Home » Featured Posts

Category Archives: Featured Posts

About Us

We are a help website with links to some very useful Landlord & Tenant Board, Privacy Commissioner, Upper Law Society links and some interesting posts in the news that you can view and follow.

logo_twitter follow us on facebook logo_googleemail us

Categories

Landlord Legal owner, threatens Human Rights Applicant with “Criminal Charges” on paralegals website !

Catherine-StewartA licensed member of the Law Society of Canada, Catherine April Stewart LSUC #P00985, owner of Landlord legal inc has openly threatened to have criminal charges brought against a party that has filed Human Rights allegations against her paralegal firm, LANDLORD LEGAL inc and her Dykstra Bros Electric, Ralph, Donald and William Dykstra clients.

The person referred to has been in, or is still pending with legal matters in Landlord & Tenant Board, Superior Court Canada for civil, Human Rights, and pending Supreme Court of Canada proceedings with parties mentioned throughout the posts on Privacy-Violators.com blog. Bookmark us and share our articles.

Law Society Upper Canada
Rule 2
Professionalism
2.01 INTEGRITY AND CIVILITY
Integrity
2.01 (1) A paralegal has a duty to provide legal services and discharge all responsibilities to clients, tribunals, the public and other members of the legal professions honourably and with integrity.
(2) A paralegal has a duty to uphold the standards and reputation of the
paralegal profession and to assist in the advancement of its goals, organizations and institutions.
Civility
(3) A paralegal shall be courteous and civil, and shall act in good faith with all persons with whom he or she has dealings in the course of his or her practice.
2.02 UNDERTAKINGS & TRUST CONDITIONS
2.02 (1)A paralegal shall fulfill every undertaking given and shall not give an undertaking that cannot be fulfilled.

(2) Except in exceptional circumstances, a paralegal shall give his or her undertaking in writing or confirm it in writing as soon as practicable after giving it.

(3) Unless clearly stated in the undertaking, a paralegal’s undertaking is a personal promise and it is his or her personal responsibility.

(4) A paralegal shall honor every trust condition once accepted.

RULE 4: Advocacy
duty to clients, tribunals and others, disclosure of documents, interviewing witnesses, communication with witnesses giving testimony, the paralegal as witness and dealing with unrepresented persons

Outside Interests and Public Office
(4) A paralegal who engages in another profession, business, occupation or other outside interest or who holds public office concurrently with the provision of legal services, shall not allow the outside interest or public office to jeopardize the paralegal’s integrity, independence, or competence.
(5) A paralegal shall not allow involvement in an outside interest or public office to impair the exercise of his or her independent judgment on behalf of a client.

TRUST CONDITIONS
2.02
(1) A paralegal shall fulfill every undertaking given and shall not give an undertaking that cannot be fulfilled.
(2) Except in exceptional circumstances, a paralegal shall give his or her undertaking in writing or confirm it in writing as soon as practicable after giving it.
(3) Unless clearly stated in the undertaking, a paralegal’s undertaking is a personal promise and it is his or her personal responsibility.
(4) A paralegal shall honor every trust condition once accepted.

RULE 7: Duty to Licensees and Others – duty to act with courtesy and good faith

RULE 8: Practice Management – general obligations, marketing, advertising and insurance

RULE 9: Responsibility to the Law Society – communications from the Law Society, duties to report, professional misconduct and conduct unbecoming a paralegal

The Law Society has never been notified by paralegal Catherine Stewart, owner of Landlord legal inc, that allegations of illegal entry and illegal lock change had been brought against this paralegal Aug 2013 in Barrie LTB court, by the HR applicant and NONE of the accused showed for the hearing in Sept 2013.

The Law Society has not been notified by Landlord Legal inc that there has been pending Human Rights allegations against her legal firm since May 2014, and is now including a pending amendment for allegations of personal Human Rights breaches.


The Human Rights (HR) Applicant has a pending claim and allegedly added Catherine April Stewart as a pending personal Respondent to the alleged HR discrimination allegations brought up by an ex tenant of Dykstra Bros Electric of Barrie, Ontario.

cropped-cbk.jpgLegal documents were delivered Aug 11 2015 to the Respondents address on file for pending Human Rights proceedings against her clients and her legal firm, located at 117 Bayfield Street Barrie, Ontario when Catherine April Stewart tried AGAIN, to have the Applicant charged, for trespassing, or whatever the police would be willing to charge him with from her allegations !!

The Barrie Police officer in question, harassed the ex tenant further, when he called the Human Rights applicants, personal cell number.

The officer demanded that the Human Rights Applicant come into the police station, again for questioning, the Applicant told him “NO FUCKING WAY” and told him to stop calling the cell number, stop harassing him and talk to Mr Graves, the person who delivered the legal documents if he had a problem.The phone number was changed because of the constant harassment and demands of the Barrie police from these harassing and vexatious complaints.

Another false allegation to the Barrie police involved Detective Cst Steele, in which he called the Human Rights Applicants cell phone as well and THREATENED to have a WARRANT ISSUED if he did not turn himself into Barrie Police.

The allegations of Howard Tavroges and Catherine Stewart stemming from the HR applicant ATTENDING a public and open forum Landlord and tenant Board courtroom, to obtain FURTHER PROOF of Howards Tavroges conflict of interest allegations, releasing private and privileged information allegations, to Landlord Legal inc, while he had signed working as a representative for Orillia Legal Clinic,in a paralegal capacity for the ex tenant.
Tavroges signed the joint agreement with Ms Stewart on July 18th 2013 for an LTB Order, which she made the tenant fight her firm in Superior Court to retrieve monies owed, while Mr Tavroges had been or was representing Landlord Legal inc, in LTB matters at the same time legal proceedings connected were pending in 2013 and 2014, and still pending in 2016.

” It was a hiccup of the law ” ~ Quote by Barrie police detective Steele, after calling his cell number given to him from Stewarts files, and threatening a warrant for the arrest of the Human rights Applicants, after receiving complaints and further vexatious and harassing allegations from C A Stewart & Howard Tavroges.

Detective Steeles as a police officer, C A Stewart and H Tavroges as licensed paralegals, should have known or aught to known, Human rights Codes, the Criminal Code of Canada as well as, RTA 2006,LSUC Rules of Conduct, Rules of Procedures for proceedings and all other RIGHTS of the HR Applicant.

Other alleged police contact, threats and harassment will be posted on PRIVACY VIOLATORS website, when ALL the requested freedom of Information documents, video recordings and incident reports are collected.

Stewart and Tavroges as paralegals should have known or aught to have known the LTB Tribunal was an open and public forum for EVERYBODY, and as such the Applicant can attend whenever he feels the need to watch justice in action or whatever other reason he chooses to do so.

C A Stewart should have known or aught to have known not to obstruct legal methods of delivering legal documents and would probably not be served as often, in front of her colleges and peers, at the Landlord and Tenant Board Tribunal courtroom, located on the 2nd floor of 34 Simcoe Street, Barrie Ontario, Canada.

The documents were hand delivered to the legal office of Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal inc, by a Mr B Graves, and not the involved party, though he had the right according to the Rules of Procedures to do so, when Stewart called the Barrie police again, this time, Cst Bareo (not sure of name spelling, but will be checking, when freedom of information and incident report requests are completed for ALL the incidents.)

Ralph Dykstra, William Dykstra and Donald Dykstra of Dykstra Bros Electric ltd / Paul T Smith / Catherine A Stewart / Landlord legal inc are ALL Respondents to the Human rights allegations, and have claimed to have hired Toronto based David Strashin, Sept 2015 to represent ALL parties, after paralegal Catherine A Stewart has represented involved parties since May 15th 2013, and alleged to have seriously delayed legal proceedings deliberately.

David Strashin has NOT FOLLOWED the Rules of Procedures for the HRTO 16250-13 (Dykstra Bros Electric) & HRTO 17699-14 (Landlord Legal inc / C A Stewart / Paul Smith). David Strashin is known to have other past business references, or relationships from 2011, with Landlord Legal as mentioned on the paralegals website on “In the News” category on, Hoarding Tenants.

The owner of Landlord legal inc, paralegal Catherine Stewart, has called the Barrie police on many unsubstantiated and false allegations against the HR Applicant since May 2013 when she was hired by Ralph Dykstra, Donald Dykstra and William Dykstra.

The property manager Catherine Stewart and her Dykstra Bros are alleged to have illegally entered/altered locks on Aug 15 2013.

Catherine Stewart, Ralph Dykstra, Donald Dykstra and William Dykstra DID NOT SHOW for the tenants rights application CET 33911-13 that accused them of the break in and lock change while the Barrie police watched.

Catherine Stewart calls the Barrie police on FALSE PRETENSES to “KEEP THE PEACE” knowing an LTB ORDER was in place, signed personally by Catherine Stewart ( SEE PARALEGAL RULES OF UNDERTAKINGS) and the tenant had legal possession of his rental unit !!. Officers M Beard and Cst Turner incident reports stating they told Stewart she DID NOT HAVE LEGAL DOCUMENTATION or the RIGHT TO ENTER but Catherine Stewart orders it done anyways !!

The paralegals alleged boyfriend Paul T Smith is also accused of Human rights violations against the past tenant caused when Paul Smith attended 40 Ellen Street, Barrie, Ontario in May 2013 to perform duties for Dykstra Bros, and Catherine Stewart.

Paralegals and Lawyers should not or should know NOT TO THREATEN or harass parties they are involved in proceedings against with CRIMINAL ARREST, FURTHER LEGAL THREATS or any kind of threat meant to harm the other party or to delay, coerce or influence the proceedings they are involved in.

