith, of Smith paralegal Services were investigated with the ULSC hearing finding Smith guilty.

When complaints were filed by a Barrie ex tenant last year, against Landlord Legal, Catherine Stewart, the owner had contacted the Law Society intake officer handling the complaint, David Cass, several times on the filed complaints, saying the matter is still in Landlord & Tenant tribunal or had been taken up with the Privacy Commissioner of Canada and had already been dealt with.

ULSC intake officer David Cass dismissed the complaints the tenant had filed without investigating the facts. Another complaint was re filed and asked to be further investigated.

Though Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal had contacted David Cass several times, the Law Society’s intake officer NEVER contacted the ex tenant on the matter except to send a letter dismissing the complaints.

Read ALL the letters and emails received from the Law Society of Canada’s intake officer David Cass to the ex tenant and the tenants responses back to the Law Society on the complaints he had filed against this paralegal last year. Several other tenants have contacted the Privacy-Violators.com website to share similar complaints they have filed with the Law Society against this same paralegal but also not investigated.

The NEWEST COMPLAINTS that have been filed come from an August 15th 2013 incident where Landlord Legal or an agent acting on her behalf, allegedly had called the Barrie Police on a false report to “keep the peace” at 40 Ellen Street, Barrie, Ontario. Read the attending Barrie Police Officers notes obtained from a Freedom of Information request from the ex tenant on the incident report.

The tenant claims Landlord Legal,Catherine Stewart had also called Central Key and Lock from Barrie Ontario, a mobile Cody Robertson-central lock and keylocksmith to enter the unit at 40 Ellen Street, Barrie, Ontario and change the locks without any 24 hour intent to enter, eviction notice, sheriffs order or any other legal right to do so.

** Hence the reason complaints were filed with the Law Society of Upper Canada against Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal inc.

The rental property at 40 Ellen Street, is owned by Ralph Dykstra, Bill Dykstra and Don Dykstra, operating as Dykstra Bros Electric, to whom Stewart had been representing since May 13th 2013 and throughout all the Landlord & Tenant Board Tribunal hearings and the recent Small Claims proceedings Stewart SCC#1851-13 and Dykstras SCC#1852-13 have filed.

April Stewart attempted to withdraw her own civil case and Dykstras civil cases during Motions brought forth May 27th 2014 by the Barrie tenant to file a counter suit. A counter suit for $25,000 is being filed against April Stewart and her clients Dykstra Bros Electric.

The Settlement Conference is to be heard July 11th 2014 on the matter.

Their is no chance for a settlement on these issues and a hearing date will be asked for a judge to hear the matter.

We will continue to keep the updates coming as time prevails. There has been many details to add to our posts to bring everything up to date.

We have asked the complaints with the ULSC to go forward with new documentation being sent to further the investigations requested. Comments from the director about the requests will be published here. we look forward to following the ULSC and the hearings, which we will be present.

Human Rights allegations filed against Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal and Paul T Smith for discrimination against tenant Medical Marihuana grower

Catherine-StewartA Human Rights application was filed May 2014 by the ex tenant, against Catherine April Stewart of Landlord legal inc, acting agent and alleged boyfriend, 30 yr retired OPP Officer, process server and personal private investigator Paul Smith, for allegedly breaching  the Human Rights Code, discriminating against him when they illegally evicted the tenant for allegedly growing more plants than they figured he was entitled and licensed for.

Law Society complaints have been filed by the ex tenant against Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal and her associate Howard Tavroges for CONFLICT OF INTEREST, RELEASING PRIVATE CONFIDENTIAL information allegations when  Howard Tavroges represented the tenant in several LTB matters, including the mediated agreement she failed to honor July 18th 2013, and represents Landlord Legal in many LTB Tribunal matters on her companies behalf.

LTB matters that Howard Tavroges represented for Landlord legal inc from July 2013 to Jan 2016 were recorded to send to the LSUC showing Tavroges worked for, and released private information to Catherine Stewart while Stewart proceeded in Superior Court against the tenant.

Howard Tavroges in May,June,July of 2013 had been a LTB paralegal with the Orillia Community Legal Clinic and had talked with and represented the tenant in LTB proceedings, also signed the LTB Joint Submission Order, against Catherine Stewart of Landlord legal inc,Ralph Dykstra, William Dykstra and Donald Dykstra of Dykstra Bros Electric. The tenant had to take Catherine Stewart and her Dykstra Bros clients to civil court to retrieve the LTB Order that Catherine Stewart personally signed the UNDERTAKING for her Dykstra clients.

The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO) received an application that was filed back in December 2013 from an ex tenant against Ralph Dykstra, William Dykstra and Don Dykstra of Dykstra Bros Electric of Barrie, Ontario concerning alleged medical marihuana privacy violations and discriminating against the tenant when they insist he only grows four plants when licensed for many more than they want him to grow.