Catherine-Stewart-pic1-150x120Landlord Legal inc owner has openly threatened an ex tenant with criminal charges on her Landlord legal website while Human Rights/Civil allegations pending ( http://landlordlegal.ca DEC 2015 to Jan 22nd 2016) of her paralegal firm, alleged boyfriend and Dykstra Bros electric owners allegedly have been defending alleged discrimination against the Human Rights of the tenant.

Images showing the serious threats to the ex tenant, Tenant Rights Applicant and the Human Rights Applicant made from the owner, Catherine April Stewart,for Landlord Legal inc publicly advertised paralegal services website threatening CRIMINAL CHARGES after numerous unsubstantiated and FALSE ALLEGATIONS made to the Barrie Police.
Read the posts surrounding the Barrie police confrontations and the paralegals attempts to have the Human Rights Applicant charged with anything !!:  http://privacy-violators.com/the-posts-watcher/barrie-police-continue-to-harass-ex-tenant-for-barrie-paralegal-catherine-april-stewart/

Barrie police refuse to charge the paralegal numerous times with the numerous unsubstantiated and false allegations she makes, of the ongoing harassment, allegations of false documents submitted for legal proceedings or for Applicant to press criminal harassment charges for the break in and illegal lock change witnessed by attending police officers and instructing paralegal that she had NO RIGHT or LEGAL DOCUMENT required to enter 40 Ellen Street, Barrie Ont on August 15th 2013. when Catherine Stewart and the Dykstras’ were present and proceeded to order the locksmith to cut security chain and enter unit illegally.

.

Catherine Stewart, owner of Landlord Legal filed civil matters Oct 2013 against the ex tenant, knowing of the pending HUMAN RIGHTS matters, amended the SCC 1851-13 application after a year to a personal claim, being told the matter was in the wrong court and needed to go to a higher court to deal with the publication of legal proceedings against her and her Dykstra Bros Electric company of Barrie clients.

The paralegal website also depicts or has publicized a photo of Nima Wilson, a black female tenant, that was evicted several times and the story of the tenants involvement with the process, further harassing and embarrassing the poor tenant for Landlord-Legal-website-page-and-info-1Landlord legal paralegal firms own eviction advertising purposes for LANDLORDS to “EVICT TROUBLED TENANTS”

Catherine Stewart’s personal SCC1851-13 allegations are still pending, and public record, as of Feb 2016 and after she filed original claim in Oct 2013 to delay the Law Society complaints and the Human Rights allegations against her alleged boyfriend, her firm and Dykstra Bros Electric of Barrie owners’.

The SCC1851-13 civil matter filed by C A Stewart is still pending, as Stewart has taken NO ACTION after being told it was IN THE WRONG court.

Catherine Stewart also claimed she had hired David Strashin to represent her for the higher court in July 2014 but again has not taken any action to further her claims.

The Applicant has claimed his Charter Rights, Fundamental Freedoms 2(b) and will continue to defend the public forums, open court and HR publicized findings in all proceedings he is involved in with Catherine Stewart, Paul T Smith,Ralph Dykstra,Donald Dykstra and William Dykstra.

The paralegal should have informed her clients the LTB, Civil and Human Rights are public forums and public documents to the proceedings and freedom of information requested are public documents as stated on the bottom of the LTB forms and additional forms filed for proceedings and can be used as such.

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to know not to create “CONFLICT of INTEREST” and if so, to remove themselves from ALL legal proceedings they are directly involved in.

Howard tavrogesHoward Tavroges is accused of releasing paralegal privileged information to owner Catherine Stewart after working for the Orillia Community Catherine-StewartLegal Clinic and representing the HR applicant during LTB matters for the July 18th 2013 Joint Submission agreement and further working for Landlord legal representing her firm in LTB matters while she fights the LTB ORDER signed by Catherine Stewart and Howard Tavroges.

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to know they are to advise clients and not act illegally for the clients they represent

 

CHARTER OF RIGHTS
Section 2(b)
Freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication

You have the right to think and believe what you want. You have the right to express those thoughts, without being afraid of being punished or silenced. The Supreme Court of Canada has said these freedoms are important for:

self-fulfillment
participation in social and political decision-making
the free exchange of ideas

Freedom of the press is essential in a democracy. Newspapers and other media are an important way for people to learn about what is going on and express their ideas.

Paralegals and what is known as “SHARP PRACTICE”

This post refers to the term “Sharp Practice” in relationship to the Law Society of Upper Canada (LSUC) Rules of Conduct, for paralegals and lawyers, refers to and occurs when the LSUC licensed parties use methods to abuse the process of legal proceedings that are not following the rules of the Law Society, not warranted, not standardized or legal, meant to hide their clients and disrupt or delay ANY legal proceedings or ANY COURT matters they are involved in !!.

Sharp practice is a pejorative phrase to describe sneaky or cunning behavior that is technically within the rules of the law but borders on being unethical

Gaming the system (also referred to as gaming the rules, bending the rules, abusing the system, cheating the system, milking the system, playing the system, or working the system) can be defined as using the rules and procedures meant to protect a system in order, instead, to manipulate the system for a desired outcome

Legal abuse refers to abuses associated with both civil and criminal legal action. Abuse can originate from nearly any part of the legal system, including frivolous and vexatious litigants, abuses by law enforcement, incompetent, careless or corrupt attorneys and misconduct from the judiciary itself.

Legal abuse is responsible not only for injustice, but also harm to physical, psychological and societal health

Vexatious litigation is legal action which is brought, regardless of its merits, solely to harass or subdue an adversary. It may take the form of a primary frivolous lawsuit or may be the repetitive, burdensome, and unwarranted filing of meritless motions in a matter which is otherwise a meritorious cause of action. Filing vexatious litigation is considered an abuse of the judicial process and may result in sanctions against the offender.

A single action, even a frivolous one, is usually not enough to raise a litigant to the level of being declared vexatious. Rather, a pattern of frivolous legal actions is typically required to rise to the level of vexatious. Repeated and severe instances by a single lawyer or firm can result in eventual disbarment.

SHARP PRACTICE is frowned upon by the Law Society of Upper Canada Rules of Conduct.Many Paralegals and Lawyers use Sharp Practice in their legal firms participation in the legal system further causing back logs of legal proceedings needlessly in defense of their firm or their clients.

Examples of Sharp Practice, is not showing, or notifying parties, using acting agents, locksmiths and other parties related to their cause, that have NO PHYSICAL BUSINESS ADDRESS anywhere, to deliver Court Summonses when they are, or clients are involved in legal proceedings.

Remember SHARP Practice = do whatever it takes, does not matter if they present at, or commit a criminal act, the LSUC rules, the Criminal Code, PIPEDA, Chart Rights, Human Rights or the Rules and procedures in any court proceeding you or your client are involved in.

Should you breach other peoples INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS if your a well known LANDLORD ONLY RIGHTS ACTIVIST  ?
Rights are for everybody…not just landlords !

How do you justify defending the rights of anyone… when you are alleged to have constantly violate the rights of others ??

Eviction Specialist, C A Stewart of Landlord legal inc refused to accept her alleged boyfriends Paul t Smith summons issued June 2013, delivered to her legal office at 117 Bayfield Street when Smith acted as an agent on Landlord legal inc behalf and her law firm was directly involved in the LTB Tribunal, and HR matters the tenant had filed.

Eviction Specialist, C A Stewart of Landlord legal inc, uses agents or sub contractors companies like Paul Richardsons’ Central Lock & Key, that has NO BRICK & MORTAR STORE, to enter tenants units, change locks and other duties she needs done. Central Lock & Key were hard to get a summons served to, as they are MOBILE UNIT ONLY and Mr Richardson son, Cody Richardson threatened the tenant. and tried to hit his vehicle with the Central lock & Key company van while attempting to serve them summonses for Superior Court Civil matters.

Paul Richardson saves a phone recording for 2 years from attempts to get him served for LTB matters in 2013, and lies about the date of the recording, and plays it on the witness stand to allegedly deceive the court, and help C A Stewarts Dykstra clients in court.

Using “acting agents” or “sub contractors” that are next to impossible to summons, or that paralegals can block access to, is a very common practice done among paralegals and lawyers who practice SHARP PRACTICE frowned by the LSUC.

Landlord Legal signs and enters testimony and allegations from Rob Scruton that have not been heard in any court, not even once into Dykstra civil matters.

Landlord Legal enters and serves documents, evidence and her signed statement of Scrutons testimony breaking rules of procedures and rules of a fair proceeding.

Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal, and her clients Ralph Dykstra, William Dykstra and Donald Dykstra of Dykstra Bros Electric, DO NOT SHOW AGAIN for the motions to dismiss the evidence and testimony Stewart entered against the rules of procedures for civil hearing SCC#1852-13.

Landlord Legal places Rob Srcuton on her witness list, though she serves against the rules by not giving “proper notice” or the required “will says” to interview the surprise witness from Innisfil, Ontario, Canada. Stewart does this surprise tactic less than 2 weeks before a hearing date. All evidence and will says were court ordered to be delivered to all parties prior to the Landlord Legal inc tactic used.

Catherine Stewart should have known or aught to have known the rules of procedures for small claims court.

Catherine Stewart of landlord legal should have known or aught to have known it was wrong to sign affidavits for her witness, Rob Scruton, when Stewart is directly involved in the Civil proceedings and Human Rights allegations against her firm. False testimony and conflict of interest concerns and allegations just to influence a proceeding Landlord legal and her Dykstra clients are directly involved in.

Catherine Stewart of Landlord legal should have known or aught to have known the testimony she signed for Rob Scruton had never seen one day in court, but enters his testimony she signed anyways to a legal proceeding she was involved in directly.