Human-Rights0004The Human Rights claim is for discriminating against him for not allowing him to grow more than four (4) plants when he was licensed for an excess of that amount and was growing within his given license requirements legally. It is also states claims of Medical Marihuana Access Program privacy violation issues plus threats of reprisal, acts of reprisal, harassment and the illegal reasons stated in the N5 that Stewart attempt to evict him on un Constitutional grounds.

The court hearings between the tenant and Dykstra Bros electric started back in May 2013 when the tenant had taken the landlords, Ralph Dykstra, William Dykstra and Don Dykstra to the Barrie Landlord and Tenant Board tribunal for discussing private, confidential Health Canada Medical Marihuana Access program information with their very long time family friend and tenant, Nancy Groves.

LTB Judge Sean Henry heard the case in and determined the landlords did discuss confidential information with tenant & their longtime friend Nancy Groves (aka Nancy Aikens) on or about March 27th 2013. Read further details from the May 7th hearing here: Barrie Dykstra Bros Electric vs Tenant Privacy

The LTB tribunal hearings did not end in May between the tenant and Dykstra Bros Electric with a simple apology.Nooooo !!

Ralph Dykstra, William Dykstra and Don Dykstra of Dykstra Bros Electric, hire Catherine April Stewart of Landlord Legal inc on May 13th to evict the tenant.

On May 23rd 2013, Catherine Stewart of Landlord legal or one of her agents posted a letter on behalf of her clients, the Dykstras, openly displaying private and confidential Medical Marihuana Access Program (MMAP) information concerning the tenant along with a “24 hour Intent to Enter” notice.The letter further demanded the tenant produce MMAP license information to her agent that was to perform the “Routine Maintenance” as she claimed in the 24 hour the intent to enter notice.

Paul Smith, alleged boyfriend and acting agent for Dykstra Bros entered 40 Ellen Street, Barrie for the notice, though a letter was given to Landlord Legal at their Barrie office located at, 117 Bayfield Street, the same morning as receiving her notice and revealing letter explaining a birthday party was already scheduled.

Read further details on the “Routine Maintenance” that turned into a full blown inspection with 100’s of photos being taken, many of personal and private documents, information belonging to the tenant. The inspection was done in spite of the tenants birthday party and in front of the tenants remaining guests from the scheduled birthday party. These actions led to a Privacy Commissioner of Canada complaint later handled by Cristine Derenzis from that office.Read the details of the entry and further allegations brought forth by the ex tenant of Dykstra Bros Electric company from Barrie Ontario.  : Landlords “Intent to Enter” & Your Privacy

The tenant filed another LTB hearing CET #31816-13 against Dykstras and their agent for harassment and disclosing the confidential MMAP information and had a June 27th hearing date set to hear the complaint.

Landlord Legal owner Catherine April StewartCatherine Stewart of Landlord Legal inc had sent a DO NOT CONTACT her or her clients or TRESPASS on the properties of Landlord Legal inc and her clients, the Dykstra brothers, to the Community Legal clinic in Orillia, Ontario

Stewart refused to provide copies to the tenant of the “Routine Maintenance”, inspection report or copies of the photos that her acting agent Paul smith had taken may 24th 2013 in written or email requests.

Catherine Stewart, sole owner of Landlord Legal inc refuses the LTB court summons,even from attending Barrie police officers, whom she had called on the tenant, on false pretenses, for her alleged boyfriend and agent,private investigator,process server and ex OPP officer Paul T Smith while attempting to serve the summons to Landlord Legal paralegal office on Bayfield Street, Barrie,Ontario.A follow up story to the Barrie police harassment allegations from the Dykstra Bros Electric ex tenant in relation to Smith sgt status before he retired from service and went to work as an acting agent for the paralegal firm landlord legal inc,Barrie,Meaford offices.

Catherine Stewart does not fill out the N5 properly identifying other hearings, past or present that were related to her application and before the Landlord & Tenant Board tribunal. The tenant had a previous hearing related to her N5 application, but not noted properly on the LTB forms. Landlord Legal owner Catherine Stewart was quoted as saying “I have 13 yrs experience, don’t tell me how to do my job” to Barrie police Aug 15th 2013.

Catherine Stewart files an N5 ” Notice of Early Termination” on grounds the tenant would not produce the Health Canada MMAP information she demanded in her letter and refused to give an un blocked copy to Paul Smith, who asked for the license information without any authority to do so and in front of the tenants guests. The tenant was posting all of his LTB hearing information following his adventures through Landlord and Tenant tribunal complaints against the paralegal and her clients and Stewart wanted the postings stopped and this website shut down.