Paul T Smith, retired OPP officer of 30 years is another witness NOT ON THE WITNESS LIST EITHER, Catherine Stewart of landlord legal inc has not provided proper notice or the will says, for her alleged boyfriend. Paul T Smith ends up on the stand in civil court Dec 2015, for C A Sewarts Dykstra clients, although he is connected to breaching Human Rights while acting as an agent for Landlord legal and Dykstra Bros Electric,  and had absolutely no knowledge of the allegations in her Dykstra clients proceedings.

Landlord Legal should have known it was wrong to keep using alleged boyfriend Paul Smith, to serve the documents against the rules of procedures, when her alleged boyfriend and Stewart have pending Human rights allegations against them since May 2014.

After not showing for the motions to dismiss the evidence, Stewart has the motions heard the same day and in front of the same Judge hearing the Dykstra hearing.

Stewart also files another motion to split ( after motioning to join ) her personal SCC#1851-13 civil matter filed the same day as Dykstras claim, which Stewart was  told by the Judge in March 2014, was filed in the wrong court to deal with her demands to have this website shut down.Filed Oct 2013 and still in the wrong court in February 0f 2016…can you say harassment and vexatious

Landlord Legal motions to bring her personal civil matter to be heard with her clients in 2014, HR applicant demanding rights to a speedy trial hearing

Paralegals and Lawyers have an obligation to Minimize costs during ALL legal proceedings against ANY party.

Paralegals and Lawyers have the obligation to HONOR UNDERTAKINGS they have agreed to and have signed on behalf of their clients.

Paralegals and Lawyers have the obligation to protect confidential and privileged information and documents they have obtained.

Paralegals and lawyers have the obligation to follow ALL THE RULES OF CONDUCT of the Law Society of Upper Canada.

Paralegals and Lawyers have the obligation to follow THE RULES OF PROCEDURES in all legal proceedings.

Licensed Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to have known all the Rules and Regulations of the ;

  1. Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO)
  2. Criminal Code of Canada
  3. Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (CDSA)
  4. Personal Information and Electronic Document Act (PIPEDA)
  5. Residential Tenancies Act 2006 (RTA)
  6. Rules of Procedure in ALL COURTS representing any party
  7. Rules of Conduct (LSUC)
  8. Should be Knowledgeable in the area they practice

Paralegals and Lawyers should not or should know NOT TO THREATEN or harass parties they are involved in proceedings against with CRIMINAL ARREST, FURTHER LEGAL THREATS, NO TRESPASS OR NO CONTACT LETTERS or any kind of threat meant to harm the other party or to delay, coerce or influence the proceedings they are involved in.

Catherine-StewartLandlord Legal inc owner has openly threatened an ex tenant with criminal charges on her Landlord legal website while Human Rights/Civil allegations pending ( http://landlordlegal.ca DEC 2015 to Jan 22nd 2016) of her paralegal firm, alleged boyfriend and Dykstra Bros electric owners allegedly have been defending alleged discrimination against the Human Rights of the tenant.

Images showing the serious threats to the ex tenant, Tenant Rights Applicant and the Human Rights Applicant made from the owner, Catherine April Stewart,for Landlord Legal inc publicly advertised paralegal services website threatening CRIMINAL CHARGES after numerous unsubstantiated and FALSE ALLEGATIONS made to the Barrie Police.
Read the posts surrounding the Barrie police confrontations and the paralegals attempts to have the Human Rights Applicant charged with anything !!:  http://privacy-violators.com/the-posts-watcher/do-barrie-police-continue-to-harass-ex-tenant-for-barrie-paralegal-catherine-april-stewart/Barrie police logo

Barrie police refuse to charge the paralegal numerous times with the numerous unsubstantiated and false allegations she makes, of the ongoing harassment, allegations of false documents submitted for legal proceedings or for Applicant to press criminal harassment charges for the break in and illegal lock change witnessed by attending police officers and instructing paralegal that she had NO RIGHT or LEGAL DOCUMENT required to enter 40 Ellen Street, Barrie Ont on August 15th 2013. when Catherine Stewart and the Dykstras’ were present and proceeded to order the locksmith to cut security chain and enter unit illegally.

 

Landlord Legal website.

Catherine Stewart, owner of Landlord Legal filed civil matters Oct 2013 against the ex tenant, knowing of the pending HUMAN RIGHTS matters, amended the SCC 1851-13 application after a year to a personal claim, being told the matter was in the wrong court and needed to go to a higher court to deal with the publication of legal proceedings against her and her Dykstra Bros Electric company of Barrie clients.

Catherine Stewart has locksmiths attend to remove locks after 2 Barrie police officers tell Landlord Legal, that it is  “not legal” and “no proper documentation” to do so, but DOES ANYWAYS  illegally but states on her website the proper way to get to the SHERIFFS’ office and get the proper paperwork… We figured it is a case of “do as I say and not as I do , or teach”. 

Catherine A Stewart of Landlord legal also gives lectures that instructs and teaches landlords not to put tenants on the defensive as well, and to “GO LOOK IN THE WINDOWS WHEN TENANT NOT HOME. wow, can anyone say Trespassing,not to mention teaching  landlords, real estate persons, agents and other attendees a serious tenant invasion of privacy.

Catherine Stewarts personal SCC1851-13 allegations are still pending, and are public record, as of Feb 2016 and after filing original claim in Oct 2013, to delay the Law Society complaints, and Human Rights allegations against her company, her alleged boyfriend, and Dykstra Bros Electric owners’.

The SCC1851-13 civil matter filed by C A Stewart is still pending, as Stewart has taken NO ACTION after being told it was IN THE WRONG court.

Catherine Stewart also claimed she had hired David Strashin to represent her for the higher court in July 2014 but again has not taken any action to further her claims.

The Applicant has claimed his Charter Rights, Fundamental Freedoms 2(b) and will continue to defend the public forums, open court and HR publicized findings in all proceedings he is involved in with Catherine Stewart, Paul T Smith,Ralph Dykstra,Donald Dykstra and William Dykstra.

The paralegal should have informed her clients the LTB, Civil and Human Rights are public forums and public documents to the proceedings and freedom of information requested are public documents as stated on the bottom of the LTB forms and additional forms filed for proceedings and can be used as such.

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to know not to create “CONFLICT of INTEREST” and if so, to remove themselves from ALL legal proceedings they are directly involved in.

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to know they are to advise clients and not act illegally for the clients they represent.

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to know they are to advise and regulate those clients on how to behave during proceedings with courtesy, civility, integrity and honor and not bring unrelated matters, disrupt proceedings with threats, unsubstantiated claims or any other method used to intimidate or influence a proceeding.

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to know they are not allowed to be present at or participate in illegal acts like break ins or illegal lock changes.

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to know it is wrong and against the rules of procedures to block all CONTACT when the legal representative has come on record and has the obligation to receive legal documents required for legal proceedings without justifiable reasons or a properly applied for peace bond, injunction or court order that states the reasons and the remedy.

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to know NOT TO FILE vexatious legal proceedings meant to delay proceedings and harm applicants financial situation causing further intentional harm.

Paralegals and lawyers should know or aught to know the rules and responsibility governing minimizing losses and the rules for UNDERTAKINGS.

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to know to “CONTACT” other parties involved if “NOT ATTENDING” within a reasonable amount of time, to not further costs from “witness fees”, waste the “courts time” and waste  “applicants time”

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to know the rules and, to be civil, courteous and respectful to everyone, and to respect ALL RIGHTS given to the Applicants or Respondents in any legal proceeding.

PIPEDA and your practice

Paralegals and Lawyers should have known or aught to have known to act with Civility,Integrity and Honesty at all times when dealing with another party or their representatives.

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to have known it was wrong and illegal to enter or misrepresent documents or information into legal proceedings when the document does NOT EXIST in any stated court files.

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to have known to keep confidential documents, court evidence and other privileged legal information secured and away from other tenants they rent to in the same building as their LEGAL OFFICES.

Meaford office closed June 2015

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to know to CONTACT legal proceedings and ALL PARTIES, they have come ON RECORD for the proceedings with phone,fax, and contact information and to NOTIFY ALL PROCEEDINGS of ANY CHANGES to office closures and changes to the information they had provided to the courts and the opposing parties.

Landlord Legal cubicle officeCatherine Stewart of Landlord Legal rents 2 buildings to an account company firm, who has received many confidential legal documents unsecured several times on behalf of Catherine Stewart of Landlord legal inc, from hand deliveries and process severs.

Paralegals and Lawyers who switch offices, and block communication from parties involved in legal proceedings are in fact breaking the rules of procedures, hiding their clients and preventing the ease of communication meant to make legal proceedings transparent, easier and straight forward is one form of known  “HARD PRACTICE”.

There are a lot of paralegals that do “SHARP PRACTICE” to make sure their clients have an edge over the Applicants to further financial stress, hinder, delay and frustrate the involved parties and interfere with the legal processes.

Read the stories surrounding Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal and her clients, Ralph Dykstra, Landlord Legal owner Catherine April StewartWilliam Dykstra, Donald Dykstra, owners of Dykstra Bros Electric of Barrie as well as the allegations against Landlord legal and Catherine Stewart, use your judgement and see if you feel that Landlord legal inc uses the frowned upon Hard Practices in her legal firm.

Let Privacy Violators know of ANY paralegal or Lawyer that you have been involved with uses methods listed here on our website to gain advantages over the other party they are involved with in legal proceedings.

The Human Rights allegations against Ralph Dykstra, William Dykstra and Donald Dykstra of Dykstra Bros Electric company of Barrie, Ontario started in 2013 and proceedings continue at the HRTO as of January 20th 2016 when David Strashin, apparently came on record but has not notified the HRTO or involved parties of this fact and according to the HRTO Rules of Procedures during proceedings.

The Human Rights allegations against Paul Smith, Catherine Stewart and Landlord Legal  paralegal firm of Barrie, Ontario started in 2013 and proceedings continue at the HRTO as of January 20th 2016, when David Strashin, apparently came on record to represent the LTB paralegal who has represented, and delayed the Dykstra Bros allegations, for the last 3 years, in HRTO, but has not notified the HRTO or involved parties of this fact according to the HRTO Rules of Procedures.

With the HR Applicant filing many LSUC allegations, complaints, and concerns starting back from May 24th 2013, with many more complaints to file up to February 2016, Landlord legal has not even been investigated once in the last 3 years by the Law Society of Upper Canada, or the Barrie police from the many complaints filed by the applicant while waiting for the pending HR matter to finish.
Stewart had in Oct 2013 blocked the Law Society complaints by filing and stalling vexatious claims to delay the complaints and the human Rights allegations filed against her legal firm, boyfriend and her Dykstra clients.

3 years and STILL working as a paralegal in our legal system, with many pending unanswered allegations, including illegal entry, illegal lock change, abuse of process allegations, Rules of procedures breaches,entering false documents into legal proceedings allegations, harassment allegations, threatening, coercing and the Human Rights allegations against her legal firm, boyfriend and her Dykstra Bros Electric clients, but still in the legal system.

The HR applicant has requested a time extension from the Law Society of Upper Canada, to file the many allegations and concerns regarding Landlord legal inc, Howard Tavroges and new claims against David Strashin of Toronto. Read the posts on the Law Society of Upper Canada refusing to investigate complaints filed June 2013 against Landlord legal inc

The Law Society of Upper Canada complaints filed against Howard Tavroges, and Catherine Stewart of Landlord legal inc of 117 Bayfield Street, Barrie have been delayed when Stewart claims over legal proceedings are ongoing and the LSUC delayed investigating the May 2013 claims brought forth by the ex tenant over privacy invasion and illegal break in and illegal lock change after a mediated settlement July 18 2013 in LTB Tribunal matters.

Additional methods known to be Sharp Practice will be added to the above compilation as time and need to educate warrant it.

Report Sharp practice and additional  methods used here and we can discuss the rise in court proceedings caused by the needless delays of the paralegal or Lawyers involved.

CHARTER OF RIGHTS
Section 2(b)
Freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication

You have the right to think and believe what you want. You have the right to express those thoughts, without being afraid of being punished or silenced. The Supreme Court of Canada has said these freedoms are important for:

self-fulfillment
participation in social and political decision-making
the free exchange of ideas

Freedom of the press is essential in a democracy. Newspapers and other media are an important way for people to learn about what is going on and express their ideas.

Section 15.

Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

Human Rights allegations filed against Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal and Paul T Smith for discrimination against tenant Medical Marihuana grower

Catherine-StewartA Human Rights application was filed May 2014 by the ex tenant, against Catherine April Stewart of Landlord legal inc, acting agent and alleged boyfriend, 30 yr retired OPP Officer, process server and personal private investigator Paul Smith, for allegedly breaching  the Human Rights Code, discriminating against him when they illegally evicted the tenant for allegedly growing more plants than they figured he was entitled and licensed for.

Law Society complaints have been filed by the ex tenant against Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal and her associate Howard Tavroges for CONFLICT OF INTEREST, RELEASING PRIVATE CONFIDENTIAL information allegations when  Howard Tavroges represented the tenant in several LTB matters, including the mediated agreement she failed to honor July 18th 2013, and represents Landlord Legal in many LTB Tribunal matters on her companies behalf.

LTB matters that Howard Tavroges represented for Landlord legal inc from July 2013 to Jan 2016 were recorded to send to the LSUC showing Tavroges worked for, and released private information to Catherine Stewart while Stewart proceeded in Superior Court against the tenant.

Howard Tavroges in May,June,July of 2013 had been a LTB paralegal with the Orillia Community Legal Clinic and had talked with and represented the tenant in LTB proceedings, also signed the LTB Joint Submission Order, against Catherine Stewart of Landlord legal inc,Ralph Dykstra, William Dykstra and Donald Dykstra of Dykstra Bros Electric. The tenant had to take Catherine Stewart and her Dykstra Bros clients to civil court to retrieve the LTB Order that Catherine Stewart personally signed the UNDERTAKING for her Dykstra clients.

The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO) received an application that was filed back in December 2013 from an ex tenant against Ralph Dykstra, William Dykstra and Don Dykstra of Dykstra Bros Electric of Barrie, Ontario concerning alleged medical marihuana privacy violations and discriminating against the tenant when they insist he only grows four plants when licensed for many more than they want him to grow.

Human-Rights0004The Human Rights claim is for discriminating against him for not allowing him to grow more than four (4) plants when he was licensed for an excess of that amount and was growing within his given license requirements legally. It is also states claims of Medical Marihuana Access Program privacy violation issues plus threats of reprisal, acts of reprisal, harassment and the illegal reasons stated in the N5 that Stewart attempt to evict him on un Constitutional grounds.

The court hearings between the tenant and Dykstra Bros electric started back in May 2013 when the tenant had taken the landlords, Ralph Dykstra, William Dykstra and Don Dykstra to the Barrie Landlord and Tenant Board tribunal for discussing private, confidential Health Canada Medical Marihuana Access program information with their very long time family friend and tenant, Nancy Groves.

LTB Judge Sean Henry heard the case in and determined the landlords did discuss confidential information with tenant & their longtime friend Nancy Groves (aka Nancy Aikens) on or about March 27th 2013. Read further details from the May 7th hearing here: Barrie Dykstra Bros Electric vs Tenant Privacy

The LTB tribunal hearings did not end in May between the tenant and Dykstra Bros Electric with a simple apology.Nooooo !!

Ralph Dykstra, William Dykstra and Don Dykstra of Dykstra Bros Electric, hire Catherine April Stewart of Landlord Legal inc on May 13th to evict the tenant.

On May 23rd 2013, Catherine Stewart of Landlord legal or one of her agents posted a letter on behalf of her clients, the Dykstras, openly displaying private and confidential Medical Marihuana Access Program (MMAP) information concerning the tenant along with a “24 hour Intent to Enter” notice.The letter further demanded the tenant produce MMAP license information to her agent that was to perform the “Routine Maintenance” as she claimed in the 24 hour the intent to enter notice.

Paul Smith, alleged boyfriend and acting agent for Dykstra Bros entered 40 Ellen Street, Barrie for the notice, though a letter was given to Landlord Legal at their Barrie office located at, 117 Bayfield Street, the same morning as receiving her notice and revealing letter explaining a birthday party was already scheduled.

Read further details on the “Routine Maintenance” that turned into a full blown inspection with 100’s of photos being taken, many of personal and private documents, information belonging to the tenant. The inspection was done in spite of the tenants birthday party and in front of the tenants remaining guests from the scheduled birthday party. These actions led to a Privacy Commissioner of Canada complaint later handled by Cristine Derenzis from that office.Read the details of the entry and further allegations brought forth by the ex tenant of Dykstra Bros Electric company from Barrie Ontario.  : Landlords “Intent to Enter” & Your Privacy

The tenant filed another LTB hearing CET #31816-13 against Dykstras and their agent for harassment and disclosing the confidential MMAP information and had a June 27th hearing date set to hear the complaint.

Landlord Legal owner Catherine April StewartCatherine Stewart of Landlord Legal inc had sent a DO NOT CONTACT her or her clients or TRESPASS on the properties of Landlord Legal inc and her clients, the Dykstra brothers, to the Community Legal clinic in Orillia, Ontario

Stewart refused to provide copies to the tenant of the “Routine Maintenance”, inspection report or copies of the photos that her acting agent Paul smith had taken may 24th 2013 in written or email requests.

Catherine Stewart, sole owner of Landlord Legal inc refuses the LTB court summons,even from attending Barrie police officers, whom she had called on the tenant, on false pretenses, for her alleged boyfriend and agent,private investigator,process server and ex OPP officer Paul T Smith while attempting to serve the summons to Landlord Legal paralegal office on Bayfield Street, Barrie,Ontario.A follow up story to the Barrie police harassment allegations from the Dykstra Bros Electric ex tenant in relation to Smith sgt status before he retired from service and went to work as an acting agent for the paralegal firm landlord legal inc,Barrie,Meaford offices.

Catherine Stewart does not fill out the N5 properly identifying other hearings, past or present that were related to her application and before the Landlord & Tenant Board tribunal. The tenant had a previous hearing related to her N5 application, but not noted properly on the LTB forms. Landlord Legal owner Catherine Stewart was quoted as saying “I have 13 yrs experience, don’t tell me how to do my job” to Barrie police Aug 15th 2013.

Catherine Stewart files an N5 ” Notice of Early Termination” on grounds the tenant would not produce the Health Canada MMAP information she demanded in her letter and refused to give an un blocked copy to Paul Smith, who asked for the license information without any authority to do so and in front of the tenants guests. The tenant was posting all of his LTB hearing information following his adventures through Landlord and Tenant tribunal complaints against the paralegal and her clients and Stewart wanted the postings stopped and this website shut down.

The LTB matter is mediated by LTB mediator Dawn Lewis, Community Legal clinic paralegal Howard Tavroges ( NO LONGER WITH ORILLIA LEGAL CLINIC, though his current Upper Law Society of Canada profile still shows the Legal Clinic phone number and fax) theorig-mediation-agreement tenant and Catherine Stewart.

The mediated agreement order was to return last months rent and tenant would voluntarily move out on August 15th 2013 to file his Human Rights claim in peace and his living environment was already poisoned from the Dykstras revealing his confidential MMAP information.

** On move out day, August 15th 2013, Catherine Stewart of landlord Legal and her clients were present at the tenants 40 Ellen Street, Barrie, Ontario residence and called Barrie police on false pretenses to the unit to watch Catherine Stewart and her clients instruct Central Lock & Key of Barrie to break the front door lock, cut the security chain and enter the unit to change the locks.