The LTB matter is mediated by LTB mediator Dawn Lewis, Community Legal clinic paralegal Howard Tavroges ( NO LONGER WITH ORILLIA LEGAL CLINIC, though his current Upper Law Society of Canada profile still shows the Legal Clinic phone number and fax) theorig-mediation-agreement tenant and Catherine Stewart.

The mediated agreement order was to return last months rent and tenant would voluntarily move out on August 15th 2013 to file his Human Rights claim in peace and his living environment was already poisoned from the Dykstras revealing his confidential MMAP information.

** On move out day, August 15th 2013, Catherine Stewart of landlord Legal and her clients were present at the tenants 40 Ellen Street, Barrie, Ontario residence and called Barrie police on false pretenses to the unit to watch Catherine Stewart and her clients instruct Central Lock & Key of Barrie to break the front door lock, cut the security chain and enter the unit to change the locks.

** Did we mention that the tenant was moving out already voluntarily and had a court order that instructed Landlord Legal to apply for a Sheriffs order if not vacated as per agreement. Ralph Dykstra,Donald Dykstra and William (Bill) Dykstra corporation owners of Dykstra Bros Electric did not want to honor the agreement they made in LTB court July 18th 2013 and signed by Catherine Stewart with full authority to do so from William Dykstra, the only one of the Dykstra brothers that were present in court.

No Walk through on August 15th 2013 !  No Rent Returned On VacancyNo intention of honoring July 18th LTB Order !

Read details on the BAD Mediation post here : Landlord Legal/Dykstra Bros Electric Mediate in BAD Faith

The tenant files another LTB complaint CET #33911-13 against Catherine Stewart of Landlord legal and Dykstra Bros Electric for harassment and the illegal entry and lock removal incident on August 15th 2013

Catherine Stewart of Landlord legal inc and her clients FAIL TO APPEAR for the hearing date set and DOES NOT NOTIFY the tenant, summoned witnesses or the LTB courts before the hearing.

Barrie police officer M Beard was summoned and present for the hearing as was Central Lock & Key owner and his employee and another witness that was in the unit at the time they forced themselves into the unit without proper documentation to do so.

Stewart sends another paralegal to claim she is out of the country and the judge orders Stewart prove he claim when the hearing is rescheduled again.

The tenant has pendingCentral lock and key enters unit illegally court actions against Central Lock & Key for the break & enter and the Barrie Police department for the tenants rights being violated as they stood by and watched knowing Catherine Stewart did not have any legal documentation for what she instructed the locksmith to do.Another Upper Law Society complaint was filed against C A Stewart of Landlord Legal for her presence at 40 Ellen Street on August 15th 2013 and her instructions to the police and the locksmith.

The tenant has also written the Upper Law Society of Canada over paralegal, Howard Tavroges involvement with Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal in LTB tribunals in Barrie at the same time as the tenant is suing her clients for the agreement he had initially made with her on his behalf.

** Concerns and allegations of past Orillia Legal Clinic, paralegal Howard Tavroges, divulging client privileged information to Catherine Stewart during the launching of the civil suits Stewart & Dykstra Bros Electric filed against the ODSP recipient and tavrogesex tenant had arisen when Stewart used the information to contact the Orillia Community Legal clinic with threatening letters over alleged websites that were discussed in confidential discussions with Howard Tavroges and Orillia Legal Clinic director Michael Hefferon,tenant and involved parties, directly in LTB matters in May & June of 2013.The tenant asks for minutes from the meeting to be provided as recording device was not allowed in this confidential discussion of the tenants right to grow medical marihuanna and the LTB process ahead of him and did receive the information he requested.

** Catherine Stewart also filed a civil lawsuit against the tenant over one of the alleged websites, without any documentation to prove who owned it.

A minimum fine of $25,000 and a year suspension if the tenants ULSC complaints are heard and Stewart found guilty of his claim.

“I have thirteen years experience and know my job” ~ Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal tells Barrie police officers M Beard & Cst Turner

C A Stewart and William Dykstra tell the attending Barrie police officers M Beard and Turner that Stewart had received an email from the Privacy Commissioner of Canada stating the tenant had contacted them and had vacated days before.

Landlord legal inc and William Dykstra could not produce the alleged email they claimed, they walked away when it was requested from the tenant.
** The tenant had earlier conversation that morning with C A Stewarts office to arrange the walk through and receive the last months rent.
** Owners of Dykstra Bros Electric and C A Stewart never had intentions of honoring the agreement they made on July 15th 2013 in LTB tribunal.
** The ex-tenant files civil case SCC #1546-13 in Aug/2013 to retrieve owed funds from Dykstra Bros Electric of Barrie,Ontario.

** The tenant finally receives the owed funds in May 2014, after Dykstra Bros Electric and Landlord Legal knowingly waste Civil Courts time, Orillia Legal Clinics time & resources plus the ODSP recipients time & money for many months, attempting the owed LTB ORDER they had willingly signed, for the order.