** Did we mention that the tenant was moving out already voluntarily and had a court order that instructed Landlord Legal to apply for a Sheriffs order if not vacated as per agreement. Ralph Dykstra,Donald Dykstra and William (Bill) Dykstra corporation owners of Dykstra Bros Electric did not want to honor the agreement they made in LTB court July 18th 2013 and signed by Catherine Stewart with full authority to do so from William Dykstra, the only one of the Dykstra brothers that were present in court.

No Walk through on August 15th 2013 !  No Rent Returned On VacancyNo intention of honoring July 18th LTB Order !

Read details on the BAD Mediation post here : Landlord Legal/Dykstra Bros Electric Mediate in BAD Faith

The tenant files another LTB complaint CET #33911-13 against Catherine Stewart of Landlord legal and Dykstra Bros Electric for harassment and the illegal entry and lock removal incident on August 15th 2013

Catherine Stewart of Landlord legal inc and her clients FAIL TO APPEAR for the hearing date set and DOES NOT NOTIFY the tenant, summoned witnesses or the LTB courts before the hearing.

Barrie police officer M Beard was summoned and present for the hearing as was Central Lock & Key owner and his employee and another witness that was in the unit at the time they forced themselves into the unit without proper documentation to do so.

Stewart sends another paralegal to claim she is out of the country and the judge orders Stewart prove he claim when the hearing is rescheduled again.

The tenant has pendingCentral lock and key enters unit illegally court actions against Central Lock & Key for the break & enter and the Barrie Police department for the tenants rights being violated as they stood by and watched knowing Catherine Stewart did not have any legal documentation for what she instructed the locksmith to do.Another Upper Law Society complaint was filed against C A Stewart of Landlord Legal for her presence at 40 Ellen Street on August 15th 2013 and her instructions to the police and the locksmith.

The tenant has also written the Upper Law Society of Canada over paralegal, Howard Tavroges involvement with Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal in LTB tribunals in Barrie at the same time as the tenant is suing her clients for the agreement he had initially made with her on his behalf.

** Concerns and allegations of past Orillia Legal Clinic, paralegal Howard Tavroges, divulging client privileged information to Catherine Stewart during the launching of the civil suits Stewart & Dykstra Bros Electric filed against the ODSP recipient and tavrogesex tenant had arisen when Stewart used the information to contact the Orillia Community Legal clinic with threatening letters over alleged websites that were discussed in confidential discussions with Howard Tavroges and Orillia Legal Clinic director Michael Hefferon,tenant and involved parties, directly in LTB matters in May & June of 2013.The tenant asks for minutes from the meeting to be provided as recording device was not allowed in this confidential discussion of the tenants right to grow medical marihuanna and the LTB process ahead of him and did receive the information he requested.

** Catherine Stewart also filed a civil lawsuit against the tenant over one of the alleged websites, without any documentation to prove who owned it.

A minimum fine of $25,000 and a year suspension if the tenants ULSC complaints are heard and Stewart found guilty of his claim.

“I have thirteen years experience and know my job” ~ Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal tells Barrie police officers M Beard & Cst Turner

C A Stewart and William Dykstra tell the attending Barrie police officers M Beard and Turner that Stewart had received an email from the Privacy Commissioner of Canada stating the tenant had contacted them and had vacated days before.

Landlord legal inc and William Dykstra could not produce the alleged email they claimed, they walked away when it was requested from the tenant.
** The tenant had earlier conversation that morning with C A Stewarts office to arrange the walk through and receive the last months rent.
** Owners of Dykstra Bros Electric and C A Stewart never had intentions of honoring the agreement they made on July 15th 2013 in LTB tribunal.
** The ex-tenant files civil case SCC #1546-13 in Aug/2013 to retrieve owed funds from Dykstra Bros Electric of Barrie,Ontario.

** The tenant finally receives the owed funds in May 2014, after Dykstra Bros Electric and Landlord Legal knowingly waste Civil Courts time, Orillia Legal Clinics time & resources plus the ODSP recipients time & money for many months, attempting the owed LTB ORDER they had willingly signed, for the order.

** Be sure to read the follow up posts to the end of the civil hearings where Stewart and Dykstra Bros electric finally concede and pay the tenant the money owed from the Sean Henry LTB Order after many efforts and motions not to do so.

The tenant withdraws his CET #33911-13 application and includes the August 15th 2013 illegal entry and lock removal incident in his HRTO  applications against Catherine Stewart of Landlord legal and her clients Ralph Dykstra, William Dykstra and Don Dykstra of Dykstra Bros Electric.

Catherine Stewart filed two (2) civil cases in Barrie courts in November 2013, SCC #1851-13 & SCC #1852-13, against the tenant to attempt to have this website shut down or at the very least have the posts removed and claimed $5000 in property damages, although Catherine Stewart of Landlord legal made a call to the Barrie police under false pretenses and had Central lock & Key illegally enter the unit and the locks were removed and never replaced.

Catherine Stewart, of Landlord Legal inc soon learned that she was in the wrong court room to have this website shut down but continued in civil court for many,many months to detain the HRTO application and the Law Society complaints filed against her clients and her Barrie and Meaford paralegal firm offices,Landlord Legal inc !!!

Stewart requested to withdraw her previous two (2) lawsuits when the tenant had asked for motions to be heard on the matter on May 27th 2014 and received permission to file a counter suit against Catherine Stewart and her clients Ralph Dykstra, William Dykstra, Don Dykstra of Dykstra Bros Electric.

Read further details on Catherine Stewarts SCC #1851-13 civil court claim here : Landlord Legal – Catherine Stewart VS Privacy-Violators

Read further details on Dykstras SCC #1852-13 civil court claim here : Ralph Dykstra,Don Dykstra & Bill Dykstra VS Privacy Violators Website

We will continue to update all the past LTB hearings with the details, the pending Human Rights cases against Landlord Legal and her clients and the Upper Law Society complaints as they compiled.

Paralegals and Lawyers should not or should know NOT TO THREATEN parties they are involved in proceedings against with CRIMINAL ARREST, FURTHER LEGAL THREATS or any kind of threat meant to harm the other party or to delay, coerce or influence the proceedings they are involved in.

Landlord Legal has openly threatened an ex tenant with criminal charges on her Landlord legal website while Human Rights/Civil allegations pending ( http://landlordlegal.ca DEC 2015 to Jan 22nd 2016) of her paralegal firm, alleged boyfriend and Dykstra Bros electric owners allegedly have been defending alleged discrimination against the Human Rights of the tenant.lANDLORD-LEGAL-website-page

Images showing the serious threats to the ex tenant, Tenant Rights Applicant and the Human Rights Applicant made from the owner, Catherine April Stewart,for Landlord Legal inc publicly advertised paralegal services website threatening CRIMINAL CHARGES after numerous unsubstantiated and FALSE ALLEGATIONS made to the Barrie Police..

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to know not to create “CONFLICT of INTEREST” and if so, to remove themselves from ALL legal proceedings they are directly involved in.

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to know they are to advise clients and not act illegally for the clients they represent.

Paralegals and Lawyers should know or aught to know they are not allowed to be present at or participate in illegal acts like break ins or illegal lock changes.

New stories of the Barrie Police officers involvement and the reasons for their contact of the Dykstra Bros Electric ex tenant , who allegedly harassed the ex tenant on behalf of ex OPP officer Paul T Smith and his alleged longtime girlfriend and propertyBarrie police management company owner and paralegal April Catherine Stewart while the tenant was in various courts against them.All Freedom Of Information requests for the incidents have been applied for from the Barrie Police and will be posted as soon as all police matters are compiled and released to Privacy-Violators.com, at the appropriate time concluding certain matters before the Ontario courts.

Do Barrie police play favorites and harass the ex tenant ??

..read the article and decide for yourself the level of their involvement and false calls put forth by Landlord Legal repeatedly unsubstantiated claims and the true intentions they had.

 

All Lives Matter !! .. Except at Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario

The hash tags #Black lives matter and #All lives matter have been the public issue and in the news over the last couple of years.No matter what your race,creed,religion, or background we are suppose to have protection from the wrong doers in today’s society.

All lives matter is not something that Renu Mandhane, head of the Human Rights Commission, can say about the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario, located at 655 Bay Street, where they operate their Mickey Mouse HRTO court system in Toronto, Canada.

The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO) is run by Registrar Richard Hennessy and is suppose to have lawyers, acting as impartial mediators when dealing with Human Rights allegations brought up to the Tribunal to be heard.

The HRTO constantly breaches its own mandate when dealing with issues brought forth by Canadian citizens who attempt to right the wrong done to them concerning violating their Human Rights in Canada.

Quoted from Social Justice Tribunals Ontario website : The Code prohibits:

  • Discrimination against a person because he or she has a relationship, association or dealing with someone who is identified by one of the grounds listed above.
  • Reprisal (a legal term that means punishment or retaliation) or threats of reprisal, because a person has either claimed their rights, refused to discriminate against someone else or was a participant in a human rights proceeding.
  • Sexual solicitation or advances by a person who is in a position to give or deny a benefit.
  • Reprisal or threats of reprisal for rejecting a sexual solicitation or advance.

Quoted from the Social Justice Tribunals Ontario website :

What We Do


If you believe you have experienced discrimination or harassment, you can file an application with the HRTO. The HRTO resolves claims of discrimination and harassment brought under the Human Rights Code in a fair, just and timely way.

The HRTO first offers parties the opportunity to settle the dispute through mediation. If the parties do not agree to mediation, or mediation does not resolve the application, the HRTO holds a hearing.

Hearings and mediations are held in Toronto, Hamilton, Kingston, London, North Bay, Ottawa, Sarnia, Sault Ste. Marie, St. Catharines, Sudbury, Timmins, Thunder Bay and Windsor. See also: Practice Direction on Hearings in Regional Centres.

HRTO decisions are made by adjudicators called vice-chairs or members. HRTO adjudicators have experience, knowledge and training in human rights law and issues.

The HRTO’s Rules of Procedure, Practice Directions and Policies apply to its proceedings

The HRTO is one of seven tribunals which form Social Justice Tribunals Ontario (SJTO). HRTO does its work in keeping with the core values of SJTO:

  • Accessibility
  • Fairness and independence
  • Timeliness
  • Transparency
  • Professionalism and public service

Harassment is a form of discrimination. The Code defines harassment as “a course of vexatious comment or conduct that is known, or ought reasonably to be known, to be unwelcome”. It includes offensive comments or actions directed at you that are related to one or more of the Code grounds.

Human Rights allegations proceed against Landlord Legal & Paul Smith… Stewart closes Meaford office

Catherine-Stewart

A paralegal firm owned and operated by Catherine April Stewart of Landlord Legal inc has been in our website news since May of 2013, when April Stewart of landlord Legal inc was hired to evict a tenant of Ralph Dykstra, William Dykstra and Donald Dykstra of Dykstra Bros Electric of Barrie.

The tenant in question had a valid Medical Marihuanna license to possess and grow his own medical marihuana as well as signed permission from the three Dykstra Brothers themselves but was forced to file allegations in Human Rights against Ralph Dykstra, William Dykstra, Donald Dykstra, Catherine April Stewart and her alleged boyfriend,process server and private investigator Paul T Smith when they attempted to evict him from his 40 Ellen Street Barrie Ontario apartment.

Landlord Legal inc had moved her files and set up another office at 44 Sykes Street N Meaford, Ontario with the help of her alleged boyfriend, retired OPP officer, process server and private investigator Paul T Smith, in June of 2013, but recently closed her Meaford office in June 2015 with the allegations against her and Paul Smith in Human Rights.

Landlord Legal closes Meaford office

Landlord Legal now runs her small paralegal firm from her home in Walter’s Falls and a small Barrie office located at 117 Bayfield Street Suite 101 located in the alleyway connection between the two buildings.

** Additional notes,photos and follow up on further details.

Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal failed to notify the Human Rights Tribunal of the office closing as per the Rules of Procedure during the proceeding.The tenant had notified the HRTO of the fact when he had tried to serve legal documents to the address on file and discovered it was closed.After talking with other commercial business close to her closed office, the process server discovered it was closed in June 2014, one year after she opened in Meaford,Ontario.

Read the past stories of the missed LTB Tribunal Hearings, civil hearings,and serious interference with a “fair trial” allegations against April Stewart of Landlord Legal, Paul Smith and her clients, Dykstra Bros Electric.

The ex tenant still has many pending complaints filed against this paralegal and her firm with the Law Society of Upper Canada , Privacy Commissioner of Canada, and the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (pending) since she started representing Dykstra Bros Electric of Barrie from May 2013 to present to evict the tenant.

William Dykstra of Dykstra Bros Electric
William Dykstra
Ralph Dykstra of Dykstra Bros Electric
Ralph Dykstra
Don Dykstra
Donald Dykstra
Groves
Nancy Aikens mother
Nancy Groves-involved neighbor
Nancy Ailens (Groves)

 

 

 

 

 

Ralph Dykstra, William Dykstra and Donald Dyksytra, past owners of Dykstra Bros Electric, will face a Human Rights Hearing that has been rescheduled for January 20th 2016, after a previous hearing date was delayed and a summary hearing was requested.

April Stewart
47-year-old April Stewart is known as the “Terminator”

 

Catherine April Stewart of Landlord Legal inc and Paul T Smith have also had a summary hearing completed and the involved parties are presently awaiting dates from the Human Rights Tribunal for the hearing to be heard.

Other allegations or allegations of attempts at blocking justice in the past, against owner Catherine A Stewart of Landlord Legal inc has been,

  • allegations of illegal lock change – witnessed by Barrie police
  • allegations of illegal entry- witnessed by Barrie police
  • Catherine Stewart Breached May 7th 2013 LTB court order when she personally signed it, forcing ODSP tenant to take civil action to obtain the funds un neccessarily wasting many days of courts / tenants time and money,to do so,acting in bad faith deliberately.
  • Court orders never paid to ODSP ex tenant – FAILED TO SHOW at Settlement Conferences and several motions
  • Paul T Smith – private investigator * illegal privacy invasion, searches and photos
  • Allegations of privacy violations,tenants personal information and property photographed top to bottom by Paul Smith
  • “Cease and Desist” letters from disgraced paralegal Diana Smith & Landlord Legal inc office – never a “court ordered” document
  • “Do not trespass” letter -117 Bayfield St  #101 Barrie & old Meaford Ont. 44 Sykes Street North business addresses
  • “Do not trespass” letter – Dykstra’s commercial plaza or residential properties or businesses – no court orders for either
  • Placing Paul Smith on witness stand – WHEN NOT ON THE WITNESS LIST
  • Placing Paul Smith on witness stand – WHEN NO “WILL SAY” PROVIDED BEFORE TRIAL
  • Paul Smith lying on the stand in the Barrie civil trial for her Dykstra clients defense
  • Interfering with a criminal investigation when she allegedly paid Rob Scruton to be a witness and for the FALSE evidence she introduced against the rules & procedures in the Dykstra Bros Electric civil trial SCC #1852-13.
  • Allegations of entering false evidence and statements brought against Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal and Paul T Smith in Human Rights.
  • Serving the tenant directly with a NO TRESPASS letter at his residence by Paul Smith, which was NOT ON FILE with the courts.. and while he had legal council representing him and Human Rights allegations against Smith & Stewart.
  • Several false police reports filed by C A Stewart against the Barrie tenant exercising his rights on Human Rights
  • Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal BREACHED A COURT ORDER that she had previously motioned for,when she emailed the ex tenant on June 11th 2015 against the judges instructions, and used Paul T Smith in capacities that cite UN PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT ALLEGATIONS
  • Catherine Stewart delayed her civil allegations since October 2013 against Privacy Violators blog with NO INTENTION of challenging in a higher court as she claimed in a motion she put forward while breaking rules and procedures in the Superior Court of Canada to get her motion heard.

and many other allegations to the Law Society that will be brought up as the Human Rights hearings are completed.

An “ORDER DURING A PROCEEDING” has been requested and submitted to the Registrar in the HUMAN RIGHTS ALLEGATIONS for Paul Smith and Catherine April Stewart of Landlord Legal inc to PROVE the existence of documents Stewart has claimed to have filed with the Toronto Landlord & Tenant Board, North office back in May 2013.

Allegations of entering false testimony and evidence arose during the Dykstra civil trial, as well as the Human Rights during a summary phone conference with Paul Smith and Catherine Stewart when they submitted a “certificate of service” from the May 2013 “intent to enter” into their response to the Human Rights allegations against them.The Toronto North LTB office supplied copies of ALL files to the tenant, on record for all incidents,including May 2013, but failed to locate the document Landlord Legal provided to the tribunal when tracking documents, to three different departments and three different managers was submitted.

As of August 15th, 2015, Landlord Legal inc has not provided the proof requested but stated in an email to the Registrar, they would provide proof if directed by him to do so. There has been NO movement on this serious allegation of entering false evidence and statements into a court hearing or tribunal.

The Law Society has also been requested previously by the ex tenant to investigate the false evidence allegations, the illegal lock removal and entry by Dykstra’s and their representative C A Stewart of Landlord Legal inc of Barrie as well as a dozen more allegations of un professional conduct, breach of an order and numerous civility complaints .

Catherine Stewart and Paul Smith first claimed the existence of the alleged documents during his testimony on the stand at the Dykstra civil trial when Stewart placed him there without disclosure, without proper will says or PAUL T SMITH name on the proposed witness list.

human rights commission_400x400

HUMAN RIGHTS HEARING FOR OWNER OF LANDLORD LEGAL INC, CATHERINE APRIL STEWART & PAUL SMITH WERE RECENTLY JOINED TOGETHER WITH RALPH DYKSTRA, WILLIAM DYKSTRA & DONALD DYKSTRA AND IS NOW SET TO BE HEARD ON  JANUARY 20th 2016

 

Landlord Legal has of September 2015, not informed the Human Rights Tribunal of the changes in her business address for the representation of her clients, Dykstra Bros Electric set for a hearing on January 20th 2016 or for the Human Rights allegations brought against Paul Smith and herself which is still awaiting a hearing date.There has been a long history of allegations of harassment , un necessary court delays, several abuses of the court system and many other allegations that are still pending and awaiting investigation.

C A Stewart contacted the Law Society claiming there are pending court actions involving herself and the tenant which has stalled the allegations into being investigated.It has been 2 years since this was filed in Barrie Civil Courts on October 22nd 2015 and the case of Stewart vs Ross has yet to have a hearing.

Catherine Stewart has not informed the Law Society of Upper Canada of the pending Human Rights allegations that were filed against her in May of 2014 and now pending for a hearing January 20th 2016. The paralegal was also involved with a Landlord and Tenant hearing in September 2013 along with her Dykstra clients allegations of illegal entry and illegal lock change but did not show for the hearing sending another paralegal, stating she was out of the country but FAILED TO NOTIFY THE OTHER PARTY OR PROVE HER CLAIM.

To date, Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal has filed numerous FALSE ALLEGATIONS with the Barrie police concerning the ex tenant, all to be listed with the related video from the Barrie detective Sgt Steele investigation and all the incident reports from the involved Barrie Police officers and Landlord Legal inc., in another related upcoming posting.