** Be sure to read the follow up posts to the end of the civil hearings where Stewart and Dykstra Bros electric finally concede and pay the tenant the money owed from the Sean Henry LTB Order after many efforts and motions not to do so.

The tenant withdraws his CET #33911-13 application and includes the August 15th 2013 illegal entry and lock removal incident in his HRTO  applications against Catherine Stewart of Landlord legal and her clients Ralph Dykstra, William Dykstra and Don Dykstra of Dykstra Bros Electric.

Catherine Stewart filed two (2) civil cases in Barrie courts in November 2013, SCC #1851-13 & SCC #1852-13, against the tenant to attempt to have this website shut down or at the very least have the posts removed and claimed $5000 in property damages, although Catherine Stewart of Landlord legal made a call to the Barrie police under false pretenses and had Central lock & Key illegally enter the unit and the locks were removed and never replaced.

Catherine Stewart, of Landlord Legal inc soon learned that she was in the wrong court room to have this website shut down but continued in civil court for many,many months to detain the HRTO application and the Law Society complaints filed against her clients and her Barrie and Meaford paralegal firm offices,Landlord Legal inc !!!

Stewart requested to withdraw her previous two (2) lawsuits when the tenant had asked for motions to be heard on the matter on May 27th 2014 and received permission to file a counter suit against Catherine Stewart and her clients Ralph Dykstra, William Dykstra, Don Dykstra of Dykstra Bros Electric.

Read further details on Catherine Stewarts SCC #1851-13 civil court claim here : Landlord Legal – Catherine Stewart VS Privacy-Violators

Read further details on Dykstras SCC #1852-13 civil court claim here : Ralph Dykstra,Don Dykstra & Bill Dykstra VS Privacy Violators Website

We will continue to update all the past LTB hearings with the details, the pending Human Rights cases against Landlord Legal and her clients and the Upper Law Society complaints as they compiled.

Paralegals and Lawyers should not or should know NOT TO THREATEN parties they are involved in proceedings against with CRIMINAL ARREST, FURTHER LEGAL THREATS or any kind of threat meant to harm the other party or to delay, coerce or influence the proceedings they are involved in.

Landlord Legal has openly threatened an ex tenant with criminal charges on her Landlord legal website while Human Rights/Civil allegations pending ( http://landlordlegal.ca DEC 2015 to Jan 22nd 2016) of her paralegal firm, alleged boyfriend and Dykstra Bros electric owners allegedly have been defending alleged discrimination against the Human Rights of the tenant.lANDLORD-LEGAL-website-page

Images showing the serious threats to the ex tenant, Tenant Rights Applicant and the Human Rights Applicant made from the owner, Catherine April Stewart,for Landlord Legal inc publicly advertised paralegal services website threatening CRIMINAL CHARGES after numerous unsubstantiated and FALSE ALLEGATIONS made to the Barrie Police..

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to know not to create “CONFLICT of INTEREST” and if so, to remove themselves from ALL legal proceedings they are directly involved in.

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to know they are to advise clients and not act illegally for the clients they represent.

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to know they are not allowed to be present at or participate in illegal acts like break ins or illegal lock changes.

New stories of the Barrie Police officers involvement and the reasons for their contact of the Dykstra Bros Electric ex tenant , who allegedly harassed the ex tenant on behalf of ex OPP officer Paul T Smith and his alleged longtime girlfriend and propertyBarrie police management company owner and paralegal April Catherine Stewart while the tenant was in various courts against them.All Freedom Of Information requests for the incidents have been applied for from the Barrie Police and will be posted as soon as all police matters are compiled and released to Privacy-Violators.com, at the appropriate time concluding certain matters before the Ontario courts.

Do Barrie police play favorites and harass the ex tenant ??

..read the article and decide for yourself the level of their involvement and false calls put forth by Landlord Legal repeatedly unsubstantiated claims and the true intentions they had.

 

Upcoming Events

There are no upcoming events at this time.

September 2019
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday
August 26, 2019 August 27, 2019 August 28, 2019 August 29, 2019 August 30, 2019 August 31, 2019 September 1, 2019
September 2, 2019 September 3, 2019 September 4, 2019 September 5, 2019 September 6, 2019 September 7, 2019 September 8, 2019
September 9, 2019 September 10, 2019 September 11, 2019 September 12, 2019 September 13, 2019 September 14, 2019 September 15, 2019
September 16, 2019 September 17, 2019 September 18, 2019 September 19, 2019 September 20, 2019 September 21, 2019 September 22, 2019
September 23, 2019 September 24, 2019 September 25, 2019 September 26, 2019 September 27, 2019 September 28, 2019 September 29, 2019
September 30, 2019 October 1, 2019 October 2, 2019 October 3, 2019 October 4, 2019 October 5, 2019 October 6, 2019
error: Content is protected !!