The BBarrie policearrie police have numerous times REFUSED the ex tenant to file CRIMINAL HARASSMENT CHARGES against this paralegal after he tried several times to file complaints against her for the numerous false reports she has continued to file. A further complaint to the Law Society is still pending on these harassment grounds, as she was well aware the allegations were false and of the pending civil and Human Rights hearings with this ex tenant she was and is still involved in.

The Barrie Civil Courts have continued to ignore this citizens rights when on July 11th 2014, the tenant motioned for a speedy trial,the civil court has also prejudiced and ignored the rights of this individual when it stripped his rights to serve legal documents in ways addressed in the Rules of Civil Court Procedures and ordered that documents only be served by email without probable cause or justifying its reasons.

Judge Kalowski further breached the Rules of Civil Procedures when he took Catherine April Stewart into his chambers after a scheduled motion without the other side being present, stating “it was on an unrelated matter”, but Catherine April Stewart stated in court on that day “it was her first time in Civil court”, again showing the prejudice of Judge Kalwoski and the Barrie courts.

A pending complaint to the Law Society to investigate the allegations of civil court Judge Kalwoskis breaches of the rules and discrimination and violation of his rights towards the Barrie citizen.Transcripts of that Motion Hearing will be presented to the Law Society for an investigation into these allegations.

IT IS TRULY A MESSED UP SYSTEM WITH THE  LAW SOCIETY OF UPPER CANADA INVESTIGATION, WHEN SERIOUS ALLEGATIONS, ARE DELAYED FOR YEARS, WHEN THE OFFENDING PARALEGAL ONLY HAS TO FILE ANY FALSE CLAIM IN COURT, THEN DELAY THE PENDING COURT ACTIONS INDEFINITELY !!

Any disgruntled parties that have any additional information you would like to pass on concerning, Catherine April Stewart of Landlord Legal inc, private investigator & retired police officer Paul T Smith or Ralph Dykstra, William Dykstra, Donald Dykstra of the Dykstra Bros Electric of Barrie, we would love to hear more from you.

Please Call, write or email us anytime with the details.

Central Lock & Key of Barrie enter unit illegally to change locks !

stel01_079085
 

 

 

From a story dating back to August 15th 2013th which led to

1)  Several Landlord & Tenant Board tribunal complaints,
2)  A joint submission LTB court order signed by Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal for her Dykstra Bros Electric clients,
3)  Two (2) civil cases in Barrie against Dykstra Bros Electric * Heard March 12th 2015
4)  One civil case against Catherine April Stewart of Landlord Legal inc (Meaford/Barrie) * Now June 30th 2015
5)  Numerous Law Society complaints filed and on hold against Catherine Stewart until civil case finished
6)  Law Society Complaints against her newest paralegal Howard Tavroges
7)  Human Rights allegations against Dykstra Bros Electric to be heard June 10 2015
8)  Human Rights allegations against Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal inc ( Meaford/Barrie)
9)  Human Rights allegations against Stewart’s boyfriend, employee and retired OPP officer of 30 years, Paul Smith

Several other false accusations by April Stewart, Howard Tavroges and attempts to have tenant charged with Barrie police to be discussed when police report is obtained and posted here on our website.

Privacy Violators wants to bring the rest of the story to you.

August 15th 2013 – Paul Richardson and his son Cody Richardson entered the 40 Ellen Street Barrie unit illegally and proceeded to change the locks on orders from Catherine Stewart and in front of 2 attending police officers and without any court papers or legal papers of any kind picked the bottom lock and cut the security chain to gain entry illegally.

Central lock and key enters unit illegally

Central Lock & Key of Barrie were called to 24 Victoria Street by Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal, and the owners of the units Dykstra Bros Electric for a legal Sheriffs order they had for the unit nut admitted on the stand at the civil hearing that none were provided to them when they illegally entered 40 Ellen Street August 15th 2013.

 

Paul Richardson and his son Cody Richardson of Central Lock & Key has worked for 4 -5 years on several occasions with Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal changing locks, according to the owner Paul Richardson, on the stand March 12th 2015.

Paul Richardson of Central Lock & Key has no fixed store address for this locksmith service and has no business license and no records with the City of Barrie to operate a business in Barrie. He runs a van as a mobile unit set up with equipment to change and make key & lock changes.It makes it hard to find and serve locksmiths set up like this as summons have to be given in person so we want to help other people that need to find this business for what ever their reasons are and this is probably the reason Catherine Stewart uses locksmiths like Paul Richardson Central Lock & Key for her eviction and lock removal processes.

In October 2013 Paul Richardson and his son Cody Richardson, along with Barrie police officer Melanie Beard, were summoned to the LTB hearing which Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal inc had claimed to be out of the country for and Stewart had also failed to notify the tenant or the LTB tribunal of her intentions although she had plenty of time she was notified before the trial and had the contact information for the tenant in the court files.

Cody Robertson-central lock and keyCody Richardson, shown here to the left next to their Central Lock & Key mobile unit was being served for the March 12th civil hearing when he threatened the ex tenant and the Barrie police had to be called. Cody Richardson sped out the driveway barely avoiding a car blocking him in and ran, not waiting to talk to the officers about his threats !!

Although properly served, Cody Richardson of Central Lock & Key Barrie failed to show March 12th 2015 civil trial !

Paul Richardson, the owner of Central Lock & Key did show up at the civil trial and on the stand became a hostile witness when he had to admit he was directed to enter the unit illegally by Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal inc and asked the judge to listen to an audio recording he had taken.

Paul Richardson had saved an audio recording (18 months on his phone) from the September 2013 LTB hearing summons when the tenant had told him if he co operated he would not write badly about the deeds he had done illegally August 2013th on Catherine Stewart’s direction as the tenant knew they were manipulated as were the Barrie police. When asked on the stand when the audio was taken, Paul Richardson had lied, when he said he did not know when it was recorded, although it was evident from the recording it was from 18 months prior for the September 2013 LTB attempts to summon him for the LTB trial that Catherine Stewart and her clients failed to show or to notify the LTB Tribunal or the tenant involved.

Landlord Legal owner Catherine April StewartCatherine Stewart of Landlord Legal inc had filed two $25,000 civil cases in Barrie against the ex tenant, on ODSP and un garnishable, one for Ralph Dykstra, Bill Dykstra, Don Dykstra of Dykstra Bros Electric and the other from her paralegal firm personally. Stewart and her clients failed to show for the “Mandatory Settlement Conference” for the civil cases she filed against the tenant. These allegations were finally heard March 12th 2015 and the judge hearing the case “Reserved Judgement” and we will post the results and the orders whenever we finally receive them.

Read the Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal inc stories we have posted and the new updates to the civil and Human Rights allegations against Dykstra Bros Electric and her employee and boyfriend Paul Smith, a retired OPP officer and licensed private investigator that she has to do her private work.

Choose your locksmiths wisely and do a little research before you allow them into your home !!

If you have a story connected to Central Lock & Key of Barrie, Dykstra Bros Electric or Landlord Legal inc that you would like to share with our readers, please feel free to contact us anytime with the details

Canada Revenue Agency fires 14 employees, suspends 18 more for privacy violations

The Canada Revenue Agency ha fired 14 employees and suspended another 18 more employees over the past year for unauthorized access of computer files as the agency responds to criticism that it isn’t doing enough to protect the privacy of Canadians.

News of the disciplinary action comes on the heels of a damning audit report last fall by the federal privacy commissioner. Auditors found managers were unaware that some Canadian Revenue Agency (CRA) employees had been inappropriately accessing records from thousands of taxpayers for years undiscovered.

“I think the numbers do reflect that we take the problem quite seriously and that we do follow through when incidents do occur,” said Susan Gardner-Barclay, the Assistant Commissioner of the CRA, without providing any further details on the CRA employee firings and suspensions.

Eight former CRA officials have been charged in connection to a six-year corruption investigation by the RCMP, which announced the end of the probe in February.

Senior CRA officials were testifying Tuesday as part of a broader study by the Commons committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics into concerns over identity theft. The agency was on the defensive over its approach to data breaches by mail.

The agency confirmed that over 2,983 data breaches took place in 2013 – almost all related to mail going to the wrong location – and that 46 per cent of those cases involved personal information. Yet the CRA acknowledged that the vast majority of taxpayers who have had their information sent to the wrong place are never made aware of the breach. Further, the CRA only told the privacy commissioner about 479 of the breaches.

Ms. Gardner-Barclay said the agency’s decisions on whether or not to inform taxpayers or the privacy commissioner about a breach are based on an internal risk assessment used to determine the seriousness of the release.

The CRA said it reclaims about 95 per cent of mail that was sent to the wrong place, but also acknowledged that it can only measure breaches that have been reported back to the agency, meaning the true numbers could be much higher.

Officials said one of the main causes of data breaches is because automated mail sorters place letters meant for two separate addresses into a single envelope.

“It’s usually a machine error,” said Ms. Gardner-Barcley, explaining that virtually all mail has been automated. “It’s very rare that we would be putting documents in envelopes by hand.”

NDP MP and committee member Charmaine Borg – who has dealt with a constituent who received mail from CRA meant for someone else – said Canadians should be told when their information has been breached.

The NDP had previously asked through a written request in Parliament for data on all breaches going back to 2006, however the CRA said it only began tracking such statistics last year.

“I think it’s very concerning,” she said after the meeting, arguing the CRA should be forced to inform Canadians whenever there is a breach. “As a Canadian, you give your information to the government and you should have faith that the government is going to protect that information. But to not even be aware of when your personal information was breached or put at risk? It’s a problem in my view.”

Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal VS Privacy Violators 2013 – 2015 in Full review

April Stewart
47-year-old April Stewart the privacy violator

NO MORE WAITING FOR UPDATES TO : Catherine Stewart VS Privacy Violators website small claims case SCC #1851-13

The following series of posts, is to bring the followers of the Catherine April Stewart VS Privacy Violators website claims and bring the full progress of the allegations in the Barrie, Ontario Small Claims Court, Catherine April Stewart filed against this website from October 2013.

 

 

** BE SURE TO READ THE DYKSTRA BROS ELECTRIC allegations in the Dykstra Bros Electric 2013-2015 in full review with audio from the first LTB Dykstra hearing May 7th 2013 & October 24th 2013 illegal entry and illegal lock change from Paul Richardson and his son Cody Richardson from Central Lock and Key services from Barrie, Ontario.

 

** Read also the new Central Lock & Key posts concerning the incident August 15th as well as Paul Richardson testimony in court and about his sons threats when he was summoned for the Barrie civil hearing March 12th 2015.A police complaint was filed for the threats made from Cody Richardson when he was served to be a witness in the civil cases for the illegal entry and illegal lock change made by his dads company, Central Lock and Key, which was ordered from Catherine Stewart directly to do so, in front of the attending Barrie Police officers Beard and Turner.
Cody Richardson, although summoned did not attend !

Catherine Stewart had previously brought a motion for her personal lawsuit to be heard together with her Dykstra Bros Electric clients, Ralph Dykstra, Bill Dykstra and Donald Dykstra SCC #1852-13 which was heard in Barrie courts March 12 2015, and then did a motion for them to be separated after 17 months of waiting.

The civil judge at the hearing did not hear Catherine Stewart’s case, although there was little evidence submitted by Stewart and no witnesses from either side to be called upon during the Dykstra hearing, instead he had allowed her motion, and put Stewart’ hearing off until June 30th 2015 further delaying the Law Society complaints filed by the ex tenant against her paralegal firm, Landlord Legal inc.

A copy of the civil court transcripts with the two attending Barrie police officers testimony and Paul Richardson of Central Locksmith statements from the hearing have been requested and a letter to the director of the Law Society requesting a time extension is to be filed after receiving them for the illegal entry and illegal lock change allegations filed from August 2013 against Catherine Stewart and her firm.

Other complaints lodged with the Law Society against Catherine Stewart were for constantly delaying and wasting court time deliberately when she claimed to be out of the country for the September 24 2013 LTB hearing and many other court dates she did not attend or notify the other party involved in civil matters for the retrieval of the funds owed from an LTB order she personally signed July 2013, which the tenant had to take to civil court to get and for the 2 civil cases she had filed against Privacy Violators, including not showing up for the mandatory settlement conference after filing her lawsuits, and the many motions during the last 2 years in which given lots of notice but failed to show. All the orders and the judgement from these cases will be posted soon on the website.

Privacy Violators website has received many email complaints about Landlord Legal inc doing the same thing to them in past LTB hearings as well as vexatious claims she has brought up against other tenants and not provide disclosure, prove her claims she had filed with invoices and or proof and then turn around and withdraw her claims she had brought forth in LTB to intimidate or scare the tenant into submission. We have asked several people to provide documentation for these past allegations so we may add them to our own complaints or help them file there own personal complaints against Stewart for the Law Society of Upper Canada.

Catherine April Stewart of Landlord Legal inc has been allowed to manipulate the Barrie police, Landlord and Tenant Board and the Barrie Civil courts on many occasions and with the many emails we have received on our website concerning her past actions regarding this will bring it up in LSUC complaints as well.

Check out Landlord Legal inc new website changed last year and read the tenant story she has posted on her front page, and then come back and read the many complaints and stories posted here on Privacy Violators website.

Landlord Legal - Catherine StewartThe Small Claims lawsuit Catherine Stewart had filed for $25,000 for allegedly damaging her paralegal firms reputation and other allegations against Privacy Violators website, filed in October 2013, and then amended late last year, by Stewart, when the Barrie court told her she was in the wrong court to have our website shut down have yet to finalize and see the inside of a courtroom.

 

Catherine April Stewart of Landlord Legal inc has wasted the civil courts time by not showing up when fighting to get the order paid from LTB and repeatedly FAILING to notify the other party that her paralegal firm had filed the lawsuit against , for the mandatory settlement conference, and for many motions for the #1851-13 & #1852-13 cases heard.

This is NOT THE FIRST TIME April Stewart of Landlord Legal inc has failed to show or to notify the other side for civil cases or Landlord & Tenant Board tribunal dates that were set and provided to her well within the time limits given by the courts.

The numerous Law Society of Upper Canada complaints previously filed in 2013 & 2014 against April Stewart of Landlord Legal inc by her clients Dykstra Bros Electric inc ex tenant, and also against another private practice paralegal associated with her firm Landlord Legal inc, Howard Paul Tavroges for privacy issues were put on hold by the LSUC until the current court matters filed from April Stewart are heard in civil court.The complaints that were filed do not show up tavrogese-image_400x400anywhere on the LSUC website, not even as outstanding complaints or pending complaints so there is no way to know there are complaints previously filed and on record.

This is another tactic used by paralegals such as April Stewart & Howard Tavroges to delay courts, frustrate and waste time and money !!

** Catherine Stewart of Landlord Legal inc has June 30th 2015 to hear her allegations she filed October 2013 when she filed her claim against this website. Catherine Stewart failed to show for the Small Claims Court mandatory settlement conference set for the allegations she made against us. An order was made for Stewart to pay the tenant for NOT NOTIFYING the tenant or the court that she did not intend on being present for this hearing. Landlord Legal inc clients, Dykstra Bros Electric also failed to show or notify the tenant or the court that they also had no intentions of paying the order nor for attending this mandatory hearing.

Dykstras commercial plaza Ellen 38 St BarrieAllegations that Privacy Violators had damaged her Dykstra Bros Electric clients and Landlord legal paralegal firm reputation after posting actual police incident reports and claims of harassment, illegal lock change, illegal entry which were directed by April Stewart to the  locksmiths while Barrie Police stood by and watched her do an illegal act and did nothing while they were acting under the authority of her Landlord Legal inc paralegal firm in July 2013 cannot be to damaging to her firm as she does not seem interested in ending this long dispute and does not attend her own lawsuit to justify her claims !!

The past topics and postings on Privacy Violators website of the actual police incident reports, Law Society of Upper Canada complaints and all the direct court documents that supported it’s allegations following April Catherine Stewart, owner of Landlord Legal inc, actions against a past tenant of Dykstra Bros Electric of Barrie, Ontario whom she was representing led Stewart to file a Small Claims case against this website.

Health Canada breaches MMA participants privacy

health-canada Health Canada has come under investigation again from the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, after receiving hundreds of complaints that Health Canada had sent out revealing private information to 40,000 registered participants in the Medical Marihuana Access Program (MMAP) that clearly had identifying Medical Marihuana Access (MMA) program association on the upper left of the envelopes. The letters sent out, and received by approximately 40,000 participants in late November, clearly stated on the envelope that they were from the Marihuana Medical Access Program.

In the six years of being a MMAP registered participant, I have always received and sent correspondence to and from the Health Canada MMAP through private special delivery mail, tracked and signature required.health-canada-MMAR-letter

Your Pal AL has had many correspondences with several investigators from the Privacy Commissioner of Canada from my all my personal complaints that i have filed.. and all I can say is when its not a big corporation they are investigating, and only private sector personal complaints, they did not investigate much at all.

All the complaints that were filed by me against Landlord Legal, Dykstra Bros Electric, Coin Hoarders Treasury and Health Canada, with all the corresponding letters to and from the Privacy Commissioner of Canada investigators will be posted here as all are scanned and organized soon.

A class action lawsuit has been filed against Health Canada for the clear breach of privacy that had occurred. Here is another good post to check out from the Ottawa Citizen with Liberal health critic Hedy Fry urging the Federal Privacy Commissioner to find out why Health Canada outed the 40,000 Medical Marihuana Access users, leaving them vulnerable to home invasion and robbery.

From Ottawa Citizen post : “Medical marihuana privacy breach due to Health Canada “incompetence”,critics say”.

Hedy Fry ~ Liberal health critic

“Privacy alone is a huge breach,” she said, “but now the risks to some of these people is huge. It’s really extraordinary and this government has to answer why, on three separate occasions in the last two years, they have screwed up. This government knows how to keep who said what to whom in the Prime Minister’s Office secret, but they aren’t competent enough to keep important information about Canadians that under the Privacy Act they have to keep secret.”

 

Shortly after the letters became public , Health Canada deputy minister George Da Post issued a statement apologizing to the 40,000 recipients.

“Health Canada is taking steps to ensure this does not happen again,” he said.

In a statement to the Ottawa Citizen, Health Canada denied that any changes had been made to its mailing procedures.

Link to Privacy Commissioner website : Privacy Commissioner to investigate Health Canada for possible breach of personal information

Link to ctvnews.ca website post from November 25 2013 : Medical marijuana users launch proposed lawsuit after Health Canada privacy gaffe

Link to cannabisculture.com post : Health Canada’s War on Medical Marijuana Patients

Upcoming Events

There are no upcoming events at this time.

September 2019
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday
August 26, 2019 August 27, 2019 August 28, 2019 August 29, 2019 August 30, 2019 August 31, 2019 September 1, 2019
September 2, 2019 September 3, 2019 September 4, 2019 September 5, 2019 September 6, 2019 September 7, 2019 September 8, 2019
September 9, 2019 September 10, 2019 September 11, 2019 September 12, 2019 September 13, 2019 September 14, 2019 September 15, 2019
September 16, 2019 September 17, 2019 September 18, 2019 September 19, 2019 September 20, 2019 September 21, 2019 September 22, 2019
September 23, 2019 September 24, 2019 September 25, 2019 September 26, 2019 September 27, 2019 September 28, 2019 September 29, 2019
September 30, 2019 October 1, 2019 October 2, 2019 October 3, 2019 October 4, 2019 October 5, 2019 October 6, 2019
error: Content is protected !!